arrow left
arrow right
  • FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION VS RAMCO DEMOLITION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
  • FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION VS RAMCO DEMOLITION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL. Contract/Warranty Breach - Seller Plaintiff (no fraud/negligence) (General Jurisdiction) document preview
						
                                

Preview

22NWCV01712 Assigned for all purposes to: Norwalk Courthouse, Judicial Officer: Margaret Bernal Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 12/27/2022 12:00 AM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by E. Chanes,Deputy Clerk NICK I. IEZZA, SBN 128570 1 SPIWAK & IEZZA, LLP 555 Marin Street, Suite 140 2 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 Tel: (805) 777-1175 3 Fax: (805) 777-1168 4 Refer to File No. 314.1188 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc. 6 7 8             9         10 11 FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC., a CASE NO.: Washington corporation, 12 [Unlimited Jurisdiction] Plaintiff, 13 (Prayer Amount - $70,446.83) vs. 14 COMPLAINT FOR MONEY RAMCO DEMOLITION, INC., a California 15 corporation; GERARDO RAMIREZ, an 1. Breach of Lease Agreement individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 2. Breach of Guaranty 16 3. Account Stated Defendant(s). 4. Claim and Delivery 17 18 GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 19 1. At all times mentioned herein, Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc., a Washington corporation 20 (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff), is a corporation , duly organized and existing under and by virtue 21 of the laws of the state of its incorporation. At all times mentioned herein, Plaintiff was authorized and 22 qualified by the Secretary of State of California to conduct business herein. 23 2. The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of 24 Defendants named herein as Does 1-10 are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues these Defendants 25 by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will amend this complaint to show the true names and capacities of 26 the Doe Defendants when their names have been ascertained. Each Doe Defendant is in some manner 27 28  -1-