arrow left
arrow right
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
  • CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL BUSINESS TORT document preview
						
                                

Preview

ANNUAL SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-02-2018 3:18 pm Case Number: CGC-18-564938 Filing Date: May-02-2018 3:17 Filed by: ERICKA LARNAUTI Image: 06320147 ORDER CHRISTINE A. BENNETT VS. THOMAS LUCAS ET AL 001006320147 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.11 DANIEL A. CONRAD (076110) ELISABETH J. HANOWSKY (252478) Law Offices of Daniel A. Conrad 1550 Bryant Street, Suite 760 San Francisco, CA 94103 || Tel: (415) 359-0900 Fax: (415) 359-0073 5} Email: dconrad@danielaconrad.com || Attorneys for THOMAS LUCAS, Trustee San Francisco County Superior Cour s nt MAY u2 2018 CL By: F THA\COy, Deplty Clark 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 10 CHRISTINE A. BENNETT, No. CGC-18-564938 " Plaintiff, _ 42 ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER v. . 13 Date: May 2, 2018 THOMAS LUCAS, and Does 1 to 40, Time: 9:30 a.m. 14 inclusive Dept.: 501 Reservation No.: 04030502-10 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 The Demurrer of Trustee Thomas Lucas to Christine A. Bennett's Verified 21] Complaint for Damages came on for hearing in Department 501 of this court on May 2, 2|| 2018. Daniel A. Conrad appeared on behalf of Thomas Lucas, Trustee of the Spinale a . trough limcted Seope Coun 23|| Family Living Trust. Christine A. Bennett appeared on-herown-behalt, Ledou a edd 24 The court reviewed the demurrer and supporting pleadings, and the opposition 25|| and reply pleadings. 264 // 27 28 ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER )1 The court heard oral argument. 2 The court finds: 3 1. All of Plaintiff's claims arise out of internal Trust matters, interpretation and 4 validity of Trust documents, and collateral attack on prior Probate Court 5 orders. 8 2. Christine Bennett does not have standing to bring any of the complaint’s 7 claims against Thomas Lucas. Good cause appearing, the court rules: 40 IT IS ORDERED: 1 1. Thomas Lucas’ demurrer to Christine Bennett's Verified Complaint for 12 Damages is sustained withoet leave to amend. wethi 1 days B 6k May 2, 20%. 15 Dated: May 2,20 IS ORDER SUSTAINING DEMURRER -2- CCAS Sl q2~