arrow left
arrow right
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
  • 313 Hackberry Land VS. Great Lakes Insurance Company SE, Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonInjury or Damage - Other (OCA) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically Filed 8/15/2022 9:00 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Faith Martinez CAUSE NO. C-2791-22-E 313 HACKBERRY LAND § IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, § § v. § § HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS GREAT LAKES INSURANCE SE and § UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, § LONDON § Defendant. § 275th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON’S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Defendant Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Defendant” or “Lloyd’s”) files its original answer and affirmative/other defenses in response to Plaintiff 313 Hackberry Land (“Plaintiff”) Original Petition (the “Petition”). I. GENERAL DENIAL 1. Defendant asserts its general denial as authorized by Rule 92 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to the allegations contained in Plaintiff’s Petition, and any amendments or supplements thereto, and upon trial of this case will require Plaintiff to prove each and every allegation asserted against it by a preponderance of the evidence, as is required by the laws of this State of Texas and the Constitution of the United States. II. AFFIRMATIVE AND OTHER DEFENSES 2. Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part due to the terms, limitations, restrictions, exclusions, and endorsements contained in and to the Policy that is the basis of Plaintiff’s suit. 3. Plaintiff’s claims are barred because there was a reasonable basis for denying all or part of the insurance claim at issue. 4. Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part by the equitable doctrine of waiver. Page 1 of 3 Electronically Filed 8/15/2022 9:00 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Faith Martinez 5. Plaintiff’s claims are barred in whole or in part because Plaintiff failed to mitigate or minimize its alleged damages. 6. Plaintiff’s damages, if any, were proximately caused by the acts, omissions, or breaches of other persons and entities, including Plaintiff, and said acts, omissions, or breaches were intervening and superseding causes of Plaintiff’s damages, if any. Defendant asserts its right to comparative and/or proportionate responsibility as provided in Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and request that the fact finder apportion responsibility as provided in Chapter 33. 7. Defendant claims all offsets and credits available under Chapter 33 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. 8. Any and all claims alleged by Plaintiff are barred, in whole or in part, to the extent they seek an improper punitive damages award for an alleged single wrong because such an award would violate Defendant’s rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, including, without limitation, the Due Process and Equal Protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Defendant’s rights to the Due Course of Law under the Texas Constitution. 9. Plaintiff is not entitled to punitive damages, and any and all excessive amounts of such damages sought herein violate Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, the Texas Constitution, and the United States Constitution, all of which set limits on the award of punitive damages. 10. Any award of pre-judgment interest is limited by the dates and amounts as set forth in Chapter 304 of the Texas Finance Code and/or Chapter 41 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code. Page 2 of 3 Electronically Filed 8/15/2022 9:00 AM Hidalgo County District Clerks Reviewed By: Faith Martinez 11. Defendant reserves the right to later amend or add to these affirmative defenses. III. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London respectfully requests the Court enter judgment that Plaintiff take nothing in this suit, the Court enter an order dismissing Plaintiff’s suit with prejudice, Defendant recover its costs and attorneys’ fees, and for all other relief to which Defendant may be justly entitled. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Valerie Henderson Valerie Henderson Texas Bar No. 24078655 Kirsten D. Vesel Texas Bar No. 24121183 BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ. P.C. 1301 McKinney Street, Suite 3700 Houston, Texas 77010 Telephone: (713) 650-9700 Facsimile: (713) 650-9701 vhenderson@bakerdonelson.com kvesel@bakerdonelson.com Attorneys for Defendants CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 15, 2022, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the following counsel pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure: Larry W. Lawrence, Jr. Michael A. Lawrence Celeste Guerra LAWRENCE LAW FIRM 3112 Windsor Rd. Suite A234 Austin, Texas 78703 Lawrencefirm@aol.com Lawrencefirm@gmail.com /s/ Valerie Henderson Valerie Henderson Page 3 of 3 Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Cecilia Bravo on behalf of Valerie Henderson Bar No. 24078655 cbravo@bakerdonelson.com Envelope ID: 67269128 Status as of 8/15/2022 9:07 AM CST Associated Case Party: Great Lakes Insurance Company SE Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Kirsten Vesel kvesel@bakerdonelson.com 8/15/2022 9:00:18 AM SENT Valerie Henderson vhenderson@bakerdonelson.com 8/15/2022 9:00:18 AM SENT Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Cecilia Bravo on behalf of Valerie Henderson Bar No. 24078655 cbravo@bakerdonelson.com Envelope ID: 67269128 Status as of 8/15/2022 9:07 AM CST Associated Case Party: 313 Hackberry Land Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Michael Lawrence 24055826 lawrencefirm@gmail.com 8/15/2022 9:00:18 AM SENT Larry W. Lawrence 794145 lawrencefirm@aol.com 8/15/2022 9:00:18 AM SENT