arrow left
arrow right
  • DONNA BAILEY VS DARELYNE HEACOCK, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • DONNA BAILEY VS DARELYNE HEACOCK, ET AL. Other Personal Injury/Property Damage/Wrongful Death (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 08/23/2021 03:20 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by L. Coreas,Deputy Clerk 1 Philip P. Deluca, Esq.; State Bar No. 158633 LAW OFFICES OF PHILIP P. DeLUCA 2 5820 East Naples Plaza Belmont Shore, CA. 90803 3 Telephone (562) 987-1300 Telecopier (562) 987-131 O 4 Attorney for Plaintiff, 5 DONNA BAILEY 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT-SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 9 10 DONNA BAILEY, ) Case Number: 21STCV14469 ) 11 Plaintiff, ) Honorable Thomas D. Long, Judge, ) Dept "31" 12 V. ) ) Plaintiff, DONNA BAILEY's Opposition to 13 DARELYNE HEACOCK; FARMERS ) Defendant FARMERS AND MERCHANTS AND MERCHANTS TRUST COMPANY ) TRUST COMPANY's Motion to Strike 14 and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive ) Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended ) Complaint; Memorandum of Points and 15 Defendants. ) Authorities --------------) 16 Date: September 3, 2021 Time: 1:30 p.m. 17 Dept.: "31" 18 Trial: October 14, 2022 19 COMES NOW, Plaintiff, DONNA BAILEY with her Opposition to Defendant, 20 FARMERS AND MERCHANTS TRUST COMPANY's Motion to Strike to Strike 21 Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. 22 Plaintiff opposes Defendant, FARMERS AND MERCHANTS TRUST 23 COMPANY's (hereinafter referred to as "FMT") Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's 24 First Amended Complaint on the following grounds: 25 1. Defendant FMT's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages 26 claims that the FAC "falls short of alleging facts to warrant pupitive damages", 27 asserting that "Even the most severe of Plaintiff's allegations (that she and HEACOCK 28 engaged in a brief physical altercation) is insufficient to seek punitive damages". Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 1