Preview
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF SUFFOLK
---------------------------------------------------------------------x
HARRY J. HAMPSON, Index No.: 606219/2021
GENERAL ELECTRIC
Plaintiff(s), COMPANY'S VERIFIED
-against- ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES, CROSS-CLAIMS,
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC, n/k/a RHONE POULENC AND ANSWER TO CROSS-
AG COMPANY, n/ k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC., et CLAIMS
al.,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------x
COUNSELORS:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant General Electric Company (hereinafter “GE”),
by its attorneys, Tanenbaum Keale LLP, hereby answers Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint
(hereinafter "Complaint") as follows:
1. GE is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 of the Complaint and leaves the plaintiff to his proofs.
2. The statements contained in paragraph 2 of Plaintiff’s Complaint do not require any
admissions or denials as said statements merely define "Defendants" as used within the context of
Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint.
3. GE, other than admitting it is a New York Corporation, denies the remaining
allegations contained in paragraphs 3 through 23 of Plaintiff’s Complaint to the extent they pertain
to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
allegations to the extent they pertain to any other defendant in this action. GE also refers all
conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 3 through 23 to the Court.
1 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS,
GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
4. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 23 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 24 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
5. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 25 through 43 of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form
a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action.
GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 25 through 43 to the Court.
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS,
GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
6. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 43 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 44 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
7. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 45 through 49 Plaintiff’s
Complaint to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form
a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action.
GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 45 through 49 to the Court.
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL
DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
8. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 49 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 50 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
2 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
9. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 51 through 59 of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form
a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action.
GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 51 through 59 to the Court.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL OTHER
DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
10. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 59 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 60 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
11. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 61 through 70 of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to
any other party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 61
through 70 to the Court.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS
FOLLOWS:
12. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 70 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 71 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
13. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 72 through 89 of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to
other party or third party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in
paragraphs 72 through 89 to the Court.
3 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
AGAINST DEFENDANT ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS
FOLLOWS:
14. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation
contained in paragraphs 1 through 89 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if
fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 90 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
15. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 91 and 92 of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or
information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to
other party or third party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in
paragraphs 91 and 92 to the Court.
AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
16. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to contain any allegations whatsoever against GE, and
fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against GE.
AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
17. That GE acted reasonably and with due care toward Plaintiff.
AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
18. That GE owed no duty to Plaintiff.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
19. That GE violated no duty owed to Plaintiff.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
20. That at all times relevant hereto, GE complied with all applicable laws, regulations
and standards.
4 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
21. In the event that Plaintiff relies on New York Law, L. 1986 C. 682 Sections 4 and
12 as grounds for maintaining this action, these sections are unconstitutional and this action is time
barred.
AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
22. The claims are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel.
AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
23. That GE was not served in accordance with the provisions of the New York Civil
Practice Law and Rules and therefore Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed due to insufficient
process and insufficient service of process.
AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
24. Plaintiff’s Complaint contains no information regarding dates of exposure, injury
or diagnosis, or any other information necessary to determine whether Plaintiff’s claims were
timely filed. GE asserts the claims may be barred under the terms of any relevant statutes of
limitations or repose from the jurisdiction or jurisdictions whose limitations or repose provisions
govern.
AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
25. Plaintiff have failed to plead any basis for claims of misrepresentation, deliberate
concealment, or fraud against GE, much less state such claims with the specificity required by the
New York Civil Practice Law and Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
26. That one or more of the causes of action have not been maintained in a timely
fashion and Plaintiff have neglected the same and should be barred by the doctrine of laches.
5 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
27. That any injuries and/or damages sustained by the Plaintiff, as alleged in Plaintiff’s
Complaint herein, were caused in whole or in part by the contributory negligence and/or culpable
conduct of said Plaintiff and not as a result of any contributory negligence and/or culpable conduct
on the part of the answering defendant, which either bars or reduces Plaintiff’s claims herein an
amount to be determined by the trier of fact.
AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
28. If Plaintiff sustained any injury as alleged, which is denied, the same resulted, upon
information and belief, from their own negligence in failing to care for their own health by using
tobacco products over an extended period of time. The use of said tobacco products is the sole,
direct and proximate cause, or a contributing cause, of the alleged injury or damage, if any, about
which Plaintiff complain.
AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
29. If Plaintiff sustained any injuries or damages as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint, all
of which GE specifically denies, then such injuries and damages were caused or contributed to by
reason of the negligence of said Plaintiff, by reason of, but not limited to, said Plaintiff’s failure to
wear a respirator, engage in safe work practices or to protect themselves adequately from risk of
harm.
AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
30. If Plaintiff sustained any injury or damage, which is denied, then such injury or
damage were proximately caused or contributed to by exposure to and inhalation of noxious and
deleterious fumes and residues from industrial products and by-products prevalent on Plaintiff’s
6 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
job sites and substances other than those manufactured or sold by GE, if any, and by cumulative
exposure to all types of environmental and industrial pollutants of air and water.
AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
31. Insofar as Plaintiff’s Complaint and each cause of action considered separately
allege a cause of action accruing before September 1, 1975, each such cause of action is barred by
reason of the culpable conduct attributable to Plaintiff, including contributory negligence and
assumption of the risk.
AS AND FOR A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
32. This action may be barred by the applicable state and/or federal industrial insurance
and/or worker's compensation laws which may provide an exclusive remedy for the damages
which Plaintiff allegedly sustained, if any.
AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
33. In the event that Plaintiff were employed by this answering defendant, Plaintiff’s
sole and exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Law of the State of New York.
AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
34. That the accident and injuries complained of in the Plaintiff’s Complaint were
caused or brought about by the negligence of a third person or persons over whom this answering
defendant had no control and for whose acts the answering defendant was in no way responsible.
AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
35. That by entering into the activity in which the Plaintiff were engaged at the time of
the occurrence set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint, said Plaintiff knew the hazards thereof and the
inherent risks incident thereto and had full knowledge of the dangers thereof; that whatever injuries
and damages were sustained by the Plaintiff herein as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint arose from
7 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
and were caused by the reason of such risks voluntarily undertaken by the Plaintiff in their
activities and such risks were assumed and accepted by them in performing and engaging in said
activities.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
36. There should be no recovery against GE because of any failure to warn or
inadequacy of warning because, upon information and belief, at all times pertinent to Plaintiff’s
claims, said Plaintiff were possessed of or should have been possessed of good and adequate
knowledge which negated any need for said warning and/or Plaintiff were required to follow
specific written safety procedures as established by their employers which negated the need or
requirement for any such warning.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
37. Whatever damages Plaintiff may have suffered, if any, were solely or proximately
caused by the Plaintiff when they assumed and voluntarily exposed themselves to specific and
appreciated risks pursuant to the doctrine of volenti non fitinjuria and assumption of risk, for
which Plaintiff are barred from receiving damages, or, in the alternative, for which recovery is
reduced.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
38. That after the product(s) left the control of this answering defendant, they were
subject to abuse, alteration, change, improper installation or operation by persons not in the employ
or control of this defendant; which alteration, change, abuse, improper installation or operation
proximately caused the injuries complained of by Plaintiff in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Such change
in condition bars the action as against this defendant.
8 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
39. The alleged injuries and damages of which the Plaintiff complain were caused by
unauthorized, unattended, or improper use of the products complained of, and as a result of failure
to exercise reasonable and ordinary care, caution and vigilance for which GE is not liable or not
responsible.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
40. That any oral warranties upon which Plaintiff allegedly relied are inadmissible and
unavailable because of the provisions of the applicable Statute of Frauds.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
41. That Plaintiff, their coworkers or employers misused, abused, mistreated and
misapplied the product(s) designated as asbestos material as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint
herein.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
42. Whatever damages Plaintiff may have suffered, if any, were due solely or in part to
the failure of Plaintiff’s employers to take adequate precautions and provide Plaintiff with a safe
place to work.
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
43. While this answering defendant denies the allegations of Plaintiff with respect to
negligence, statutory liability, strict liability, injury and damages, to the extent that Plaintiff may
be able to prove the same, they were the result of intervening and/or interceding acts of superseding
negligence on the part of third-parties over which this defendant had neither control nor right of
control and are not recoverable as against this defendant.
9 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A TWENTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
44. In accordance with CPLR 1601 et seq., the liability of this answering defendant, if
any, to the Plaintiff for non-economic loss is limited to this defendant’s equitable share, determined
in accordance with the relative culpability of all persons or entities contributing to the total liability
for non-economic loss, including named parties and others over whom Plaintiff could have
obtained personal jurisdiction with due diligence.
AS AND FOR A THIRTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
45. In the event Plaintiff recover a verdict or judgment against the defendant, then said
verdict or judgment must be reduced pursuant to CPLR 4545(c) by those amounts which have
been, or will, with reasonable certainty, replace or indemnify Plaintiff, in whole or in part, for any
past or future claimed economic loss, from any collateral source such as insurance, social security,
workers compensation or employee benefit programs.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
46. If Plaintiff have heretofore settled or should hereafter settle or have any judgment
rendered in their favor for any of their alleged injuries and damages with any entity, then GE is
entitled to a setoff in the amount of said settlement.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
47. Plaintiff contributed to their illness and/or injuries, in whole or in part, by the use
of other substances, product, drugs or medications.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
48. The place of trial of this action is stated for an improper venue.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
49. In the event it should be proven at the time of trial that this answering defendant is
10 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
subject to market share liability, then this defendant’s respective share of such liability would be
of such a de minimus amount as to make its contribution for damages negligible and this defendant
would be entitled to contribution, either in whole or in part, from the co-defendants not represented
by this answer.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
50. At all times material to Plaintiff’s claims, the state of medical and scientific
knowledge did not provide GE with knowledge, either actual or constructive, and by the
application of reasonable developed human skill and foresight GE had no reason to know the
propensities, if any, of “asbestos,” “asbestos dust,” “asbestos fibers” and/or “asbestos products”
to cause or contribute to the creation of medical conditions or circumstances involving alleged
injuries to the lungs, respiratory system, larynx, stomach or other bodily organs, bone and tissue,
and also including asbestosis, respiratory disorders, risk of mesothelioma or any other illness of
any type whatsoever at the times relevant to Plaintiff’s claims.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
51. This answering defendant did not give, make or otherwise extend warranties,
whether express or implied, upon which Plaintiff could rely.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
52. This answering defendant breached no warranties, whether express or implied.
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
53. Any cause of action against GE based on a breach of warranties is barred because
of failure to give GE timely notice required by the Uniform Commercial Code enacted in New
York.
11 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A THIRTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
54. The doctrine of strict liability in tort is inapplicable to this litigation.
AS AND FOR A FORTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
55. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to
identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any
product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s Complaint
fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would
contravene GE's constitutional rights to substantive and procedural due process of law as
guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and
the Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
56. Plaintiff’s claim for relief, if granted, would constitute a taking of private property
for public use without just compensation, and would contravene GE's rights as preserved by the
Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of
the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
57. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to
identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any
product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, said Complaint fails
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would
constitute a denial by this court of this defendant's right to equal protection of the law, as preserved
by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as well as the Constitution
of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction.
12 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A FORTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
58. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to
identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any
product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, said Complaint fails
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would
constitute an invalid burden by this court on interstate commerce, and a burden without resort to
less burdensome alternatives, in violation of the Commerce Clause, Article I,Section 8, of the
Constitution of the United States.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
59. Plaintiff’s claims are barred as a result of the unconstitutionality of the applicable
revival statute.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
60. Plaintiff’s claims are barred because of Plaintiff’s failure to join necessary and
indispensable parties.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
61. Insofar as Plaintiff’s Complaint is premised upon any claims accruing on or after
September 1, 1975, to recover damages for personal injuries, the amount of damages recoverable
thereon must be diminished by reason of the culpable conduct attributable to the Plaintiff and
defendants other than this answering defendant, including contributory negligence and assumption
of the risk, in the proportion to which the culpable conduct attributable to Plaintiff and/or others
bears to the culpable conduct which caused the damages.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
62. The damages allegedly sustained by the Plaintiff were caused, in whole or in part,
13 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
through the operation of nature.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
63. At all times relevant to this litigation, the agents, servants and/or employees of this
answering defendant utilized proper methods in the conduct of its operations, in conformity with
the available knowledge and research of the scientific and industrial communities.
AS AND FOR A FORTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
64. Plaintiff failed to mitigate or otherwise act to lessen or reduce the injuries alleged
in Plaintiff’s Complaint.
AS AND FOR A FIFTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
65. While denying the allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint with respect to liability, to
the extent that they may be able to prove negligence or improper conduct, the acts of this answering
defendant were not a proximate cause of any injuries to Plaintiff.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
66. To the extent that Plaintiff’s claims have been revived by amendments to New
York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules, said claims can be no greater than what they were at the time
when they originally accrued. Therefore, Plaintiff cannot rely on the doctrine of strict liability in
tort, and Plaintiff’s warranty claims are barred for lack of privity.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
67. Liability based on the Uniform Commercial Code, pure comparative negligence,
strict liability in tort, or other legal doctrines or statutes, before the dates such legal doctrines were
adopted in this jurisdiction, violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
United States Constitution.
14 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
68. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is in violation of the Due Process clause of
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and violates the
Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
69. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is in violation of the Eighth Amendment
prohibition of ex post facto laws and laws impairing the obligations of contracts contained in
Section 20, Paragraph 1, of Article 1 of the United States Constitution.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
70. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to allege any allegations about, concerning or directed at
this answering defendant and therefore fails to state a claim against this defendant.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
71. The claims asserted herein are barred by the doctrines of Estoppel and Waiver.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SeVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
72. GE has a defense founded upon documentary evidence.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
73. Plaintiff or any other parties asserting causes of action in this matter have not the
legal capacity to sue.
AS AND FOR A FIFTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
74. There is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause of
15 of 22
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021
action in a court of any state or the United States.
AS AND FOR A SIXTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
75. The causes of action herein, or any of them, may not be maintained because of
arbitration and award, collateral estoppel, discharge in bankruptcy, infancy or other disability of
the moving party, payment, release, res judicata, statute of limitations, or statute of frauds.
AS AND FOR A SIXTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
76. With respect to any counterclaim, it may not properly be interposed in this action.
AS AND FOR A SIXTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
77. All defenses which have been or will be asserted by other defendants and/or third-
party defendants in this action are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth at
length herein as defenses to Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint. In addition, this answering defendant
will rely upon any and all other and further defenses which become available or appear during
discovery proceedings in this action and hereby specifically reserves the right to amend its answer
for the purposes of asserting any such additional affirmative defenses.
AS AND FOR A SIXTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE,
DEFENDANT GE STATES:
78. If it is determined that the Plaintiff were exposed to any GE product, which product
or components of those products were acquired from or sold by or used on behalf of the United
States of America or any State or agency thereof, then GE is entitled to any sovereign or
government immunity or defense available
Preview
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x HARRY J. HAMPSON, Index No.: 606219/2021 GENERAL ELECTRIC Plaintiff(s), COMPANY'S VERIFIED -against- ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, CROSS-CLAIMS, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC, n/k/a RHONE POULENC AND ANSWER TO CROSS- AG COMPANY, n/ k/a BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC., et CLAIMS al., Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------x COUNSELORS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant General Electric Company (hereinafter “GE”), by its attorneys, Tanenbaum Keale LLP, hereby answers Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint (hereinafter "Complaint") as follows: 1. GE is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 of the Complaint and leaves the plaintiff to his proofs. 2. The statements contained in paragraph 2 of Plaintiff’s Complaint do not require any admissions or denials as said statements merely define "Defendants" as used within the context of Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint. 3. GE, other than admitting it is a New York Corporation, denies the remaining allegations contained in paragraphs 3 through 23 of Plaintiff’s Complaint to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other defendant in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 3 through 23 to the Court. 1 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 4. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 23 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 24 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 5. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 25 through 43 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 25 through 43 to the Court. AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 6. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 43 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 44 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 7. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 45 through 49 Plaintiff’s Complaint to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 45 through 49 to the Court. AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 8. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 49 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 50 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 2 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 9. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 51 through 59 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 51 through 59 to the Court. AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 10. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 59 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 60 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 11. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 61 through 70 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to any other party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 61 through 70 to the Court. AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 12. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 70 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 71 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 13. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 72 through 89 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to other party or third party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 72 through 89 to the Court. 3 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT ALL DEFENDANTS, GE ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS: 14. GE repeats and realleges each and every answer to each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 89 of Plaintiff’s Complaint with the same force and effect as if fully set forth at length herein answer to paragraph 90 of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 15. GE denies the allegations contained in paragraphs 91 and 92 of Plaintiff’s Complaint, including their subparts, to the extent they pertain to GE and denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations to the extent they pertain to other party or third party in this action. GE also refers all conclusions of law contained in paragraphs 91 and 92 to the Court. AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 16. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to contain any allegations whatsoever against GE, and fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against GE. AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 17. That GE acted reasonably and with due care toward Plaintiff. AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 18. That GE owed no duty to Plaintiff. AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 19. That GE violated no duty owed to Plaintiff. AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 20. That at all times relevant hereto, GE complied with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. 4 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 21. In the event that Plaintiff relies on New York Law, L. 1986 C. 682 Sections 4 and 12 as grounds for maintaining this action, these sections are unconstitutional and this action is time barred. AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 22. The claims are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 23. That GE was not served in accordance with the provisions of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules and therefore Plaintiff’s Complaint must be dismissed due to insufficient process and insufficient service of process. AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 24. Plaintiff’s Complaint contains no information regarding dates of exposure, injury or diagnosis, or any other information necessary to determine whether Plaintiff’s claims were timely filed. GE asserts the claims may be barred under the terms of any relevant statutes of limitations or repose from the jurisdiction or jurisdictions whose limitations or repose provisions govern. AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 25. Plaintiff have failed to plead any basis for claims of misrepresentation, deliberate concealment, or fraud against GE, much less state such claims with the specificity required by the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 26. That one or more of the causes of action have not been maintained in a timely fashion and Plaintiff have neglected the same and should be barred by the doctrine of laches. 5 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 27. That any injuries and/or damages sustained by the Plaintiff, as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint herein, were caused in whole or in part by the contributory negligence and/or culpable conduct of said Plaintiff and not as a result of any contributory negligence and/or culpable conduct on the part of the answering defendant, which either bars or reduces Plaintiff’s claims herein an amount to be determined by the trier of fact. AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 28. If Plaintiff sustained any injury as alleged, which is denied, the same resulted, upon information and belief, from their own negligence in failing to care for their own health by using tobacco products over an extended period of time. The use of said tobacco products is the sole, direct and proximate cause, or a contributing cause, of the alleged injury or damage, if any, about which Plaintiff complain. AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 29. If Plaintiff sustained any injuries or damages as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint, all of which GE specifically denies, then such injuries and damages were caused or contributed to by reason of the negligence of said Plaintiff, by reason of, but not limited to, said Plaintiff’s failure to wear a respirator, engage in safe work practices or to protect themselves adequately from risk of harm. AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 30. If Plaintiff sustained any injury or damage, which is denied, then such injury or damage were proximately caused or contributed to by exposure to and inhalation of noxious and deleterious fumes and residues from industrial products and by-products prevalent on Plaintiff’s 6 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 job sites and substances other than those manufactured or sold by GE, if any, and by cumulative exposure to all types of environmental and industrial pollutants of air and water. AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 31. Insofar as Plaintiff’s Complaint and each cause of action considered separately allege a cause of action accruing before September 1, 1975, each such cause of action is barred by reason of the culpable conduct attributable to Plaintiff, including contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. AS AND FOR A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 32. This action may be barred by the applicable state and/or federal industrial insurance and/or worker's compensation laws which may provide an exclusive remedy for the damages which Plaintiff allegedly sustained, if any. AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 33. In the event that Plaintiff were employed by this answering defendant, Plaintiff’s sole and exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Law of the State of New York. AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 34. That the accident and injuries complained of in the Plaintiff’s Complaint were caused or brought about by the negligence of a third person or persons over whom this answering defendant had no control and for whose acts the answering defendant was in no way responsible. AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 35. That by entering into the activity in which the Plaintiff were engaged at the time of the occurrence set forth in Plaintiff’s Complaint, said Plaintiff knew the hazards thereof and the inherent risks incident thereto and had full knowledge of the dangers thereof; that whatever injuries and damages were sustained by the Plaintiff herein as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint arose from 7 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 and were caused by the reason of such risks voluntarily undertaken by the Plaintiff in their activities and such risks were assumed and accepted by them in performing and engaging in said activities. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 36. There should be no recovery against GE because of any failure to warn or inadequacy of warning because, upon information and belief, at all times pertinent to Plaintiff’s claims, said Plaintiff were possessed of or should have been possessed of good and adequate knowledge which negated any need for said warning and/or Plaintiff were required to follow specific written safety procedures as established by their employers which negated the need or requirement for any such warning. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 37. Whatever damages Plaintiff may have suffered, if any, were solely or proximately caused by the Plaintiff when they assumed and voluntarily exposed themselves to specific and appreciated risks pursuant to the doctrine of volenti non fitinjuria and assumption of risk, for which Plaintiff are barred from receiving damages, or, in the alternative, for which recovery is reduced. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 38. That after the product(s) left the control of this answering defendant, they were subject to abuse, alteration, change, improper installation or operation by persons not in the employ or control of this defendant; which alteration, change, abuse, improper installation or operation proximately caused the injuries complained of by Plaintiff in Plaintiff’s Complaint. Such change in condition bars the action as against this defendant. 8 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 39. The alleged injuries and damages of which the Plaintiff complain were caused by unauthorized, unattended, or improper use of the products complained of, and as a result of failure to exercise reasonable and ordinary care, caution and vigilance for which GE is not liable or not responsible. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 40. That any oral warranties upon which Plaintiff allegedly relied are inadmissible and unavailable because of the provisions of the applicable Statute of Frauds. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 41. That Plaintiff, their coworkers or employers misused, abused, mistreated and misapplied the product(s) designated as asbestos material as alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint herein. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 42. Whatever damages Plaintiff may have suffered, if any, were due solely or in part to the failure of Plaintiff’s employers to take adequate precautions and provide Plaintiff with a safe place to work. AS AND FOR A TWENTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 43. While this answering defendant denies the allegations of Plaintiff with respect to negligence, statutory liability, strict liability, injury and damages, to the extent that Plaintiff may be able to prove the same, they were the result of intervening and/or interceding acts of superseding negligence on the part of third-parties over which this defendant had neither control nor right of control and are not recoverable as against this defendant. 9 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A TWENTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 44. In accordance with CPLR 1601 et seq., the liability of this answering defendant, if any, to the Plaintiff for non-economic loss is limited to this defendant’s equitable share, determined in accordance with the relative culpability of all persons or entities contributing to the total liability for non-economic loss, including named parties and others over whom Plaintiff could have obtained personal jurisdiction with due diligence. AS AND FOR A THIRTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 45. In the event Plaintiff recover a verdict or judgment against the defendant, then said verdict or judgment must be reduced pursuant to CPLR 4545(c) by those amounts which have been, or will, with reasonable certainty, replace or indemnify Plaintiff, in whole or in part, for any past or future claimed economic loss, from any collateral source such as insurance, social security, workers compensation or employee benefit programs. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 46. If Plaintiff have heretofore settled or should hereafter settle or have any judgment rendered in their favor for any of their alleged injuries and damages with any entity, then GE is entitled to a setoff in the amount of said settlement. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 47. Plaintiff contributed to their illness and/or injuries, in whole or in part, by the use of other substances, product, drugs or medications. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 48. The place of trial of this action is stated for an improper venue. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 49. In the event it should be proven at the time of trial that this answering defendant is 10 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 subject to market share liability, then this defendant’s respective share of such liability would be of such a de minimus amount as to make its contribution for damages negligible and this defendant would be entitled to contribution, either in whole or in part, from the co-defendants not represented by this answer. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 50. At all times material to Plaintiff’s claims, the state of medical and scientific knowledge did not provide GE with knowledge, either actual or constructive, and by the application of reasonable developed human skill and foresight GE had no reason to know the propensities, if any, of “asbestos,” “asbestos dust,” “asbestos fibers” and/or “asbestos products” to cause or contribute to the creation of medical conditions or circumstances involving alleged injuries to the lungs, respiratory system, larynx, stomach or other bodily organs, bone and tissue, and also including asbestosis, respiratory disorders, risk of mesothelioma or any other illness of any type whatsoever at the times relevant to Plaintiff’s claims. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 51. This answering defendant did not give, make or otherwise extend warranties, whether express or implied, upon which Plaintiff could rely. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 52. This answering defendant breached no warranties, whether express or implied. AS AND FOR A THIRTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 53. Any cause of action against GE based on a breach of warranties is barred because of failure to give GE timely notice required by the Uniform Commercial Code enacted in New York. 11 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A THIRTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 54. The doctrine of strict liability in tort is inapplicable to this litigation. AS AND FOR A FORTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 55. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would contravene GE's constitutional rights to substantive and procedural due process of law as guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 56. Plaintiff’s claim for relief, if granted, would constitute a taking of private property for public use without just compensation, and would contravene GE's rights as preserved by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A FORTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 57. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, said Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would constitute a denial by this court of this defendant's right to equal protection of the law, as preserved by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as well as the Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction. 12 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A FORTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 58. To the extent Plaintiff’s Complaint and the causes of action pled therein fail to identify GE as the manufacturer in fact of any injury-causing products, or fail to identify any product manufactured by GE as the cause in fact of any injuries to Plaintiff, said Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, inasmuch as such claims, if granted, would constitute an invalid burden by this court on interstate commerce, and a burden without resort to less burdensome alternatives, in violation of the Commerce Clause, Article I,Section 8, of the Constitution of the United States. AS AND FOR A FORTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 59. Plaintiff’s claims are barred as a result of the unconstitutionality of the applicable revival statute. AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 60. Plaintiff’s claims are barred because of Plaintiff’s failure to join necessary and indispensable parties. AS AND FOR A FORTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 61. Insofar as Plaintiff’s Complaint is premised upon any claims accruing on or after September 1, 1975, to recover damages for personal injuries, the amount of damages recoverable thereon must be diminished by reason of the culpable conduct attributable to the Plaintiff and defendants other than this answering defendant, including contributory negligence and assumption of the risk, in the proportion to which the culpable conduct attributable to Plaintiff and/or others bears to the culpable conduct which caused the damages. AS AND FOR A FORTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 62. The damages allegedly sustained by the Plaintiff were caused, in whole or in part, 13 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 through the operation of nature. AS AND FOR A FORTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 63. At all times relevant to this litigation, the agents, servants and/or employees of this answering defendant utilized proper methods in the conduct of its operations, in conformity with the available knowledge and research of the scientific and industrial communities. AS AND FOR A FORTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 64. Plaintiff failed to mitigate or otherwise act to lessen or reduce the injuries alleged in Plaintiff’s Complaint. AS AND FOR A FIFTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 65. While denying the allegations of Plaintiff’s Complaint with respect to liability, to the extent that they may be able to prove negligence or improper conduct, the acts of this answering defendant were not a proximate cause of any injuries to Plaintiff. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 66. To the extent that Plaintiff’s claims have been revived by amendments to New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules, said claims can be no greater than what they were at the time when they originally accrued. Therefore, Plaintiff cannot rely on the doctrine of strict liability in tort, and Plaintiff’s warranty claims are barred for lack of privity. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 67. Liability based on the Uniform Commercial Code, pure comparative negligence, strict liability in tort, or other legal doctrines or statutes, before the dates such legal doctrines were adopted in this jurisdiction, violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 14 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 AS AND FOR A FIFTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 68. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is in violation of the Due Process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, and violates the Constitution of the State of New York or any other applicable jurisdiction. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 69. Plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages is in violation of the Eighth Amendment prohibition of ex post facto laws and laws impairing the obligations of contracts contained in Section 20, Paragraph 1, of Article 1 of the United States Constitution. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 70. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to allege any allegations about, concerning or directed at this answering defendant and therefore fails to state a claim against this defendant. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 71. The claims asserted herein are barred by the doctrines of Estoppel and Waiver. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SeVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 72. GE has a defense founded upon documentary evidence. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 73. Plaintiff or any other parties asserting causes of action in this matter have not the legal capacity to sue. AS AND FOR A FIFTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 74. There is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause of 15 of 22 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 05/07/2021 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 606219/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/07/2021 action in a court of any state or the United States. AS AND FOR A SIXTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 75. The causes of action herein, or any of them, may not be maintained because of arbitration and award, collateral estoppel, discharge in bankruptcy, infancy or other disability of the moving party, payment, release, res judicata, statute of limitations, or statute of frauds. AS AND FOR A SIXTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 76. With respect to any counterclaim, it may not properly be interposed in this action. AS AND FOR A SIXTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 77. All defenses which have been or will be asserted by other defendants and/or third- party defendants in this action are adopted and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth at length herein as defenses to Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint. In addition, this answering defendant will rely upon any and all other and further defenses which become available or appear during discovery proceedings in this action and hereby specifically reserves the right to amend its answer for the purposes of asserting any such additional affirmative defenses. AS AND FOR A SIXTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, DEFENDANT GE STATES: 78. If it is determined that the Plaintiff were exposed to any GE product, which product or components of those products were acquired from or sold by or used on behalf of the United States of America or any State or agency thereof, then GE is entitled to any sovereign or government immunity or defense available