arrow left
arrow right
  • Anthony Gomez vs  Mary Johnson22 Unlimited - Auto document preview
  • Anthony Gomez vs  Mary Johnson22 Unlimited - Auto document preview
  • Anthony Gomez vs  Mary Johnson22 Unlimited - Auto document preview
  • Anthony Gomez vs  Mary Johnson22 Unlimited - Auto document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF GfQKIFORNIA - COUNTY OF FRESNO /l~§ntered byi Civil Depz 7 ,Ient - Non-Limited '1_ / TITLE 0F CASE: Anthony Gomez vs Mary Johnson _Case Number: LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER 13CECG02945 Hearing Date: December 18, 2019 Hearing Type: General Motion Re: Pitchess Motion Department: 501 , Judge/Temp. Judge: Hamilton, Jeffrey Y. Court Clerk: Lopez, Maria ReporterlTape: Not Reported Appearing Parties: Plaintiff: Defen'dant: Not Present Counsel: Kevin Kalajian Counsel: Third Party in Interest! Attorney Kyle Roberson [X] Court convened at 10:20 a.m. Plaintiff’s counsel, Real Party in Interest, County of Fresno Sherriffs Department by and through Lieutenant ' Robert Salazar, and counsel for same were present. Defense counsel was not present. Although Defendant vowed t0 have a court reporter present for the “Pitchess” hearing, none was present when the court began or concluded the hearing. Prior to recessing incourt, Lt. Salazar was sworn. Lt. Salazar, Counsel for the County and the Court adjourned to Chambers at 10:21 a.m. Lt. Salazar was asked by the Court if he had retained or failed to provide any of Plaintiffs records, to which he replied, “No. Ibrought the entire file.” The court reviewed the non-medical personnel file; no records were relevant to the request and, as such, will not be disclosed. The court reviewed the approximately 1/2”medical file. The couIt finds that the medical records fromlthe present incident relevant and will be disclosed. The County will redact any personal information such as home addreSs, CDL, SSN, etc. (ifany exists) prior to the disclosure on January 3, 2020. Both Plaintiff and Defendant will be provided copies under and pursuant to a protective order that counsel for County will draft and this court will sign. Production will not occur if protective order is not signed. All records produced shall be returned (including any copies made) to the custodian, Lt. Salazar, at the end of the litigation. CV-14b R03-18 u ________ r-__ LAW AND MOTION MINUTE ORDER ,1” "I SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA- COUNTY OF FRESNO QFOR COURTUSEONLY CivilDepartment Central Division 1 130 “O" Street Fresno, California 93724-0002 (559) 457-2000 TITLE OF CASE: Anthony Gomez vs Mary Johnson CLERK'S CERTIFICATE 0F MAILING » Cfisgé'égfifiggs lcertify that lam not a party to this cause and that a true copy of the: 12/1 8/2019 Minute Order was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. |am readily familiar with this court's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, itis deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of mailing: Fresno, California 93724-0002 On Date: 12/18l2019 Clerk, by // %/ 2gmm /\ ,Deputy M L pezl Daniel R. Baradat Victoria R. Bernhardt Baradat & Paboojian, Inc. McCormick Barstow et al LLP 720 W. Alluvial Ave 7647 North Fresno Street Fresno, CA 9371 1-5705 Fresno, CA 93720 Kyle R Roberson County Counsel 2220 Tulare Street, 5th Floor Fresno, CA 93721 D Clerk‘s Certificate of Mailing Additional Address Page Attached TGN-06b R08-06 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING