arrow left
arrow right
  • WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS BRIAN ARMSTRONG, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS BRIAN ARMSTRONG, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. Other Real Property (not eminent domain, landlord/tenant, foreclosure) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/16/2022 06:25 PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by J. Hernandez,Deputy Clerk 1 James J. Ramos (SBN 252946) jjramos@ww.law 2 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP 2212 Dupont Dr. 3 Irvine, California 92612-1525 Telephone: (949) 475-9200 4 Facsimile: (949) 475-9205 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 10 11 WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF Case No.: CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation, 12 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER 13 v. 14 BRIAN ARMSTRONG, an individual; MARIA 15 ARMSTRONG, an individual; ROBERT HOLMES, an individual; and DOES 1-50, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 COMES NOW, Plaintiff, WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA 20 (“WFG”), and alleges as follows: 21 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 22 1. WFG is now, and at all times herein mentioned, a duly authorized California 23 Corporation. 24 2. WFG is informed and believes, and on that basis, alleges, that Defendant BRIAN 25 ARMSTRONG (“BRIAN”) is an individual and, at all times herein mentioned, was a resident of 26 California. 27 3. WFG is informed and believes, and on that basis, alleges, that Defendant MARIA 28 1 COMPLAINT IN INTERPLEADER 4412174.1