arrow left
arrow right
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
  • Guadalupe Basulto, JR vs. Centex Homes / COMPLEX10 Unlimited - Construction Defect document preview
						
                                

Preview

NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP J. BRIAN MORROW, CBN JONATHAN ‘ 191392 N. KING, CBN 227121 ULEQ. 2018 SEP 2 l: 1333 N. Califomia Blvd, Suite 600. Walnut Creek, COURT California 94596 FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR (925) 988—3200; (925) 988-3290 (Fax) By .p MMD-DEPUTY Attorneys for Defendant CENTEX HOMES QQLII RECEIVED VIA EFILE 9/20l2018 12:13 PM FRESNO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT By: C. York, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OlF FRESNO 10 11 GUADALUPE BASULTO, IR., an $CASE NO.: 18CECG02001 LLP DILLION 12 individual, ct al., Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [m1 ORDER TO STAY PURSUANT TO RIGHT S: 13 TO REPAIR ACT (Cal. Civ. Code § 896, et VS. seq.) NEWMEYER 14 CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada General FILE DATE: June 5,12018 15 Partnership; DOES 1-500, inclusive,, TRIAL DATE SET: No Dafe Set '16 Defendants. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and bel ween Plaintiffs (hereinafter “PLAINTIFFS”) 19 and Defendant CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada Gen eral Partnership (hereinafter “CENTEX”) by 20 and through their respective counsel, as follows: 21 l. WHEREAS the eleven (1 1) homes at issue in this action, as identified below, are 22 subj ect to the Right to Repair Act: l g 23 24 5897 East Fillmore Avenue Guadalupe Basulto, J' Fresno, CA 93727 . 25 Sourtanh Bounxou and Cher 385 South Stanford Avenue 26 2 Thao Bounxou Fresno, CA 93727 27 3 Ghee Chang = 5893 East Mono Sheet 28 Fresno, CA 93727 1084.724 /775] 873.] STIPULATION AND [PROP DSED] ORDER TO STAY Gordon B. Cromwell II} and 548 South Bundy Drive 4 Kathleen Cromwell Fresno, CA 93727 . . . . i 5876 East Inyo Street 5 Pamela D1rc10 Tellez - Fresno, CA 93727 Becky (Rebecca) Gomen and 302 South Stanford Avenue 6 Juan Gomez Fresno, CA 93727 OOQQUI - 5861 East Fillmore Avenue 7 Refugla M. Guerra ~ Fresno, CA 93727 r - 5864 East Inyo Street 8 Pahoua Her and Lee Lal \O Fresno, CA 93727 10 5946 East Mono Street 9 Sloan Rehder Fresno, CA 93727 11 5931 East Huntington LLP 10 Greg sehoenwald 12 Avenue Fresno, CA 93 727 DILLION 13 - 653 South Renn Ave. G: 11 Nathamcl L. Fudge Fresno, CA 93727 NEWMEYER 14 2. WHEREAS PLAINTIFFS and CE \ITEX wish to avoid the time and expense 15 involved with the adjudication of a Motion to Sta] r pursuant to Califomia Civil Code Sections 910 16 and 914; 17 3. NOW THEREFORE, the Parties a gree as follows: 18 A. This matter shall be stayed for allpurposes pending PLAINTIFFS’ and 19 CENTEX’S compliance with the Right to Repair Act; 20 B. Neither PLAINTIFFS or ENTEX waive any rights that either may have C]; 21 by agreeing to this stay and either may seek the C )urt’s intervention to enforce the Right to 22 Repair Act, as applicable, or the stay, if necess 313’; lift 23 C. CENTEX’s appearance pur suant to this Stipulation shall not be deemed a 24 general appearance, but is solely a limited and/or pecial appearance for purposes of this 25 Stipulation “only”; and 26 D. The Parties request that the Court continue the October 2, 201 8 status 27 conference to a date approximately 120 days after the date of this Stipulation to review the status 28 1084.724/7751873.1 - 2} STIPULATION AND [PROP DSED] ORDER TO STAY' of the stay of this matter. IT IS SO STIPULATED: V Dated: Afigust“ / , 2018 E H]NNICK & RYAN LLP (II-bU-i Luke 15. RyanW Lori J.Guthrie Kevin Hambly Attorneys for Plainti(s \OOO\IO\ S t b Dated: EgtiLg ,201 8 NEWMEYER & DILLION LLP 10 h'l Dy: J.Brian Morrow 11 LLP Jonathan N. King Attorneys for Defendant 12 DILLION CENTEX HOMES, a Nevada General Partnership 8x. 13 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: NEWMEYER 15 This matter shall be stayed for allpurposes pending‘PLAINTIFFS and CENTEX’S 16 compliance with the Right to Repair Act; 17 A. Neither PLAINTIFFS or CENTEX v aive any rights that either may have by 18 agreeing to this stay and either may seek the Court’s interventionto enforce the Right to Repair 19 Act, as applicable, or liftthe stay, if necessary; 20 B. CENTEX’S appearance pursuant to this Stipulation shall not be deemed a general 21 appearance, but issolely a limited‘and/or special apfi 'earance for purposes of this Stipulation 22 only”; and 23 The October J C. 2, 2018 status conferen'c e is continued t0 24 m (W flung?) 30 ,20|q at fiz ?.m_ian.epanment5_9_3 . 25 26 Dated: q M / ¢ /<}/ J Jdge of-the’Superior Court 27 28 1084.724/7751873J -3 .. STIPULATION AND [PROPOE ED] ORDER TO‘STA‘Y W SERVICE Basulto vs C ’nfex Homes. Fresno County Superior C01 rt; Case N0. 18CECG02001 ; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) I,Nakia Plummer, declare: I am a citizen of the United States and elr ployed in Contra Costa County, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to he within—entitled action. 1 My business address is \DOOQQ 1333 N. California Blvd, Suite 600, Walnut Cr eek, California 94596. On September 18, 2018, I served a copy ofthe within document(s): STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDE R T0 STAY PURSUANT TO RIGHT TO 10 REPAIR ACT (Cal. Ci v. Code § 896, et seq.) LLP 11 12 D by transmitting via forth below on this facsimile the d ocument(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set date before p.m 5:(; DO DILLION K4 by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon 13 8r fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Walnut Creek, California addressed as 14 set forth below. NEWMEYER 15 D by placing the document(s) listedi above in a sealed FedEx envelope and affixing a pre—paid air bill, and causing the e nvelope to be delivered to a FedEx Delivery 16 Service agent for delivery. 17 18 D by transmitting a copy ofthe internet/electronic mail to File fore; going & document(s) this date via ServeXpress (formerly Lexis Nexis File & Serve) for service on all parties in this ca se via their e-mail addresses, pursuant to court 19 order. A copy of the receipt will toe attached to the document and maintained in this office. I 20 PLEASE SEE ATTAC HED SER VICE LIST 21 Iam readily familiar with the firm's practrce of collection and processing correspondence 22 for mailing. Under that practice it would be depq sited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the 0rd ary course ofbusiness. I am aware that on motion of the party served, 1 23 service is presumed i valid ifpostal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day afier date ofdep )sit for mailing in affidavit. « 24 I declare under penalty ofperjury under tlne laws of the State of California that the above 25 istrue and correct. Executed on September 18, 2 ()18, at Walnut Creek, California. 26 27 Nakia Plummer 28 1084.724 /77253 13.1 PROOF OF SERVICE SERVK 'E .LIST Basulto vs C >ntax Homes. Fresno County Superior C01 rt; Case No. 18CECG02001 , Luke P. Ryan Tel: 619-239-5900 Lori J. Guthrie Fax: 619-230—1933 Kevin B. Hambly [PLAINTIFFS] SHINNICK & RYAN LLP KOOOQQMAUJNI—I Khamblx@s'rfirms.com 1650 Hotel Circle North, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92108-9962 LLP DILLION 8: NEWMEYER NNNNNNNNNHr—H—Hr—Ht—y—tr— mfioNLh-hWNHOKOMNONUIAWNF-‘o 1084.724/ 7725313.] PROOF OE SERVICE