arrow left
arrow right
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
  • INDYMAC BANK FSB vs DECICCO NICHOLS, LINDA A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE - CIRCUIT (SOUTH COUNTY) document preview
						
                                

Preview

we" IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff, CASENO.® 2007 CA 007757 SC VS. DIVISION H LINDA A. DECICCO-NICHOLS A/K/A LINDA A. NICHOLS, et al, Defendant(s). NOTICE OF FILING Plaintiff, INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., gives Notice of Filing of the following: 1. Affidavit of Reasonable Attorney Fees I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U.S. Mail to all parties listed on the attached service list on this \S day of August, 2008. Default Law Group, P.L. Florida Wda/Bar No. 26139 ¢gN. Sadlak Der a3 eh 4 Boe OS re on iM ma ES co OC Hoo Ya > o> a Som §™ © “SG mW ICS = IE iT S05 om © LS = © DOC_ID: M003106 2 =. DD ~J i) FILE_ NUMBER: F0/7021616 nn mu II yinee, as . 2h IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff, . CASE NO.: 2007 CA 007757 SC VS. DIVISION: H LINDA A. DECIGCO-NICHOLS A/K/A LINDA A. NICHOLS, et al, Defendant(s). , / AFFIDAVIT AS TO REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES STATE OF FLORIDA S COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH S BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Erin Collins Cullaro, who upon first being duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: 1. I am an attorney at law duly authorized to practice in the State of Florida. 2. I have been active in the practice of law in Florida since September 22, 1995, and I am personally familiar with the fees usually allowed Plaintiffs for the services of their attorneys in suits of the kind and nature in which this affidavit is to be filed. 3. I] am familiar with Rule 4-1.5(b) of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, and have taken into consideration the factors set forth in such Rule for the determination of reasonable attorney's fees. 4. I am also familiar with and have considered the dictates of the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Florida Patient's Compensation Fund vs. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla 1985) for the determination of reasonable attorney's fees. 5. In arriving at my opinion of the value of reasonable attorney's fees in this action, J have utilized and considered the following criteria: a. The time and labor required, the novelty, complexity and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal services properly. b. The likelihood that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer. c. The fee or rate of fee customarily charged in the locality for services of a comparable or similar nature. FILE_NUMBER: F07021616 DOC_ID: M002300 MO | Iwr Au The amount involved and the results obtained. The time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances. The nature and length of the professional relationship with the client. The experience, reputation and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the services. x go m o Whether the fee is fixed or contingent. 6. Echevarria, Codilis & Stawiarski does not keep records of its time while it represents the Plaintiff pursuant to a flat fee arrangement; therefore, I have reviewed no specific time keeping records. 7. It is my opinion that a review of the actual foreclosure file of Echevarria, Codilis & Stawiarski in this case would be unnecessary and futile event. In my opinion, the specific steps and requirements for filing and litigating a mortgage foreclosure action in the State of Florida dictate that under no circumstance could the fee charged by Echevarria, Codilis & Stawiarski be unreasonable; therefore, I have not reviewed the actual file in this Case. 8. Based upon my review as set forth, it is my opinion that a reasonable attorney's fee and paralegal fee is $1,450.00. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. mae day of lly known to me. fopeg S ent was subscribed 4 , 2007, by Erin INDYMAC-FNMA-B-rhamig- F07021616 NOTARY PUBLIC. v TATE OF FLOR. T g, Lisa L. Cullarc AS EY Commission 4 “DD57754 “nnw’ Expires: JULY 2 BONDED THRU ATLANTIC BONDING 10 wiew7 Service List LINDA A. DECICCO-NICHOLS A/K/A LINDA A. NICHOLS 3106 Seattle Avenue North Port FL 34286 LINDA A. DECICCO-NICHOLS A/K/A LINDA A. NICHOLS c/o L. Murray Fitzhugh 2167 S Tamiami Trail Venice, FL 34293 ROBERT W. NICHOLS 3106 Seattle Avenue North Port, FL 34286