arrow left
arrow right
  • MARTINE KING, ET AL. VS WSH MANAGEMENT, INC. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • MARTINE KING, ET AL. VS WSH MANAGEMENT, INC. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/21/2021 10:50 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by A. Miro,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name,State Bar number,and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY LITIGATION & ADVOCACY GROUP Glenn A. Murphy (SBN: 255994) 2945 Townsgate Road, Suite 200, Westlake Village, California 91361 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 7 43-6438 FAX NO. (OptionaQ: E-MAIL ADDRESS (OptionaQ: ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Plaintiffs Martine King, et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE STREET ADDREss: 111 N. Hill Street MAILING ADDREss, Same c1TY AND 21P coDE: Los Angeles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mask Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: MARTINE KING, et al. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: WSH MANAGEMENT, INC. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): [ZJ UNLIMITED CASE LJ LIMITED CASE 21 STCV29709 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 1/12/2022 Time: 8:30 AM Dept.: 68 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [l] Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Glenn A. Murphy INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. W This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiffs Martine King, et al. b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): August 11, 2021 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. W All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. C=:J The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in W complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): Plaintiffs assert claims for violations of the Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act (ICRM) , Civil Code § 1786, et seq., B&P 17200, invasion of privacy and declaratory relief. Pa e1 of5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use cal. Rules of Court, Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3. 720-3. 730 CM-11 0 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov