Motion-Secondary: ROSA BRAIDOTTI VS GILMER POZO, ET AL.

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 01/10/2022 02:31 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Chanes,Deputy Clerk




              1 || RUSSELL                  J. THOMULKA,              SBN 63007 -
                 -f/ Attorney at Law         .
              2121243       Ventura Boulevard,    Suite    141
                     Woodiand Hills,   California    91364
              3]      (818) 594-5004
                     Email:   legalman6@hotmail.com
              4
                     Attorney   for Defendants/Cross-Complainant                                                                  Gilmer          Pozo,         An
                5 } Individual,                     Prominence           Real       Estate,                        Inc.,          a     California
                Ps   Corporation                    and       Fiorella        Pozo,          An           Individual


              7

                8                                   SUPERIOR          COURT       OF     THE              STATE              OF       CALIFORNIA

                9    IN    AND          FOR       THE     COUNTY       OF     LOS      ANGELES,                        SOUTHEAST              JUDICIAL               DISTRICT

            10                                                              NORWALK              COURTHOUSE

            11 || ROSA BRAIDOTTI,                             An Individual,} Case                                     No:        21NWCV00334
                                                                                             )       Hon.  Margaret                          Miller        Bernal
            12                                            Plaintiff,                         }       Dept:  F
                                                                                             )
            13                                vs.                                            )       DEFENDANTS’   OPPOSITION TO
                                                                                             )       PLAINTIFF’ S APPOINTMENT   OF
            14 47 GILMER  POZO,   An Individual,                                             }       A GUARDIAN  AD LITEM
                  FLORELLA ANGELICA     POZO,  An                                            }
            15 | Individual;     PROMINENCE   REAL                                           )
                  ESTATE,  INC.,    a California                                             }
            16 || Corporation;    POWERHOUSE   ESCROW                                        )
                 CORP.,  a California                                                        )
            17 | Corporation;  and DOES                                1-50,                 }                 .                                                               .
                 Inclusive,                                                                  )
            18                                                                               }
                                                          Defendants.                        }
            19       RO)
                                                                                             )
           20 || AND         RELATED                CROSS-ACTIONS.                           )
                     ee)
           21

           22                     The         Defendants              Gilmer        Pozo,                 an           individual,                Prominence                 Real

           23 f Estate,                      Inc.,        a     California             Corporation                                and        Fiorella                Pozo,         an

           24        |Ppindividual                 oppose        the        request                  of            the         Plaintiff             to         appoint             a

           25 || Guardian                    Ad    Litem        for    the      Plaintiff,                          Rosa          Braidetti.

           26                     It        appears           that     Plaintiff’s                        attorney                     submitted           an        Ex-Parte

           27 | Motion                 on     December          3,    2021      for      a       hearing                  at          8:30   a.m.     in        Department |

           28        “F*     of        the        Norwalk       Courthouse             to        have              a     Guardian            Ad    Litem         appointed
                                                                                                 1


                     uo                 SdDEFENDANT’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S APPOINTMENT OF A GUARDIAN AD LITEM.                                                           —