On September 24, 2021 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cruz De Hernandez Yesenia,
Hernandez Ricardo,
and
General Motors Llc,
for Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 02/14/2022 03:12 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Abraham,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address):
FOR COURT USE ONLY
Mary Arens McBride, Esq., SBN: 282459
Darshnik Brar, Esq., SBN: 338035
THE ERSKINE LAW GROUP, PC.
1576 N. Batavia St., Suite A
Orange, CA 92867
TELEPHONE NO.: (949) 777-6032 FAX NO. (Optional): (714) 844-9035
E-MAIL ADDRESS: dbrar@erskinelaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR (Name): GENERAL MOTORS LLC
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
STREET ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
MAILING ADDRESS: 111 North Hill Street
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Los Angles, CA 90012
BRANCH NAME: Stanley Mosk
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Ricardo Hernandez
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: GENERAL MOTORS LLC,et al
al
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:
(Check one): UNLIMITED CASE LIMITED CASE 21STCV35349
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 03/11/2022
Dept.: 58 Div.: Room:
Time: 08:30 AM
Address of court (if different from the address above):
Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Darshnik Brar, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. This statement is submitted by party (name): Defendant, General Motors LLC
b. This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names):
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b. The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b. The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3) have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
they may be served):
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in complaint cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
The case involves breach of warranty allegations under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act.
Page 1 of 5
Cal. Rules of Court,
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
February 14, 2022
Case Filing Date
September 24, 2021
Category
Other Complaint (non-tort/non-complex) (General Jurisdiction)
Status
Request for Dismissal - Before Trial not following ADR or more than 60 days since ADR 08/24/2023
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.