On August 06, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Del Campo Gerardo,
People Of The State Of California,
and
Two Hundred Seventy-Eight Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Dollars 278 530.00 In U.S. Currency,
for Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/01/2021 02:47 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by W. Moore,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Grace Pak, Deputy District Attorney, 188016
211 West Temple Street, 11th floor
Los Angeles, CA 90012
TELEPHONE NO.: (213) 257-2100 FAX NO. (Optional): (213) 633-1928
E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): gpak@da.lacounty.gov
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Petitioner
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Los Angeles
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angeles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: The People of the State of California
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: $278,530.00 in U.S. Currency
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21STCP02559
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: December 17, 2021 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept.: 24 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Grace Pak
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Plaintiff/Petitioner
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Asset Forfeiture - In Rem Proceeding
Page 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
December 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 06, 2021
Category
Asset Forfeiture Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.