arrow left
arrow right
  • RICARDO HERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • RICARDO HERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS GENERAL MOTORS LLC Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/14/2022 03:12 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Abraham,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Mary Arens McBride, Esq., SBN: 282459 Darshnik Brar, Esq., SBN: 338035 THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP, PC. 1576 N. Batavia St., Suite A Orange, CA 92867 TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 777-6032 FAX NO. (Optional): (714) 844-9035 E-MAIL ADDRESS: dbrar@erskinelaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): GENERAL MOTORS LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angles, CA 90012 BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Ricardo Hernandez DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: GENERAL MOTORS LLC,et al al CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER: (Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21STCV35349 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 03/11/2022 Dept.: 58 Div.: Room: Time: 08:30 AM Address of court (if different from the address above): Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Darshnik Brar, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant, General Motors LLC b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names): 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed. b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which they may be served): 4. Description of case a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action): The case involves breach of warranty allegations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act. Page 1 of 5 Cal. Rules of Court, Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730 CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov