On August 11, 2021 a
No Value
was filed
involving a dispute between
Bitetti Stephanie,
and
Proterra Operating Company Inc.,
for Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
FILED
Superior Court of California
County of Los Angeles
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SEP 012021
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES _ Stertik. Carter, Ex ve Officer/Clerk
COURTHOUSE ADDRESS: By. Z yt Deputy
Michele Torres
Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANT:
STEPHANIE BITETTI PROTERRA OPERATING COMPANY, INC.
‘CASE NUMBER DEPARTMENTIUNIT
62
COMPLEX CIVIL CASE QUESTIONNAIRE 21STCV29732 TELEPHONE WONEER
Name of person filling out this form: Ronald J. Holland
Telephone Number: 628-218-3800 . RECEIVED
3 it
If this form is completed by counsel, identify the party that counsel represents: Defendan
Hon. Michael L. Stern SEP O1 2021
FILING WINDOW
Name of bench officer to whom case is assigned:
Department to which case is assigned: 6
—INSTRUCTIONS—
Pursuant to California Rule of Court, rule 3.403, the Court must decide as soon as reasonably practicable whether
an action is a complex case, and the Court has the continuing authority to determine that a civil action is a
complex case. When a judge to whom a case is assigned determines that the case should be designated as
“complex” within the meaning of California Rule of Court, rule 3.400, the judge may seek to transfer the case to
the Complex Litigation Program using the procedure specified in Local Rules, rule 3.3(k). This form is designated
by the Assistant Supervising Judge, Complex Litigation Courts as the Complex Civil Case Questionnaire to be
completed by the judge assigned to the case, or by a party, on order of the Court.
The purpose of this questionnaire is to help the Court identify cases appropriate for inclusion in the Complex
Litigation Program. Responses should be derived from the Court's experience with the case since it was filed,
examination of the court case record, and information provided by parties and counsel, to the extent that
information is readily available to the individual(s) completing this questionnaire. The questionnaire and the court
case record will be reviewed by the Assistant Supervising Judge, Complex Litigation Courts. The information
provided in this questionnaire should be as thorough as possible to facilitate this review and to expedite
determination of whether the case should be included in the Program. The Assistant Supervising Judge, Complex
Litigation Courts may request a telephonic status conference with the parties to obtain additional information. The
Assistant Supervising Judge, Complex Litigation Courts may decide whether or not to accept the case for the
Complex Litigation Program with or without a hearing. If the case is not accepted for the Complex Litigation
Program, the assigned judge’s complex case designation nevertheless governs the case.
LACIV 211 (Rev. 09/12) COMPLEX CIVIL CASE QUESTIONNAIRE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.400
LASC Approved 09-08 Page 1 of 5
For Optional Use
Document Filed Date
September 01, 2021
Case Filing Date
August 11, 2021
Category
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Court-Ordered Dismissal - Other (Other) 09/14/2022
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.