arrow left
arrow right
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
  • Bank Of America Na v. Pamela C ElsbreeOther Matters - Consumer Credit (Card) Original Creditor Plaintiff document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: WAYNE COUNTY CLERK 07/21/2022 02:10 PM INDEX NO. CV088630 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. Plaintiff, DEFENDANT’S ANSWER -vs- Index No.: CV088630 PAMELA C ELSBREE Defendant. Defendant Pamela C Elsbree, as and for an Answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff, by and through counsel, Graham & Borgese, LLP, responds as follows: AS TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 1. Admits to the residence allegation contained in paragraph “1” of the Complaint but denies all else. 2. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “2” of the Complaint. 3. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “3” of the Complaint. 4. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “4” of the Complaint. 5. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “5” of the Complaint. 6. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “6” of the Complaint. 7. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “7” of the Complaint. 8. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “8” of the Complaint. 9. Denies knowledge or information sufficient enough to form a belief as to the allegations contained in paragraph “9” of the Complaint. 1 of 3 FILED: WAYNE COUNTY CLERK 07/21/2022 02:10 PM INDEX NO. CV088630 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2022 AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 10. That this action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 11. That the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant and or subject matter jurisdiction in this controversy. AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 12. That Plaintiff's first cause of action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 13. That Plaintiff has failed to mitigate its damages. AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 14. That Plaintiff's claims are barred for failure to allege specific transactions on the account relating to the alleged debt. AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 15. That Plaintiff's claims are barred by the Statute of Frauds. AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 16. That Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands. AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 17. That Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of laches. AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 18. That Plaintiff's claims are barred by the doctrine of estoppel. AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 19. That the amount Plaintiff claims is due and owing is incorrect. 2 of 3 FILED: WAYNE COUNTY CLERK 07/21/2022 02:10 PM INDEX NO. CV088630 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2022 WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that the Complaint be dismissed with prejudice and that Defendant be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and the costs of this action and motion and for such other and further relief as to the court seems just and proper. Dated: July 21, 2022 _________________________ Frank J. Borgese, Esq. Graham & Borgese, LLP TO: Rubin & Rothman, LLC Attorneys for Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff 1787 Veterans Highway Please send all correspondence to: Islandia, NY 11749 Graham & Borgese, LLP 1695 Empire Blvd., Suite 140 Webster, New York 14580 585-563-4020 3 of 3