arrow left
arrow right
  • JOSHUA YAGHOUBZADEH VS MCKENNA MOTORS NORWALK, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D.B.A. MCKENNA PORSCHE, ET AL. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • JOSHUA YAGHOUBZADEH VS MCKENNA MOTORS NORWALK, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D.B.A. MCKENNA PORSCHE, ET AL. Other Commercial/Business Tort (not fraud/ breach of contract) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Civil Division Southeast District, Norwalk Courthouse, Department C 22NWCV00160 October 6, 2022 JOSHUA YAGHOUBZADEH vs MCKENNA MOTORS 1:30 PM NORWALK, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION D.B.A. MCKENNA PORSCHE, et al. Judge: Honorable Olivia Rosales CSR: None Judicial Assistant: S. Alvarez ERM: None Courtroom Assistant: E. Armenta Deputy Sheriff: None APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff(s): Sevan Movsesian appearing for Joshua Yagoubzadeh via LACourtConnect For Defendant(s): Lisa Lorraine Loveridge via LACourtConnect NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: Hearing on Demurrer - with Motion to Strike (CCP 430.10) A tentative order is issued. The matter is called for hearing and argued. The Court having considered the papers and oral arguments, rules as follows: The Demurrer - with Motion to Strike (CCP 430.10) TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF; DECLARATION OF LISA L. LOVERIDGE RE: MEET AND CONFER filed by Mckenna Motors Norwalk, Inc., a California Corporation d.b.a. Mckenna Porsche on 05/25/2022 is Sustained without Leave to Amend. I. Defendant MCKENNA MOTORS NORWALK, INC.’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is SUSTAINED with 30 days leave to amend. II. Defendant MCKENNA MOTORS NORWALK, INC.’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint is MOOT. This PAGA action was filed by Plaintiff JOSHUA YAGHOUBZADEH, an individual on behalf of himself and the general public (“Plaintiff”) on March 4, 2022. Plaintiff alleges the following relevant facts, “On or about January 22, 2022, [Plaintiff] received an advertisement through Google.com, on which Defendants engaged in paid advertising and promotion of their business, promotions, and offers to the general and targeted public, for the lease of vehicle identified as a Porsche Taycan offered by Defendants for $999 per month with $999 cash due at signing.” (Complaint ¶12.) “Plaintiff contacted Defendants’ agent, Noah Schmerling, identified as a Minute Order Page 1 of 4