COURT FINDS THAT AU IS ENTITLED TO PRIORITY OVER THE PENAL AMOUNT OF THE BOND REMAINING AU'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART COURT FINDS THAT THERE IS A GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AS TO THE DAMAGE CLAIMS REMAINDER OF THE PENAL BOND ($41,147.33) SHALL REMAIN ON DEPOSIT WITH THE SUMMIT COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS PENDING FURTHER ORDER ALL OTHER MOTIONS ARE DENIED MMR

On July 20, 2011 a foreclosure case was filed by Michigan Precision Grading Llc, represented by Spoonster, Joseph, against American Contractors Indemnity Company, Company Wrench Ltd, Does No Address Listed, Unknown John et al. represented by Arnold, David, Brewer, Lee, Carpenter, James et al. in the jurisdiction of Summit County. Judge MARY MARGARET ROWLANDS presiding.

                        
Preview
Li, HORRIGAN AUIZNOV Uh AH & TI 1 COUNTY r COURTS IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO. MICHIGAN PRECISION GRADING, LLC : CASE NO. CV 2011-07-3930 JUDGE ROWLANDS Plaintiff, vs. : JOURNAL ENTRY QUALITY ASBESTOS, ET AL. Defendants. The controversy in this case surrounds a public project and the priority of payments to subcontractors, suppliers, and the public authority when the general contractor fails to complete the job. Defendant University of Akron filed Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on January 18, 2012 and August 27, 2012, claiming priority in the remainder of the penal amount of the bond, and disputing certain claims of Defendant Gibson Machinery and Plaintiff, Michigan Precision. Plaintiff Michigan 1Precision filed an opposition to Defendant University of Akron’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and filed for partial Summary Judgment claiming that all claimants to the penal bonds should share pro rata in the funds. Plaintiff Michigan Precision and D…

Please wait a moment while we load this page.

New Envelope