On April 15, 2021 a
Complaint,Petition
was filed
involving a dispute between
Nguyen Edgar,
and
Darcc Inc. A Corporation,
for Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/08/2021 04:19 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Tang,Deputy Clerk
1 John T. Farmer, Esq. (SBN 089168)
Matthew A. Schiller, Esq. (SBN 306622)
2 FARMER CASE & FEDOR
402 W. Broadway, Suite 1100
3 San Diego, California 92101
(619) 338-0300 / (619) 338-0180 (Fax)
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff-In-Intervention
5 PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE
10 EDGAR NGUYEN, ) CASE NO.: 21STCV14251
)
11 Plaintiff, )
) PREFERRED EMPLOYERS
12 v. ) INSURANCE COMPANY’S
) COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION
13 DARCC, INC., a California corporation; )
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ) Filed: April 15, 2021
14 ) Judge: Hon. Thomas D. Long
Defendants. ) Dept.: 31
15 )
)
16 PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE )
COMPANY, a California corporation, )
17 )
Plaintiff-In-Intervention, )
18 )
v. )
19 )
DARCC, INC., a California corporation; )
20 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, )
)
21 Defendants. )
)
22
23 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF-IN-INTERVENTION, PREFERRED EMPLOYERS
24 INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through its counsel, FARMER, CASE & FEDOR, and
25 alleges the following:
26 1. The combined demand of any and all causes of action that involve money, is more
27 than $25,000.00 (TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS) and are within the jurisdiction of
28 the above-captioned Court.
1
PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY’S COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION
Document Filed Date
September 08, 2021
Case Filing Date
April 15, 2021
Category
Premise Liability (e.g., dangerous conditions of property, slip/trip and fall, dog attack, etc.) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 12/20/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 09/08/2021 04:19 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Tang,Deputy Clerk 1 John T. Farmer, Esq. (SBN 089168) Matthew A. Schiller, Esq. (SBN 306622) 2 FARMER CASE & FEDOR 402 W. Broadway, Suite 1100 3 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 338-0300 / (619) 338-0180 (Fax) 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff-In-Intervention 5 PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE 10 EDGAR NGUYEN, ) CASE NO.: 21STCV14251 ) 11 Plaintiff, ) ) PREFERRED EMPLOYERS 12 v. ) INSURANCE COMPANY’S ) COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION 13 DARCC, INC., a California corporation; ) and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ) Filed: April 15, 2021 14 ) Judge: Hon. Thomas D. Long Defendants. ) Dept.: 31 15 ) ) 16 PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a California corporation, ) 17 ) Plaintiff-In-Intervention, ) 18 ) v. ) 19 ) DARCC, INC., a California corporation; ) 20 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ) ) 21 Defendants. ) ) 22 23 COMES NOW PLAINTIFF-IN-INTERVENTION, PREFERRED EMPLOYERS 24 INSURANCE COMPANY, by and through its counsel, FARMER, CASE & FEDOR, and 25 alleges the following: 26 1. The combined demand of any and all causes of action that involve money, is more 27 than $25,000.00 (TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS) and are within the jurisdiction of 28 the above-captioned Court. 1 PREFERRED EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY’S COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION