arrow left
arrow right
  • VALENTINE AHOOBIM VS TANNAZ MEIMAND, ET AL. Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • VALENTINE AHOOBIM VS TANNAZ MEIMAND, ET AL. Insurance Coverage (not complex) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/06/2022 10:15 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by S. Ruiz,Deputy Clerk 22STCV37993 Assigned for all purposes to: Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Rupert Byrdsong CRAIG RACKOHN, ESQ., SBN 116107 1 SCOTT A. KENNEDY, ESQ. SBN 164039 2 LAW OFFICES OF BURG & BROCK 4554 Sherman Oaks Ave. 3 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Telephone: (818) 676-9800 4 Facsimile: (818) 788-2559 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 VALENTINE AHOOBIM 7 8 9 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 13 VALENTINE AHOOBIM ) CASE NO. 14 ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 15 Plaintiff, ) 16 ) 1. Breach of Contract vs. ) 2. Professional Negligence 17 ) 3. Fraudulent Misrepresentation ) 4. Negligent Misrepresentation 18 TANNAZ MEIMAND, an individual; ) SEEMAN HOLTZ PROPERTY & ) 19 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASUALTY, a business form unknown; and ) 20 DOES 1 THORUGH 50, Inclusive, ) 21 ) Defendants. ____________________________________ 22 23 24 COMES NOW, Plaintiff VALENTINE AHOOBIM, who submits causes of action against 25 Defendants TANNAZ MEIMAND, an individual, SEEMAN HOLTZ PROPERTY AND 26 CASUALTY, a business form unknown, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, alleges as follows: 27 28 Page 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES