Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM INDEX NO. 157477/2019
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
EXHIBIT “E”
vwx¡¢ÿ¡ÿÿ
FILED:
NYSCEF
yz{ÿ}y~ÿÿ} ÿxyÿÿ{ÿ
DOC.
NEW
NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM ÿÿ
INDEX
£¡¤ÿ
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
¡¢¥ÿ¦§
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
2345676ÿ8935 ÿ9 ÿ 6ÿ2 6ÿ9 ÿ6ÿ95ÿ
893
ÿ ÿÿ9 ÿ6ÿ
ÿ 95ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ'&Fÿ)%.ÿÿ
ÿ
6 9ÿ6232ÿ 59 5 2ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ 7188097ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 4!!ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 4!!B#Cÿ'"&B#Cÿ&;ÿ)ÿÿ
ÿ
=&ÿ)!ÿ<%ÿÿ
2ÿ892 538 9ÿ$ÿ669476 ÿ8954%ÿ *&ÿ+##ÿ)!ÿ*&ÿ,&@&ÿ#ÿ>=&ÿ)!ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ='&ÿ
=
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ &
ÿ !&'ÿ#%ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
)ÿ*&ÿ+),&ÿ-&'ÿ&!&'#.ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ /01ÿ234ÿ54346/ÿ7188094:ÿ)ÿ#;&<ÿ*&ÿ=)->ÿÿ*&<ÿ=)ÿ'ÿ
)ÿ#&<,&ÿÿ=)>?ÿ)!ÿ?)@<ÿ#;&<ÿ)<ÿ!ÿ*&ÿ=)->ÿ#ÿ)ÿ#&<,&'ÿ;*ÿ*&<ÿ#@--)#ÿ)ÿ#&<,&ÿÿ
)=&ÿ)!ÿ>>&<=&ÿ)ÿ*&ÿ4!!A#ÿ )<&?B#Cÿ;*ÿÿDEÿÿ'?#ÿ!&<ÿ*&ÿ#&<,=&ÿ)!ÿ*&ÿ
#@--)#ÿ&F=@#,&ÿ)!ÿ*&ÿ'?ÿ)!ÿ#&<,=&ÿB)<ÿ;*ÿGHÿ'?#ÿ!&<ÿ*&ÿ#&<,=&ÿ#ÿ=)->&&ÿ!ÿ*&ÿ
#@--)#ÿ#ÿ)ÿ>&<#)?ÿ'&,&<&'ÿ)ÿ?)@ÿ;*ÿ*&ÿ2&ÿ)!ÿ&;ÿ)>&<ÿ)<ÿ#;&<ÿK@'"-&ÿ;ÿ+&ÿI&ÿ"#ÿ?)@ÿ+?ÿ'&!@ÿ!)<ÿ*&ÿ<&&!ÿ'&-'&'ÿ
ÿ*&ÿ=)->%ÿ
ÿ
&'.ÿ&;ÿ)+,#"%$, ?80?@ 2"' ".'$#- )0'#'' -,/,"$#
7 8+"$ "$"!! $#.' +,#"%$, .$# %"$ 80 ."#$"# %%#-'
"$= 4!#$+ 60,$ "!!* 6$$"& ;A8A
0 973 9308 6 104 79 687
6 8+"$ "$"!! $#.' +,#"%$, .$# 80 2"' $+ ,"! 6$,"-$, %
99< '$ 85$+ 0$,$ 2 ,3 2 ,3 +,#"%$, $+ '0)B-$ /,.#''
< 8+"$ "$"!! $#.' +,#"%$, .$# 80 /,"$ $+ '0)B-$ /,.#''
5 8+"$ "$"!! $#.' +,#"%$, .$# 80 -$,!! $+ '0)B-$
0$#
6"&+
jÿuvÿg
B]klm_nÿ^bmcÿ]bcÿd
CDEFGÿIEJÿKLMNÿOLPIQKÿODEMNÿRSTUVTWRWRÿRXGVYÿZ[
FILED:
NYSCEF DOC.
NEW
NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM \]^_`ÿ]bcÿdefgeghijij
INDEX NO. 157477/2019
o_m_\p_^ÿ]klm_nqÿjrhsdhijij
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
234567478ÿ
98ÿ ÿÿÿ6547ÿ434643ÿ5464ÿ ÿ5 664ÿ74ÿ234567478ÿ
8ÿ ÿÿÿ6547ÿ434643ÿ5464ÿ ÿ 7ÿ364ÿÿÿ6ÿÿ
3ÿÿ346ÿ4ÿ743647ÿÿ7337ÿÿ4ÿ3476ÿ2348ÿÿ
8ÿ ÿÿÿ6547ÿ434643ÿ5464ÿ ÿ 7ÿÿ3472764ÿ3ÿ4ÿÿ
74ÿÿ4ÿ266ÿÿÿ3437ÿÿ4ÿ3476ÿ2348ÿÿ
!"8ÿ ÿÿÿ6547ÿ434643ÿ5464ÿ ÿ 7ÿÿ3472764ÿ3ÿÿ
4ÿ74ÿÿ4ÿ266ÿÿ4ÿ3476ÿ2348ÿ
!!8ÿ #ÿÿ6547ÿ4346ÿ5464ÿ ÿ 7ÿÿ3472764ÿ3ÿ4ÿÿÿ
5264ÿ6ÿÿ443ÿ74ÿÿ747ÿ347ÿÿ34$67ÿÿÿ736ÿ673ÿ
737ÿ346$ÿÿ4ÿ74ÿÿ24377ÿÿ4ÿÿÿ4ÿ3%ÿÿ4ÿ3476ÿ2348ÿÿ
!&8ÿ 'ÿÿ434ÿ(4ÿ&)ÿ&"!ÿ*434643ÿ+4ÿ4ÿÿ4ÿ64,-ÿÿ
66$ÿ736.346ÿ66647ÿ434ÿ%6$ÿ24ÿÿ4ÿ74ÿ234567478ÿÿÿ
ÿ ÿ !/8ÿÿ 4ÿ3476ÿ66$ÿ736.346ÿ764ÿÿ736ÿ
234ÿ66ÿ4ÿ546$ÿÿ64ÿÿ#364ÿ!"ÿÿ4ÿ04ÿ13%ÿ4ÿÿ23ÿ28ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ !38ÿÿ 'ÿ4ÿ4ÿÿ4ÿ64ÿ466ÿ 7ÿ4$$4ÿ6ÿ736.346ÿ
3%ÿÿ4ÿ74ÿ23456747ÿ 64ÿ3%6$ÿ3ÿ54ÿ6#726ÿ8'0 9:8 ;'0ÿ8'948ÿ6ÿÿ
64ÿÿ/3!ÿ;36ÿ#44ÿ<!!ÿ=3>ÿ04ÿ13%ÿ!"3?8ÿ
ÿ ÿ !)8ÿÿ 'ÿ4ÿ4ÿÿ4ÿ64ÿ466ÿ 7ÿ634ÿ 4ÿ4ÿ 7ÿ73%ÿ6ÿ4ÿ
44ÿÿÿ6ÿ 64ÿ243356$ÿ67ÿÿ647ÿÿ4ÿ74ÿ234567478ÿ
ÿ ÿ !?8ÿ 4ÿ64ÿ 7ÿ74ÿÿ4ÿ4$6$44ÿ34477477ÿÿ667ÿÿÿ
4ÿ23ÿ27ÿÿ4ÿÿ04ÿ13%ÿ66$ÿÿÿ6564ÿÿ@&""ÿÿ@&3!*?-ÿÿ4ÿ
A44ÿ ÿ67ÿ$47ÿ7437ÿ452447ÿ.3ÿ647447ÿ66$ÿ337ÿÿ
Giruute G~lanlo
ÿ
....., Conr.ikz \\'11Hmad u.r
ÿ
ÿÿ sÿtuÿf ÿ
56 789:ÿ<8=ÿ>?@AÿB?CÿB78@AÿEFGHIGJEJEÿEK:ILÿMN
FILED: NEW
P^_`RaÿQU`VÿPUVÿW
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM OPQRSÿPUVÿWXYZXZ[\]\]
INDEX
bR`ROcRQÿP^_
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
`Radÿ]e[fW[\]\]
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
2345678958692ÿ 9697ÿ69ÿ8ÿ8ÿ23458ÿ65867ÿ8ÿ8ÿ8 ÿ6ÿ8ÿ5578ÿ7ÿ969ÿ8986ÿ
7ÿ7ÿ 7ÿ86ÿ96ÿ78ÿ8ÿÿ2 ÿ5ÿ86ÿ69ÿ7ÿ5327ÿ769ÿ 9887ÿ372 ÿ
5678672ÿ86ÿ28ÿ8ÿ8ÿ 69 7867ÿ5672893586769ÿ28ÿ5ÿ56728838ÿÿ79ÿ
73275ÿ7ÿ 75ÿ86ÿ8ÿ2 8ÿ6ÿ8ÿ78ÿ7ÿ5327ÿ7ÿ 9887ÿ9632ÿ7ÿ
79632ÿ5678672ÿ86ÿ28ÿ7ÿ68672ÿ6ÿ8ÿÿ7ÿ7ÿ 7ÿ86ÿ8ÿ862ÿ28 2ÿ7ÿ
2392ÿ75229ÿ86ÿ96858ÿ8ÿÿ6ÿ8ÿ78ÿ7ÿ5327ÿ8ÿ78ÿ86ÿ69ÿ7ÿ4ÿ
6ÿ7ÿÿ9632ÿ5ÿ379ÿ79632ÿ595328752ÿ8638ÿ8ÿ47 8ÿ6ÿ38ÿ
7ÿ 9698ÿ9685867ÿ69ÿ2ÿ2 8ÿ7ÿ 9ÿ7ÿ7ÿ86ÿ567289358ÿ2239ÿ3ÿ5ÿ
39ÿ997ÿ769ÿ 787ÿ8ÿ5672893586769ÿ28ÿ7ÿ8ÿ3 78ÿ89 8ÿ26ÿ2ÿ86ÿÿ
96 9ÿ9685867ÿ86ÿ8ÿ78ÿ7ÿ5327ÿ7ÿ67ÿ8ÿ78ÿ86ÿ4ÿ28935ÿ7ÿ8ÿÿ8ÿ
ÿ7ÿ894ÿ232877ÿ29632ÿ7ÿ29ÿ7392ÿ7ÿ7ÿ86ÿ72 58ÿ769ÿ96 9ÿ72 58ÿ
8ÿ69ÿ28ÿ86ÿ2 ÿ88ÿ8ÿ 2ÿ2 ÿ7ÿ96 9ÿ7ÿ7ÿ86ÿ96ÿ8ÿ78ÿ8ÿÿ7ÿ5ÿ
9685867ÿ69ÿ689ÿ2 8ÿ5ÿ5ÿ 2ÿ26ÿ567289358ÿ86ÿ96ÿ78ÿ8ÿ96 9ÿ
9685867ÿ7ÿ8ÿÿ2 ÿ5ÿ86ÿ69ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ !"ÿ #ÿ 692ÿ582ÿ7ÿ7392ÿ86ÿ78ÿ 9ÿ532ÿ26ÿ4ÿ8ÿ
775ÿ6ÿ8ÿ$ 778ÿ%#&ÿ#ÿ 692ÿ582ÿ7ÿ7392ÿ86ÿ8ÿ78ÿ 9ÿ532ÿ
26ÿ4ÿ8ÿ775ÿ6ÿ8ÿ 778ÿ%#&ÿ8638ÿ7ÿ775ÿ67ÿ8ÿ 98ÿ6ÿ8ÿ78ÿ
567894387ÿ8986ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ ()*+*,-+*ÿ78ÿ 72ÿ3 78ÿ728ÿ8ÿ$ 778ÿ%#&ÿ7ÿ8ÿ
23ÿ7ÿ522ÿ6ÿ8ÿ3925867ÿ8ÿ6ÿ82ÿ56398ÿ7ÿ69ÿ56282ÿ7ÿ24392 782ÿ6ÿ82ÿ5867ÿÿ
$ 8.ÿ/ ÿ069ÿ/ ÿ069ÿ
ÿ 13328ÿ2!ÿ3434ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ gÿhiÿY ÿ
`a bcdeÿgchÿijklÿmjngoiÿmbcklÿpqrstrupupÿpvetwÿxy
FILED: NEW
{}ÿ|ÿ{ÿ
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM z{|}~ÿ{ÿ
INDEX
}}z}|ÿ{
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
}ÿ
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
234546ÿ78ÿ9 64ÿ8ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿ
33!64ÿ"!ÿ9#$63$""ÿ
%ÿ&'('ÿ)*'ÿ
+,-ÿ/0012034,ÿ5671879:ÿ
;<<ÿ=! >? ÿ@ÿ;A3BÿC# !ÿ
D4?ÿE !FÿD4?ÿE !FÿGH;IJÿ
K;G;LÿMHGNJIHHÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
O Pÿ Q'ÿR'(RÿSÿ*TÿRUÿÿ
ÿ Iÿ=VWOX ÿYOÿ
ZVV EÿY[OO\ ÿD ]ÿE[7^ÿGHJ_Jÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ
>? @ABCÿEAFÿGHIJÿKHLEMGÿK@AIJÿNOPQRPSNSNÿNTCRUÿVW
FILED: NEW
Yghi[jÿZ^i_ÿY^_ÿ`
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM XYZ[\ÿY^_ÿ`abcacdefef
INDEX
k[i[Xl[ZÿYgh
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
i[jmÿfndo`defef
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
0123454 67138 79 84 08 84 79 4 73
671 8 79 4 73
497 4010 37 3 0
2!"#"$$ 4396 87
!%!"
80 67 0831687 ' 447254 8 6732
$!#&
08 84 79 4 73 (
671 8 79 4 73 (&&
0844 3 2 4 40) ! !##*+ !,"## # -*!.#". " #/ 60*#& $1
*2 0#!# !#&
3 $$"*,!# "& ! !&&."!# $ #/ !1 $"*, $ 384 37
7 4 73 2 !##*+& $ *.* $* #/ -!"#"$$ " #/ 1"#/" !.#"
$$"*,!# /!& *! #/ $*%"% 01557 0 ' 6752 8 ! 21& #/ .##& #/*$4
#/ &!, "& #*0 # !$$"*,!#5& 1 21% .-# !& # #/ ,!##*& #/*"6 !# # 7 !%
"$*,!#" ! 7"$ ! #/!# ! #/& ,!##*& !$$"*,!# 7"8& "## 7 #*0
9 8/"& 8*"$".!#" "& ,! 7+ !$$"*,!# ! # 7+ -!"#"$$ $* #/ *!&
#/!# -!"#"$$5& *&". "& # " #/ .0#+ 1/* !$$"*,!# ,!"#!"& /"& $$".
: 8/ %*0 $ !$$"*,!#5& 7"$ !& # ! ,!##*& # !# 0- !$$"*,!#5&
21% !* !& $1& "$*,!#" $0*"&/ 7+ -!"#"$$ ! .0&5& "8"%!#"
8/ 0*&"% !$$"*,& #/!# #/ $*%"% !#,#& !* #*0 0* #/ -!#"&
$ -*;0*+
!# 1 *2 1 *2
0%0 :3 9<9<
0#8 3 2!+ 4&=
0#"
6!%/
bÿpqÿb
xy z{|}ÿ{ÿÿ ÿ z{ÿÿ}ÿ
FILED: NEW
¡¢ÿ¡ÿÿ£
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM ÿÿ
INDEX
¤¡¥ÿ
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
¡¢¦ÿ
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
1234567ÿ
ÿ
89 ÿ9 ÿÿ ÿ8 ÿÿ ÿ 2ÿ ÿ
9ÿÿ ÿ 2ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
1 ÿ898ÿ 38ÿ ÿ
ÿ *+,-.-+/ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ!"#!$$ÿ 0123+,ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ7!"%#ÿ "6(4ÿ5'4ÿ678979:;<;<ÿ
ÿ ÿ
28ÿ8 9ÿ&ÿ1 ÿ 'ÿ ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ1($("6"#'ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ 1($("6"#ÿ28ÿ8 9ÿ&ÿ1 ÿ ÿ ==(>!"7ÿ?@ÿ
ÿ23ÿ 38ÿ&ÿ 13 ÿ!#%ÿ ##5>"(@%ÿ "%A(>!"7ÿ#B(ÿ(>!$!(6ÿ
5C=!"#ÿ5$ÿ#B(ÿ!"#!$$ÿB(>(!"4ÿ
D0,E-+2ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
6'ÿ 1("!(%ÿ"@ÿ5"5A(67(ÿ5>ÿ!"$5>C #!5"ÿ%G$$!H!("#ÿ#5ÿ$5>Cÿÿ?(!($ÿ%ÿ#5ÿ(HBÿ"6ÿ
(I(>@ÿ(7#!5"ÿH5"#!"(6ÿ!"ÿ=>7>=BJ%Kÿ6(%!7"#(6ÿLMNÿPQRÿLSNÿÿ5$ÿ#B(ÿ(>!$!(6ÿ5C=!"#'ÿ
02ÿ01/ÿ.T,ÿ01ÿ0123+,ÿETÿEU+ÿ2+VT1/ÿV0W2+ÿT.ÿ0VE-T1ÿ
T1ÿX+U0Y.ÿT.ÿ/+.+1/01E2ÿ
ÿ
;'ÿ 1("!(%ÿ"@ÿ5"5A(67(ÿ5>ÿ!"$5>C #!5"ÿ%G$$!H!("#ÿ#5ÿ$5>Cÿÿ?(!($ÿ%ÿ#5ÿ(HBÿ"6ÿ
(I(>@ÿ(7#!5"ÿH5"#!"(6ÿ!"ÿ=>7>=BJ%Kÿ6(%!7"#(6ÿLZN[ÿL\N[ÿL]N[ÿL^N[ÿL_N[ÿL`N[ÿLMMN[ÿLMaN[ÿ
LMZNPQRÿÿLM\Nÿ5$ÿ#B(ÿ(>!$!(6ÿ5C=!"#'ÿ
b'ÿ cdQedfÿdPghÿPQRÿdidjkÿPlldmPneoQÿgoQnPeQdRÿeQÿpPjPmjPphqfrÿRdfemQPndRÿLMsN[ÿLM]Nÿ
PQRÿLM^Nÿ5$ÿ#B(ÿ(>!$!(6ÿ5C=!"#'ÿ
t'ÿ 1("!(6ÿ%ÿÿuG(%#!5"ÿ5$ÿAÿ(HBÿ"6ÿ(I(>@ÿ(7#!5"ÿH5"#!"(6ÿ!"ÿ=>7>=BJ%Kÿ
RdfemQPndRÿL6bÿLÿovÿnhdÿ(>!$!(6ÿ5C=!"#ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ§¨ÿ
Z[ \]^_ÿa]bÿcdefÿgdhaicÿg\]efÿjjkjlkmlmlÿln_loÿpq
FILED: NEW
suÿtxyÿsxyÿ
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM rstuvÿsxyÿz{|}{}~
INDEX
uurutÿs
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
uÿzz~z~
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
ÿ
23ÿ245ÿ678ÿ2ÿ6983 ÿ3 282 ÿ245ÿ7 ÿ5 6 43 ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
7 294 ÿ76ÿ ÿ294 966ÿ 8 94ÿ5 6 4524 ÿÿ
2 3ÿ 74ÿ946782 974ÿ245ÿ 96ÿ23ÿ6773ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ!!"#$ÿ%&ÿ%!!'&&$!ÿ&(&ÿ%ÿ")ÿ+,-ÿ./01)+12234ÿ5 &"("#ÿ6%789"$ÿ
$#ÿÿ"$:'&";ÿ!9"7 #ÿ< &ÿ!';#ÿ"$ÿ<%9ÿ%&ÿ"$ÿ8&ÿ=>ÿÿ!&9;;$;;?ÿ!%$&"='%&>ÿ
$@9"@$!ÿ%&ÿÿ;;'78"%$ÿ%(ÿ&";Aÿ%(ÿÿB9"$"((ÿ$#ÿÿ$;< &"$@ÿC ($#$ÿ#7$#ÿÿ
+,-ÿ./01)+12234ÿD0E0F-4ÿG-ÿ0HHIJD1$@9>ÿ#"7"$";#ÿ%&ÿ#$"#ÿ
ÿ
23ÿ245ÿ678ÿ2ÿ3 745ÿ3 282 ÿ245ÿ7 ÿ5 6 43 ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
7 294 ÿ76ÿ ÿ294 966ÿ 8 94ÿ5 6 4524 ÿÿ
2 3ÿ 74ÿ946782 974ÿ245ÿ 96ÿ23ÿ6773ÿ
ÿ
Kÿ ÿÿB9"$"((?ÿ%$ÿÿ#ÿ$#ÿ"7 ÿ%(ÿÿ!!"#$ÿ"$ÿL';"%$?ÿ;;'7 #ÿÿ
&";Aÿ(%&ÿÿ!%$#'!ÿ"$ÿ<"!ÿÿ<;ÿ$@@#ÿ
ÿ
23ÿ245ÿ678ÿ2ÿ985ÿ3 282 ÿ245ÿ7 ÿ5 6 43 ÿ7ÿ ÿ
7 294 ÿ76ÿ ÿ294 966ÿ 8 94ÿ5 6 4524 ÿÿ
2 3ÿ 74ÿ946782 974ÿ245ÿ 96ÿ23ÿ6773ÿ
ÿ
Mÿ N$ÿÿO$ÿB9"$"((ÿ&!%O&;ÿÿO"!ÿ%&ÿ:'#@7 $ÿ@"$;ÿÿ$;< &"$@ÿ
C ($#$?ÿ$ÿ;"#ÿO"!ÿ%&ÿ:'#@7 $ÿ7';ÿ=ÿ'!#?ÿ8'&;'$ÿ%ÿ6BPQÿRR?ÿ=>ÿ%;ÿ
7%'$;ÿ<"!ÿOÿ= $ÿ%&ÿ<"99?ÿ<"ÿ&;%$=9ÿ!&"$>?ÿ=ÿ8"#ÿ%$ÿ=9(ÿ%(?ÿ%&ÿ"$#7$"(>?ÿ
B9"$"((ÿ"$ÿ<%9ÿ%&ÿ"$ÿ8&?ÿ(%&ÿ$>ÿ8;ÿ%&ÿ(''&ÿ!9"7 #ÿ!%$%7"!ÿ9%;;?ÿ(&%7ÿ$>ÿ!%99&9ÿ
;%'&!?ÿ"$!9'#"$@?ÿ='ÿ$%ÿ9"7"#ÿ%?ÿ$%S20T/+Uÿ1)4TJ0)H-Uÿ4IH10/ÿ4-HTJ1+VUÿWIJX-J43ÿHIEY-)40+1I)ÿ
%&ÿ789%> ÿ=$("ÿ8&%@&7;ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ{
rs tuvwÿyuzÿ{|}~ÿ|y{ÿtu}~ÿ ÿwÿ
FILED: NEW
ÿÿÿ
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM ÿÿ
INDEX
ÿ
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
ÿ
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
12ÿ145ÿ678ÿ1ÿ6798 ÿ2 181 ÿ145ÿ7 ÿ5 6 42 ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
7 14 ÿ76ÿ ÿ14 66ÿ 8 4ÿ5 6 4514 ÿÿ
1 2ÿ9 74ÿ46781 74ÿ145ÿ 6ÿ12ÿ6772ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ !!"#ÿ%&'(#)*+,(#ÿ#-ÿ.(ÿ+,(*ÿÿ/-0(ÿ0'ÿÿ1'ÿ.2ÿ'(#0ÿ0!ÿ
!!"#ÿ0/ÿ1'03043(ÿ4#ÿ*ÿ4&1.(ÿ40*&45ÿ
ÿ
12ÿ145ÿ678ÿ1ÿ66 ÿ2 181 ÿ145ÿ7 ÿ5 6 42 ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
7 14 ÿ76ÿ ÿ14 66ÿ 8 4ÿ5 6 4514 ÿÿ
1 2ÿ9 74ÿ46781 74ÿ145ÿ 6ÿ12ÿ6772ÿ
ÿ
ÿ 789ÿ:;<=;:;>?ÿ@Aÿ>89ÿÿ;Cÿ:;I;>9HÿJBH9Eÿ>89ÿ>9EICÿ@AÿKE>;L:9ÿMNÿ
@Aÿ>89ÿOPQRÿÿ
ÿ
12ÿ145ÿ678ÿ1ÿ2S ÿ2 181 ÿ145ÿ7 ÿ5 6 42 ÿ7ÿ ÿÿ
7 14 ÿ76ÿ ÿ14 66ÿ 8 4ÿ5 6 4514 ÿÿ
1 2ÿ9 74ÿ46781 74ÿ145ÿ 6ÿ12ÿ6772ÿ
ÿ
Tÿ 78<>ÿ>89ÿUÿ;BVJE;9Cÿÿÿ
ÿ
8 678 ÿG9A9BHUÿX7YÿOZ[Y7R\O7]Z[ÿ^ÿG_`_QZPa_[7ÿOZRPUÿ
H9IÿH;CI;CC;BFÿ>89ÿ`9E;A;9HÿO@IW:<;B>ÿ@Aÿ>89ÿP:<;B>;AAÿ89E9;BUÿ>@F9>89EÿD;>8ÿ>89ÿ
L@C>CÿCÿ;BLJEE9Hÿ;Bÿ>89ÿH9A9BC9ÿ@Aÿ>8;Cÿ;@Bÿ
G<>9Hbÿÿ [9Dÿc@EdUÿ[9Dÿc@Edÿ
ÿ ÿ [@e9I=9EÿMfUÿgfgfÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ c@JECÿ9>LUÿ
ÿ
ÿ
OZRR_]KUÿX][hUÿÿ
aOh][[]Yÿ^ÿQ]i_R]_Gh_ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ K>>@EB9?CÿA@EÿG9A9BHÿ
X7YÿOZ[Y7R\O7]Z[ÿ^ÿ
G_`_QZPa_[7ÿOZRPUÿ>8
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ZB9ÿj<>>9E?ÿPÿ?<@9A;ÿ?45=>ÿBBCBDCEDEDÿDF7DGÿHI
FILED: NEW
KYZ[M\ÿLP[QÿKPQÿ]
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM JKLMNÿKPQÿRSTUSUVWXWX
INDEX
^M[MJ_MLÿKYZ
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
[M\`ÿRRVRXVWXWX
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
123ÿÿ4567819ÿ47 78 2ÿ426 7 9 ÿ 562487 ÿ ÿ
ÿ 7ÿÿÿ
ÿ 9 562ÿ9ÿ7 7827847ÿ
1 ÿ !ÿ"#$%ÿ
&''ÿ"$!&(ÿÿ
6!ÿ)*ÿ6)ÿ+,&-.ÿÿ
/&+&0ÿ1,+.-,,ÿ
ÿ
]ÿabÿWS
QR STUVÿXTYÿZ[\]ÿ^[_X`Zÿ^ST\]ÿaabacbdcdcÿceVcfÿgh
FILED: NEW
jxyzl{ÿkozpÿjopÿ|
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM ijklmÿjopÿqrstrtuvwvw
INDEX
}lzli~lkÿjxy
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
zl{ÿqquqwuvwvw
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
1223456789ÿ64 1235ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ!ÿ!"ÿ!#$ÿ%&ÿ''()ÿ!#!ÿ#$ÿ(ÿÿ!!"$*ÿ"+(!$,ÿ-(!#ÿ
%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ!!"$*ÿ'"ÿ!#$ÿ$'$,!ÿ(ÿ!#$ÿ-(!#(ÿ
+!("4ÿÿ#$ÿ'"$5"(5ÿ -$ÿ(ÿ!$ÿ!"ÿ#$ÿ"- ÿ6"-7$,5$ÿ$8+$!ÿÿ!"ÿ!#$ÿ)!!$ÿ!#$$(ÿ
!!$,ÿ!"ÿ9$ÿ77$5$,ÿ"ÿ('")!("ÿ,ÿ9$7($'ÿ,ÿ!#!ÿÿ!"ÿ!#"$ÿ)!!$ÿ#$ÿ9$7($:$ÿ(!ÿ!"ÿ9$ÿ
!$4ÿ
ÿ #!ÿ!#(ÿ -$ÿ(ÿ:$('($,ÿ9*ÿ*"ÿ''()!ÿ,ÿ"!ÿ9*ÿ!#$ÿ$'$,!ÿ9$+$ÿ"ÿ
('")!("ÿ,ÿ9$7($'ÿ!#$ÿ$'$,!;ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ'"$(5ÿ+""!("<ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ+""!("ÿ"$ÿ"'ÿ-#"$ÿ"''(+$ÿ$ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ%"!*ÿ-#$$(ÿ
%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ"''(+$<ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ=ÿ ÿÿ+""!("ÿ-#"$ÿ)(ÿ"''(+$ÿ(ÿ"!ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ%"!*ÿ-#$$(ÿ%.ÿ
/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ"''(+$<ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ7()(!$,ÿÿ7(9(7(!*ÿ+")*ÿ"$ÿ"'ÿ-#"$ÿ"''(+$>)$)9$ÿ$ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ
%"!*ÿ-#$$(ÿ%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ
"''(+$<ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ7()(!$,ÿ7(9(7(!*ÿ!$#(ÿ"$ÿ"'ÿ-#"$ÿ!$ÿ$ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ%"!*ÿ
-#$$(ÿ%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ"''(+$<ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ!$#(ÿ"$ÿ"'ÿ-#"$ÿ!$ÿ$ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ%"!*ÿ-#$$(ÿ
%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ"''(+$<ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ(,(:(,7ÿ"!ÿ-(!#(ÿ!#$ÿ%"!*ÿ-#$$(ÿ%.ÿ/ÿ0%1ÿ2ÿ
3ÿ#:$ÿ!#$(ÿ"''(+$4ÿ
ÿ
ÿ 2?@ÿABCDE@AÿBFÿGFFHDIGJK8AÿHJFB)!("ÿ,ÿ!#$ÿ5",ÿ'"ÿ#$ÿ9$7($'ÿÿ!"ÿ77ÿ)!!$ÿ
"!ÿ!!$,ÿ"ÿ#$ÿ6"-7$,5$ÿ$ÿ!#$ÿ$+",ÿ,ÿ$"!ÿ"'ÿ(:$!(5!("ÿ6$!ÿ(ÿ!#$ÿ"''(+$ÿ"'ÿ!#$ÿ
(,ÿ!!"$*ÿ'"ÿ!#$ÿ$'$,!ÿ,ÿ(ÿ+" $+!("ÿ-(!#ÿ!#(ÿ+!("ÿ,ÿ!#$ÿ++(,$!ÿ"!ÿ"'ÿ-#(+#ÿ
(,ÿ+!("ÿ($4ÿ
!$,;ÿÿ $-ÿL"6ÿ$-ÿL"6ÿ
ÿ ÿ ":$)9$ÿMNÿONONÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ1P4ÿ
ÿ
rÿÿvr
XY Z[\]ÿ_[`ÿabcdÿebf_gaÿeZ[cdÿhhihjikjkjÿjl]jmÿno
FILED: NEW
qsÿrvwÿqvwÿ
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM pqrstÿqvwÿxyz{y{|}~}~
INDEX
ssp srÿq
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
sÿxx|x~|}~}~
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
1234567ÿ
ÿ
89 ÿ9 ÿÿ ÿ8 ÿÿ ÿ 2ÿ
9ÿÿ ÿ 2ÿ
ÿ
1 ÿ898ÿ 38ÿ
ÿ )*+,-)ÿ/01ÿ2*13/3*)ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ!"#!$$ÿ 4355ÿ0/ÿ6,173895,1:ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ7!"%#ÿ "6(;ÿ<=>?@A?A4BCBCÿ
ÿ ÿ
28ÿ8 9ÿ&ÿ1 ÿ 'ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ1($("6"#'ÿ
ÿ
8ÿÿÿ8=ÿ
ÿ 65*,:*ÿ7,D*ÿ-0738*Eÿ#F#ÿ#F(ÿ1($("6"#G%HÿF(I(JKÿ6(L "6G%Hÿ#F#ÿ!"#!$$G%Hÿ
%(IM(ÿN"ÿ#F(ÿO"6(I%!7"(6ÿP!#F!"ÿ#F!I#KÿGQCHÿ6K%ÿ$INLÿ#F(ÿ6#(ÿN$ÿ%(IM!R(ÿF(I(N$ÿÿ(I!$!(6ÿS!ÿ
N$ÿ I#!ROI%ÿP!#FÿI(%T(R#ÿ#Nÿ#F(ÿ$NNP!"7ÿL ##(I%=ÿ
ÿ >'ÿ 8##(ÿ#F(ÿ(;R#ÿ6#(ÿ"6ÿ#!L(ÿN$ÿ6KÿN$ÿ#F(ÿNRROII("R('ÿ
ÿ B'ÿ 1(%RI!J(ÿ#F(ÿNR#!N"ÿN$ÿ#F(ÿRR!6("#ÿ!"ÿ%O$$!R!("#ÿ6(#!ÿ#NÿT(IL!#ÿ6($!"!#(ÿ
!6("#!$!R#!N"'ÿ
ÿ Q'ÿ 8##(ÿ#F(ÿR#%ÿNIÿNL!%%!N"%ÿRN"%#!#O#!"7ÿ#F(ÿ"(7!7("R(ÿR!L(6'ÿÿ1Nÿ"N#ÿ66ÿNIÿ
!"RO6(ÿ#F(ÿTFI%(ÿNIÿ%!L!IÿTFI%(ÿUN#F(IP!%(ÿ"(7!7("#Uÿ!"ÿKNOIÿS!ÿN$ÿ I#!ROI%ÿ#Nÿ"KÿN$ÿ#F(ÿ
6(L "6%ÿNIÿ%T(R!$!RÿR#%ÿN$ÿ"(7!7("R(ÿJI(RFÿN$ÿP II"#KÿNIÿN#F(IÿRO%(%ÿN$ÿR#!N"'ÿ
ÿ V'ÿ 8##(ÿFNPÿ!#ÿ!%ÿR!L(6ÿ#F(ÿRR!6("#ÿNRROII(6'ÿ
ÿ ?'ÿ 8(#ÿ$NI#FÿJKÿFT#(IÿI#!R(ÿ8(R#!N"ÿ"6ÿTI7ITFÿ(RFÿ"6ÿ(M(IKÿ%##O#(ÿNIÿ
NI6!""R(ÿ!$ÿ"KÿPF!RFÿ!%ÿR!L(6ÿ#F(ÿ1($("6"#G%HÿM!N#(6ÿ"6ÿ6(%RI!J(ÿFNPÿ(RFÿ%(R#!N"ÿP %ÿ
(7(6KÿM!N#(6'ÿ
ÿ @'ÿ 1(%RI!J(ÿ!"ÿPF#ÿI(%T(R#%ÿ1($("6"#G%Hÿ$!(6ÿ#NÿTINM!6(ÿ!"#!$$G%HÿP!#Fÿÿ%$(ÿ
TR(ÿ#NÿPNI5'ÿ
ÿ W'ÿ 8##(ÿ$NIÿPF#ÿTOITN%(ÿ#F(ÿ!"#!$$G%HÿP %ÿN"ÿ#F(ÿTI(L!%(%ÿNIÿRN"%#IOR#!N"ÿ%!#('ÿ
ÿ
zÿÿ}y
HI JKLMÿOKPÿQRSTÿURVOWQÿUJKSTÿXXYXZY[Z[ZÿZ\MZ]ÿ^_
FILED: NEW
aopqcrÿbfqgÿafgÿs
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM `abcdÿafgÿhijkiklmnmn
INDEX
tcqc`ucbÿaop
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
qcrvÿhhlhnlmnmn
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
ÿ 12ÿ 34567894ÿ ÿ 44ÿ 475ÿ ÿ44684ÿ6882ÿ
ÿ 2ÿ 784ÿ4ÿ 4ÿÿ 885ÿ8484ÿ547857ÿÿ4ÿ9ÿ5842ÿÿÿ
2ÿ ÿÿ 885ÿ85ÿÿ4947ÿÿÿ8 ÿ5468ÿ4ÿ 4ÿÿ4ÿ8 ÿ4ÿ6 ÿ
947ÿ ÿ4ÿ 4ÿÿ4ÿ5ÿ54! 7ÿÿ4ÿ95842ÿ
2ÿ "4ÿ!447ÿ 885ÿ!8ÿ 44ÿÿ4ÿ344 5ÿ! 5ÿÿ67672ÿÿÿ
45ÿ54ÿ!447ÿ4ÿ676ÿ 44ÿ! 5ÿ!784ÿ7ÿ72ÿÿÿ4ÿ 44ÿ676ÿ! 5ÿ
!784 ÿ 4#ÿÿ6$ÿ8ÿ7 ÿ54ÿ7ÿ4ÿ595 64ÿÿ542ÿ
%2ÿ "4ÿ!447ÿ4ÿ 885ÿ!8ÿ 44ÿÿ4ÿ344 5ÿ! 5ÿ ÿ! 472ÿ
&2ÿ "4ÿ!447ÿ 885ÿ!8ÿ 44ÿÿ4ÿ344 5ÿ! 5ÿ ÿ42ÿÿÿ45ÿ
54ÿ7ÿ7ÿ!ÿ4ÿ344 5ÿ! 5ÿ 44 ÿ68ÿ5ÿ ÿ4ÿ ÿ4ÿ 74ÿÿ4ÿ
462ÿ
'2ÿ "4ÿ7ÿ46ÿ ÿ447ÿ65768 ÿ4#68ÿ7ÿ488ÿ!7(ÿ!86ÿ4ÿ
885ÿ!8ÿ 44ÿ! 5ÿÿ5ÿ65764ÿ574ÿ4)84ÿ74ÿ77 4ÿ474ÿ
ÿ664ÿ5ÿÿ784ÿ745 94ÿ ÿ4)4ÿ54ÿ548ÿ7ÿ4ÿ 47ÿ8ÿ
!86ÿ4ÿ65768 ÿ578ÿ4)88ÿ78ÿ77 8ÿ478ÿ ÿ7ÿ668ÿ
ÿ4ÿ65768 ÿ4#68*+ÿ-.ÿ/01-2343-*ÿ5-.6ÿ37ÿ8220+0/ÿ4-ÿ98:0ÿ;8<70/ÿ490ÿ=283*43>>?7ÿ
44ÿ878452ÿ
@2ÿ "4ÿ!447ÿ4ÿ 885ÿ!8ÿ 44ÿ4ÿ344 5ÿ4#476854ÿ67ÿ47ÿ
490ÿ5-.6ÿA03*+ÿB0.>-.10/ÿ84ÿ490ÿC-Aÿ7340ÿADÿ=283*43>>?7ÿ01B2-D0.EÿÿF>ÿD07ÿ74840ÿ490ÿ*8474ÿ ÿ
4#4ÿÿ4ÿ67ÿ 44 ÿ4#476854ÿ ÿ4ÿ4#6ÿ 47ÿ8ÿ!86ÿ58ÿ67ÿ! 5ÿ
4#4768542ÿ
G2ÿ 34567894ÿ4ÿ87845ÿ6 84ÿÿ94ÿ47 4ÿ8ÿ487ÿ 74ÿ ÿ654)4645ÿ8ÿ
58684ÿ48ÿÿ478ÿ4884ÿ8488682ÿ
ÿ
wÿxyÿmi
JK LMNOÿQMRÿSTUVÿWTXQYSÿWLMUVÿZZ[Z\[]\]\ÿ\^O\_ÿ`a
FILED: NEW
cqrsetÿdhsiÿchiÿu
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM bcdefÿchiÿjklmkmnopop
INDEX
vesebwedÿcqr
RECEIVED
NO. 157477/2019
setxÿjjnjpnopop
NYSCEF: 06/15/2022
ÿ
123ÿ 456ÿ7896ÿ65ÿ5 6ÿ87ÿ65ÿ6ÿÿ5ÿ5ÿ677ÿÿ875ÿÿ68ÿ5ÿ
ÿÿ68ÿ85ÿÿ56ÿ7896ÿ65ÿ65ÿ87ÿ5ÿ86ÿ87556ÿÿ567ÿ65ÿ
86ÿ68ÿ ÿ8753ÿ
13ÿ 4665ÿÿ65ÿÿ5ÿ89ÿ868ÿ87ÿ65ÿ!"#ÿ%&'ÿ!(#ÿ)*%&+"ÿ
9ÿ89ÿ85ÿ7ÿÿ59ÿÿ55,ÿ89ÿ863ÿ
1-3ÿ ./ÿ012ÿ2/ÿ&%3/ÿ%&'ÿ%''1/""ÿ0ÿ)*%&+"ÿ/34*05/16ÿ01ÿÿ"/*7585ÿ8ÿ
665ÿ6 ÿ65ÿ5ÿÿ95ÿ59ÿ ÿ65ÿ677ÿÿ8 ÿ53ÿ
893ÿ :5 6ÿ87ÿ65ÿ7ÿÿ677ÿÿ665ÿ798ÿ5856ÿ89ÿ
8683ÿ
813ÿ 4665ÿ677;ÿ65ÿ87ÿ96ÿ8ÿ596ÿ59ÿ9556ÿ95ÿÿ95ÿ
ÿ5ÿ8ÿ65ÿ87ÿ65ÿ563ÿ
ÿ 883ÿ <ÿ66556ÿ87ÿ65ÿ=95ÿÿ685ÿ5ÿ68ÿ5ÿ5956ÿÿ6953ÿ
ÿ 8>3ÿ .%/ÿÿ)*%&!"#ÿ2%'ÿ41/?0@"*5ÿ&A@1/'ÿ%&5ÿ0ÿ20"/ÿ4%1"ÿ0ÿ)*%&+"ÿ(0'5ÿ
5ÿ68ÿB5ÿ55ÿ=95ÿÿ65ÿ56ÿÿ7ÿ8ÿ 5ÿÿ83ÿ
ÿ 8C3ÿ <ÿ68ÿÿ5D55ÿ995ÿÿÿ956ÿ87ÿ65ÿ89955ÿ665ÿ65ÿ86ÿÿ
65ÿ87ÿ695656ÿ89ÿ59B5ÿÿ958ÿ87Eÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ;ÿ59B5ÿ66 ÿ5965ÿ65ÿ86ÿ87ÿ5ÿ8689;ÿFÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ5ÿ5Fÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ86ÿ5D55Fÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ95;ÿ59B5Fÿ
ÿ ÿ 5ÿ8ÿ87ÿ59 ÿÿ8ÿ865Fÿ
ÿ ÿ 7ÿÿ8659ÿ65ÿ87ÿ5ÿ53ÿ
ÿ 8G3ÿ 4665ÿ 5659ÿH5756ÿÿ865ÿ87ÿ65ÿ868ÿ85ÿ87ÿÿ7ÿ8ÿ
665ÿ 5659ÿ6ÿ89ÿ8696B5ÿ865ÿÿ53ÿI7ÿ8696B5ÿ865ÿÿ5ÿ665ÿ789ÿ
8ÿ8 ÿ677ÿÿ65ÿ55ÿ868ÿ5D65ÿ57895ÿ65ÿ55ÿ56Fÿ7ÿ6ÿ
865ÿÿ5ÿ665ÿÿ 8ÿÿ68ÿ 8ÿÿ865ÿÿ55ÿB5ÿÿ65ÿ5ÿÿ
65ÿ6ÿÿB5ÿÿ 5659ÿ89ÿ89ÿ9665ÿÿ7ÿ9665ÿ56ÿ7896ÿÿ8ÿ6595873ÿ
ÿ
yÿz{ÿok
@A BCDEÿGCHÿIJKLÿMJNGOIÿMBCKLÿPPQPRQSRSRÿRTERUÿVW
FILED: NEW
Yghi[jÿZ^i_ÿY^_ÿk
NYSCEF DOC. NO.
YORK
39
COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2022 11:13 AM XYZ[\ÿY^_ÿ`abcacdefef
INDEX
l[i[Xm[ZÿYgh
Related Content
in New York County
Case
Shakina Sumi, Mohammad Khan v. Reena Parikh M.D., Sasha H. Beovich P.A., Erica Burke Pa-C, Katrina Bradley M.D., Eun-Je Lee M.D., The New York And Presbyterian Hospital
Jul 08, 2024 |
Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice |
Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice |
805191/2024
Case
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. All City Family Healthcare Center, Inc., American Medical Initiatives, P.C., Barry A. Baker, M.D., Central Supplies Of Ny Corp., Centurion Midtown Medical, Pllc, City Medical Of Upper East Side, Pllc, Ds Msk Consultants, Inc., Esther Chaim Medical, P.C., Ezrah Medical, P.C., Health Wellness Medical Services, Pllc, Ipills Pharmacy, Inc., Laboratory Corporation Of America Holdings A/K/A Labcorp Of America, Medex Diagnostic And Treatment Center, Llc, Modern Wellness Np In Family Health, P.L.L.C., Mosaic Diagnostic Imaging, Pllc, Naturalife Chiropractic, P.C., Nextstep Healing, Inc., Portal Medical, P.C., Right Choice Supply, Inc., Right Motion P.T., P.C., Sedation Vacation Perioperative Medicine, Pllc, U.K. Sinha Physician, P.C., Upendra Sinha, M.D., Nilhec J. Diaz, Kervin Omar Otero Nieves
Jul 11, 2024 |
Torts - Other (Declaratory Judgment) |
Torts - Other (Declaratory Judgment) |
156321/2024
Ruling
K. QUILLIN VS. NOELLE BECKER MORENO ET AL
Jul 10, 2024 |
CGC24611734
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Wednesday, July 10, 2024, Line 11. DEFENDANT NOELLE MORENO's MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT. Off calendar for noncompliance with Local Rule 2.7(B) (courtesy copies). The motion may be re-set for a Mon.-Thurs. after July 24, with papers to bear new hearing date. For the 9:30 a.m. Law & Motion calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/RBU)
Ruling
ARMEN BEGOYAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.
Jul 11, 2024 |
21STCV34525
Case Number:
21STCV34525
Hearing Date:
July 11, 2024
Dept:
32
PLEASE NOTE
:
Parties are encouraged to meet and confer concerning this tentative ruling to determine if a resolution may be reached.
If the parties are unable to reach a resolution and a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling, the party must send an email to the Court at
sscdept32@lacourt.org
indicating that partys intention to submit.
The email shall include the case number, date and time of the hearing, counsels contact information (if applicable), and the identity of the party submitting on this tentative ruling.
If the Court does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may place the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.
If all parties do not submit on this tentative ruling, they should arrange to appear in-person or remotely.
Further, after the Court has posted/issued a tentative ruling, the Court has the inherent authority to prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion and adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court
.
TENTATIVE RULING
DEPT
:
32
HEARING DATE
:
July 11, 2024
CASE NUMBER
:
21STCV34525
MOTIONS
:
Motion for Terminating Sanctions
MOVING PARTY:
Defendant City of Los Angeles
OPPOSING PARTY:
None
BACKGROUND
Defendant City of Los Angeles (
Defendant) moves for terminating sanctions against Plaintiff
Armen Begoyan (Plaintiff) for failure to comply with the Courts April 26, 2024 discovery order. Defendant seeks to dismiss the entire action. No opposition has been filed.
LEGAL STANDARD
To the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method or any other provision of this title, the court, after notice to any affected party, person, or attorney, and after opportunity for hearing, may impose&sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc. section 2023.030.) The court may impose a terminating sanction for misuse of the discovery process by any of the following: (1) An order striking out the pleadings or parts of the pleadings of any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process; (2) An order staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed; (3) An order dismissing the action, or any part of the action, of that party; (4) An order rendering a judgment by default against that party. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2023.030(d).)
Failing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery, or
disobeying a court order to provide discovery,
constitutes a misuse of the discovery process. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (d), (g).)
The trial court may order a terminating sanction for discovery abuse after considering the totality of the circumstances: [the] conduct of the party to determine if the actions were willful; the detriment to the propounding party; and the number of formal and informal attempts to obtain the discovery. (
Los Defensores, Inc. v. Gomez
(2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 377, 390, quoting
Lang v. Hochman
(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1246.)
Generally, [a] decision to order terminating sanctions should not be made lightly.
But where a violation is willful, preceded by a history of abuse, and the evidence shows that less severe sanctions would not produce compliance with the discovery rules, the trial court is justified in imposing the ultimate sanction. (
Los Defensores, supra
, 223 Cal. App. 4th at p. 390 [citation omitted].)
Under this standard, trial courts have properly imposed terminating sanctions when parties have willfully disobeyed one or more discovery orders. (
Los Defensores, supra
, 223 Cal.App.4th at p. 390 citing
Lang, supra
, 77 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1244-1246 [discussing cases]; see, e.g.,
Collisson & Kaplan v. Hartunian
(1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 1611, 1617-1622 [terminating sanctions imposed (by striking the defendants Answer and subsequently granting default judgment) after defendants failed to comply with one court order to produce discovery];
Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange
(1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, 491, disapproved on other grounds in
Garcia v. McCutchen
(1997) 16 Cal.4th 469, 478, n. 4 [terminating sanctions imposed against the plaintiff for failing to comply with a discovery order and for violating various discovery statutes].)
If a party . . . fails to obey an order compelling answers [to interrogatories or requests for production], the court may make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010). In lieu of or in addition to that sanction, the court may impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010). (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 2030.290(c); 2031.300(c).)
DISCUSSION
Written discovery was originally served on Plaintiff on March 1, 2023. (Kahramanian Decl. ¶ 2.) On September 21, 2023 and January 11, 2024, Defendants counsel emailed Plaintiffs counsel requesting responses but received no response. (
Id.
¶ 3.)
On April 26, 2024, the Court granted
Defendants unopposed motion to compel Plaintiffs responses to Demand for Production of Documents, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Form Interrogatories, Set One. Plaintiff was ordered to provide verified responses, without objections, within 10 days. (Min. Order, 4/26/24.) The Court also imposed $700.00 in monetary sanctions against Plaintiff and his counsel of record.
On May 2, 2024, Defendant filed and served electronic notice of the ruling on Plaintiffs counsel. Defendant contends that no responses have been served complying with the Courts order. (Kahramanian Decl. ¶ 4.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to this motion.
Therefore, it appears that the discovery was first served in March 2023, and the motion to compel was granted on April 26, 2024. Throughout this time, Defendant sought to obtain responses through informal ways before ultimately obtaining an order to compel. The delay in time also demonstrates that Defendant has been prevented from mounting a defense against this case. Considering the above, the fact Plaintiff did not oppose this motion nor the previous motion to compel, and monetary sanctions have been ineffective, the Court finds Plaintiffs actions to be willful. Therefore, the motion for terminating sanctions is granted.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, Defendant
City of Los Angeles
motion for terminating sanctions is GRANTED. The only remaining defendants are Doe Defendants who have not been named or served, and therefore t
he Court orders the complaint dismissed in its entirety.
If Defendant moves to dismiss the cross-complaint at the hearing on this motion, then the Final Status Conference and Jury Trial dates will be advanced and vacated.
Defendant shall provide notice of the Courts ruling and file a proof of service of such.
Ruling
Gilbert Hernandez vs. In-Shape Health Clubs, LLC
Jul 11, 2024 |
20CV-02521
20CV-02521 Gilbert Hernandez v. In-Shape Health Clubs LLC
Trial Settng Conference
Appearance required. Remote appearances are permitted. Parties who wish to appear
remotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to arrange for a remote
appearance. Appear to address the status of case following the unsuccessful mediation
and whether it is time to set this matter for trial.
Ruling
SOCORRO ALEGRIA VS ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
Jul 11, 2024 |
24PSCV00032
Case Number:
24PSCV00032
Hearing Date:
July 11, 2024
Dept:
K
1.
Defendant AltaMed Health Services Corporations Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is summarily GRANTED in part (i.e., as to the fifth, sixth and tenth causes of action) and otherwise DENIED in part (i.e., as to the eighth and ninth causes of action).
2.
Defendant AltaMed Health Services Corporations Motion to Strike is DENIED as MOOT.
Background
Plaintiff Socorro Alegria (Plaintiff) alleges as follows: Plaintiff was sexually assaulted during her March 22, 2023 medical imaging appointment. On January 3, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against AltaMed Health Services Corporation (AltaMed), Jose Luis Sanchez and Does 1-20 for:
1.
Negligent Hiring Retention, Supervision and Failure to Terminate (v. AltaMed only)
2.
Common Law Assault (v. Sanchez only)
3.
Common Law Battery (v. Sanchez only)
4.
Sexual Battery in Violation of Civil Code § 1708.5 (v. Sanchez only)
5.
Violation of Civil Code § 51.7
6.
Sexual Harassment in Violation of Civil Code § 51.9
7.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (v. Sanchez only)
8.
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
9.
Negligence (v. AltaMed only)
10.
Violation of the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act A Case Management Conference is set for July 11, 2024.
1.
Judgment on the Pleadings
Legal Standard
The rules governing demurrers are generally applicable to a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (
Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
(1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999; Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (d) [The grounds for motion. . . shall appear on the face of the challenged pleading or from any matter of which the court is required to take judicial notice. Where the motion is based on a matter of which the court may take judicial notice. . ., the matter shall be specified in the notice of motion, or in the supporting points and authorities, except as the court may otherwise permit].)
A motion by a plaintiff may only be made on the grounds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause or causes of action against the defendant and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(1)(A).) A motion by a defendant may only be made on the grounds that (1) [t]he court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the cause of action alleged in the complaint or (2) [t]he complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c).)
Although a nonstatutory motion may be made at any time either prior to the trial or at the trial itself (
Stoops v. Abbassi
(2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 644, 650 [quotation marks and citation omitted]), a statutory motion cannot be made after entry of a pretrial conference order or 30 days before the initial trial date, whichever is later, unless the court otherwise permits. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (e).)
Discussion
AltaMed moves the court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 438, for judgment on the pleadings as to the fifth, sixth, and eighth through tenth (i.e., for
Violation of Civil Code § 51.7, Sexual Harassment in Violation of Civil Code § 51.9, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, Negligence and Violation of the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, respectively)
causes of action in Plaintiffs complaint, on the basis that they each fail to state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action.
At the outset, Plaintiff represents that she agrees to dismiss her fifth, sixth and tenth causes of action, without prejudice (Opp., 1:26-2:2); accordingly, in the event a Request for Dismissal is not on file by the time of the hearing, the court will summarily grant the motion in this regard.
The courts following analysis, then, is limited to Plaintiffs eighth and ninth causes of action, for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress and Negligence, respectively:
AltaMed asserts that these causes of action fail because it cannot be held vicariously liable for an alleged sexual assault by its employee. [A]n employer is vicariously liable for the torts of its employees committed within the scope of the employment. (
Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital
(1995) 12 Cal.4th 291, 296.) However, [a]n
employer will not be held liable for an assault or other intentional tort that did not have a causal nexus to the employee's work. (
Id.
at 297).
The court construes Plaintiffs eighth and ninth causes of action as sounding in direct negligence, rather than vicarious liability. Further, while AltaMed contends that these causes of action are surplusage, this argument was raised for the first time in the reply; as such, it is disregarded. The motion is denied in this regard.
2.
Motion to Strike
AltaMed moves the court for an order striking out the following language from Plaintiffs complaint:
1.
Page 12, paragraph 68, lines 6-12;
2.
Page 13, paragraph 79, lines 9-15;
3.
Page 16, paragraph 102, lines 18-24;
4.
Page 17, paragraph 7, line 13;
5.
Page 17, paragraph 9, line 15;
6.
Page 17, paragraph 10, line 16. AltaMeds request is denied as moot. All of the allegations AltaMed seeks to have stricken pertain to the fifth, sixth and tenth causes of action, which Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss.
Ruling
Thompson, Harry Fayne III vs. Rose, Steven Leon et al
Jul 22, 2024 |
S-CV-0052451
S-CV-0052451 Thompson, Harry Fayne III vs. Rose, Steven Leon et al
No appearance required. CMC is continued to 10/14/24 at 2pm in Dept. 6.
Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading, default or dismissal as to
Defendant(s): Grossman, Marilyn Joy
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Rose, Steven
Leon
Ruling
TODD BERTRANG, ET AL. VS IVORY HOLDINGS, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
Jul 09, 2024 |
21STCV42736
Case Number:
21STCV42736
Hearing Date:
July 9, 2024
Dept:
S25 Procedural Background Plaintiffs, Todd Bertrang (Bertrang) and Ophie Beltran (Beltran) (collectively, Plaintiffs) sued Defendants, Lido Sailing Club, Inc. (Lido), Ivory Holdings, LLC (Ivory), and Scott Vollero (Vollero) based on injuries Plaintiffs allege they sustained from Bertrangs exposure to hazardous chemicals. Plaintiffs filed their original complaint on November 18, 2021, and filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) on May 4, 2022. Notably, Plaintiffs did not serve any party prior to filing their FAC, and no party responded to the original complaint. On September 8, 2022, the Court sustained Lido Sailing Club, LLCs demurrer to the FAC with leave to amend. (September 8, 2022 Minute Order.) On September 30, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint (SAC). On October 5, 2022, Lido filed a demurrer to the SAC. Shortly thereafter, the personal injury hub court found the case complicated and transferred it to Long Beach for all further proceedings. On January 12, 2023, Lido re-filed its demurrer to the SAC in Department S27. On June 27, 2023, the Court continued the hearing on the demurrer, finding the parties had not adequately met and conferred prior to filing their papers. On July 27, 2023, the Court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend. On September 20, 2023, rather than amending the SAC, Plaintiffs dismissed Lido from the case. On December 21, 2023, Defendants Ivory Holdings and Vollero filed a demurrer with the motion to strike portions of the SAC. On January 23, 2024, the Court sustained the demurrer with leave to 20 days amend as to the NIED cause of action and alter ego liability cause of action and overruled the strict liability for ultrahazardous activity cause of action, the violation of Health and Safety Code, § 25359.7, cause of action and the IIED cause of action; the Court also granted the motion to strike without leave to amend as to punitive damages and related allegations. (January 23, 2024 Minute Order.) On April 24, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint (TAC) more than two months after the Courts January 23 order. Meet and Confer Defendant Volleros counsel states that he sent a meet and confer letter to Plaintiffs counsel on May 17, 2024 detailing issues with the TAC and his availability for a telephonic meet and confer at least 5 days prior to filing the instant motions. (Rasmussen Decl.1, ¶ 5, Exh. B.) Defendant Volleros counsel states that Plaintiffs counsel did not respond to the meet and confer attempt. (Id., at ¶ 6.) In opposition, Plaintiffs counsel argues Defendant Volleros counsel failed to meet and confer because the issues were not discussed in person or by telephone as required under Code Civ. Proc., §§ 430.41, 435.5. Notwithstanding the parties conflicting ideas of meet and confer, it is very likely an informal attempt to resolve the matter would have been unsuccessful. Analysis 1. Delay in Filing of Third Amended Complaint Code Civ. Proc., § 472b, states that: [w] hen a demurrer to any pleading is sustained or overruled, and time to amend or answer is given, the time so given runs from the service of notice of the decision or order, unless the notice is waived in open court, and the waiver entered in the minutes. (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2024) ¶ 7:145; Cano v. Glover (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 326, 329-330.) After expiration of the time in which a pleading can be amended as a matter of course, the pleading can only be amended by obtaining the permission of the court. (Leader v. Health Indus. of Am., Inc. (2001) 89 Cal. App. 4th 603, 613.) While a court has discretion to require a noticed motion before permitting a plaintiff to file an amended complaint late, a court also has the discretion to accept a filing without a noticed motion. (Harlan v. Dep't of Transportation (2005) 132 Cal. App. 4th 868, 873.) The Court exercises its discretion and accepts Plaintiffs untimely filed Third Amended Complaint without a noticed motion. 2. Second Amended Complaint Holding (Alter Ego) On January 23, 2024, Judge Mark Kim sustained Defendant Volleros Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend. Judge Kim ruled: All claims against Volero are plead on an alter ego theory. Plaintiffs alter ego allegations are found at ¶6 of the SAC, and merely allege that each defendant was acting as the alter ego of each other defendant. Relying on Rutherford Holdings, LLC v. Playa del Rey (2014) 223 Cal.App. 221, 236, Judge Kim held: Plaintiffs herein failed to allege any of the ultimate facts showing alter ego liability. They failed to allege unity of interest, domination and control, inadequate capitalization, etc. Voleros demurrer is therefore sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs must allege ultimate facts showing imposition of liability against Volero would be proper. (See January 23, 2024 Minute Order, Legal Standard on Demurrer, Alter Ego Liability, 3(h)). 3. Demurrer to the Third Amended Complaint (Alter Ego) A demurrer is a pleading used to test the legal sufficiency of other pleadings. It raises issues of law, not fact, regarding the form or content of the opposing partys pleading. It is error for the trial court to sustain a demurrer if the plaintiff has stated a cause of action under any possible legal theory, and it is an abuse of discretion for the court to sustain a demurrer without leave to amend if the plaintiff has shown there is a reasonable possibility a defect can be cured by amendment. California Logistics, Inc. v. State of California (2008) 161 Cal. App. 4th 242, 247. The burden is on the complainant to show in what manner and how that amendment will change the legal effect of the pleading. (Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d 335, 349.) Plaintiffs allegations of alter ego in the TAC are found at ¶ 3 and 6. These allegations are identical to the alter ego allegations found at ¶ 3 and ¶6 of the SAC. No additional facts or allegations have been added by Plaintiffs. As discussed, Judge Kim found those allegations deficient as Plaintiff failed to allege any of the ultimate facts showing alter ego liability and failed to allege unity of interest, domination and control, inadequate capitalization. (January 23, 2024 Minute Order). In sum, Plaintiffs completely failed to amend or modify their operative pleading in any manner or in compliance with Judge Kims ruling. In Plaintiffs opposition, Plaintiffs request leave to amend by suggesting three new facts, previously unknown, support the theory of alter ego between Vollero and Ivory Holdings. These facts are: (1) and (2) on August 16, 2016, two separate Deeds of Trust were recorded against the subject premises with Vollero as the Beneficiary and (3) Vollero, as an individual, performed the alleged remediation of the toxic chemicals which are alleged to have harmed Plaintiffs. Assuming the new facts found in Plaintiffs Opposition are true, Plaintiffs have not met their burden demonstrating how or in what manner these new allegations support of finding that a reasonable possibility exist for Plaintiffs to cure the defects and successfully pled a theory of alter ego. (Reeder v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 795, 805.) These additional facts show no connection between Vollero and Ivory Holdings. Even with the inclusion of those three allegations, Plaintiffs operative pleading would fail to allege any of the ultimate facts showing an alter ego theory as set forth in Rutherford (e.g. allegations of unity of interest, domination and control, inadequate capitalization). 4. Ruling The Court sustains Defendant Volleros Demurrer without leave to amend. Defendant Volleros motion to strike is now moot.
Ruling
Luis Kutz, et al vs Jennifer Fribourgh, et al
Jul 11, 2024 |
23CV01711
23CV01711
KUTZ et al. v. FRIBOURGH et al.
(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO BE RELIEVED
The unopposed motions are denied without prejudice. Counsel must refile to reflect
correct upcoming hearing dates in the declarations and proposed orders.
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order
incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the
tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in
accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the
prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative is
simply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of
sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
Page 1 of 1
Ruling
Dryden, Donna vs Tri Counties Bank
Jul 10, 2024 |
23CV03115
23CV03115 Dryden, Donna et al. v. Tri Counties Bank
EVENT: Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate and Appoint Interim Class Counsel
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate and Appoint Interim Class Counsel is GRANTED. Defendant
shall file a responsive pleading within 60 days of the date of this order. The Court will sign the
proposed order with the noted modification.
Document
Patrick Strickland v. W.I.P. Club, Inc., Barry Mullineaux, Collective Hardware, Inc., John Bakhishi, Lina Kay, Hirukuni Sai, John C. Best, Frank Porco, Merlin Bobb-Willis, 150 Rft Varick Corp., 150 Rft Varick Basement Llc, W. & M. Operating, L.L.C., Aubrey Graham Drake a/k/a DRAKE, Allstar Security & Consulting, Inc., Christopher Maurice Brown a/k/a CHRIS BROWN
Apr 08, 2013 |
Anil Singh
|
Tort |
Tort |
153185/2013
Document
Melania Rodriguez and RYAN LUNT, as Parents and Natural Guardians of Z.L, Melania Rodriguez, Ryan Lunt Individually v. Nicholas James Buffin M.D., Valerie Lewis-Morris M.D., Emily Schmidt-Beuchat M.D., Hope S. Langer M.D., Youyin Choy M.D., Lois Brustman M.D., Susan Rothenberg M.D., Helaine Worrell M.D., Mount Sinai West, West Care Medical, P.C.,, Faculty Practice Associates-Mount Sinai Hospital,, Midtown Ob/Gyn
Mar 15, 2021 |
John J. Kelley
|
Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice |
Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice |
805086/2021