Party Notice: JAMES SHAYLER VS CARWOOD CENTER, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 06/03/2022 01:33 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Chanes,Deputy Clerk



               1     Joseph R. Manning Jr., Esq. (State Bar No.223381)
                     MANNING LAW, APC
               2
                     20062 S.W. Birch St., Suite 200
               3     Newport Beach, CA 92660
                     Office: (949) 200-8755
               4     Fax: (866) 843-8308
                     DisabilityRights@manninglawoffice.com
               5

               6     Attorneys for plaintiff, James Shayler

               7
                                                   SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
               8

               9               IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES—NORWALK COURTHOUSE

             10

             11      JAMES SHAYLER,                                                              Case No.: 22NWCV00045
             12                             Plaintiff,
             13
                     vs.                                                                         NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT’S
                                                                                                 MOTION TO RECLASSIFY
             14                                                                                  PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
                     CARWOOD CENTER, LLC
             15
                                            Defendant
             16
                                            TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD
             17

             18                             PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 02, 2022, at 10:30AM, in Department C of

             19      the above-entitled court, the Defendant’s motion to reclassify the Plaintiff’s complaint from
             20
                     “unlimited” to “small claims” regularly came on for hearing before the court.
             21
                                            Osman M. Taher, Esq., of Manning Law, APC, appeared for the plaintiff and
             22
                     responding party.
             23

             24                             No one appeared on behalf of the defendant and moving party.

             25                             Good cause appearing, the Court ruled as follows:
             26
                     -Both parties having submitted on the court’s tentative ruling, the tentative ruling becomes the
             27
                     ruling of the court DENYING the defendant’s motion for reclassification.
             28
                     NOTICE OF RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RECLASSIFY PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT - 1