arrow left
arrow right
  • XUEYUN ZOU, ET AL. VS YAO GUO, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • XUEYUN ZOU, ET AL. VS YAO GUO, ET AL. Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/18/2022 12:44 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Dunn,Deputy Clerk CM-110 ATIORNEYORPARTY WITHOUT ATIORNEY(Name. State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY Jorn S. Rossi, Esq . #86721 31600 Railroad Canyon Road, Suite B Canyon Lake, CA 92587 TELEPHONE NO. 951.409.3499 FAX NO. (Optional) : E-MAIL ADDREss roptionaiJ: rossilaw@yahoo.com ATIORNEYFOR (NameJ plaintiffs, Zou & DL Trucking Inc. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES sTREET ADDREss 150 W. Commonwealth MAILINGADDRESS: ciTY AND ZIPcoDE Alhambra, CA 91801 BRANcHNAME Alhambra Courthouse PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ZOU Etal. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: GUO Etal. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASENUMBER: (Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE 0 LIMITED CASE 22AHCV00123 (Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25 ,000 exceeds $25 ,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: 08 I 0 4I 20 22 Time : 8:30 a.m. Dept. : 3 Div.: Room: Address of court (if different from the address above): [X] NoticeoflntenttoAppearbyTelephone, by(name): Jorn S. Rossi, Esq. INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. 0 This statement is submitted by party (name) : plaintiffs, Zou and DL Trucking Inc. b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names) : 2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): 03/04/2022 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only) a. 0 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared , or have been dismissed. b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) : (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names) : c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which tbey may be served)· Burgee & Abramoff- a CA law firm that plaintiff at defendant Guo's instruction had wired $300,000 .00 of the money Guo ripped them off of on Guo's phony I am "the producer" of the movie fraud . 4. Description of case a. Type of case in 0 complaint D (Describe , including causes of action): cross-complaint [1] Fraud In The lnducement,[2] Financial Elder Abuse ,[3] Conversion ,[4] Breach of Contract, [5] Money Due of Promissory Note , and [6] Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Pa e 1 of 5 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Judicial Council of California CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rul es of Court, rules 3. 720-3.730 CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011) www. courts.ca.gov