On March 04, 2022 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Dl Trucking Inc.,
Zou Xueyun,
Gosdom Inc,
and
Gosdom Inc,
Guo Trustee Of The Guo Protection Trust Yao,
Guo Yao Aka Vanessa Yao Guo Aka Vanessa Guo Aka Guo Baozhi Aka Yuki Guo,
for Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
in the District Court of Los Angeles County.
Preview
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 07/18/2022 12:44 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by V. Dunn,Deputy Clerk
CM-110
ATIORNEYORPARTY WITHOUT ATIORNEY(Name. State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
Jorn S. Rossi, Esq . #86721
31600 Railroad Canyon Road, Suite B
Canyon Lake, CA 92587
TELEPHONE NO. 951.409.3499 FAX NO. (Optional) :
E-MAIL ADDREss roptionaiJ: rossilaw@yahoo.com
ATIORNEYFOR (NameJ plaintiffs, Zou & DL Trucking Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
sTREET ADDREss 150 W. Commonwealth
MAILINGADDRESS:
ciTY AND ZIPcoDE Alhambra, CA 91801
BRANcHNAME Alhambra Courthouse
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: ZOU Etal.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: GUO Etal.
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASENUMBER:
(Check one): 0 UNLIMITED CASE 0 LIMITED CASE 22AHCV00123
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25 ,000
exceeds $25 ,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: 08 I 0 4I 20 22 Time : 8:30 a.m. Dept. : 3 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):
[X] NoticeoflntenttoAppearbyTelephone, by(name): Jorn S. Rossi, Esq.
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.
1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. 0 This statement is submitted by party (name) : plaintiffs, Zou and DL Trucking Inc.
b. D This statement is submitted jointly by parties (names) :
2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date): 03/04/2022
b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. 0 All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared , or have been dismissed.
b. D The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names) :
(3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names) :
c. D The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and date by which
tbey may be served)·
Burgee & Abramoff- a CA law firm that plaintiff at defendant Guo's instruction had wired $300,000 .00 of
the money Guo ripped them off of on Guo's phony I am "the producer" of the movie fraud .
4. Description of case
a. Type of case in 0 complaint D (Describe , including causes of action):
cross-complaint
[1] Fraud In The lnducement,[2] Financial Elder Abuse ,[3] Conversion ,[4] Breach of Contract, [5] Money Due of
Promissory Note , and [6] Constructive Fraudulent Transfer
Pa e 1 of 5
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rul es of Court,
rules 3. 720-3.730
CM-110 [Rev. July 1, 2011) www. courts.ca.gov
Document Filed Date
July 18, 2022
Case Filing Date
March 04, 2022
Category
Contractual Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.