arrow left
arrow right
  • Costello, Cooney & Fearon, Pllc v. Melinda Burdick BoweTorts - Other (Unjust Enrichment/Convers) document preview
  • Costello, Cooney & Fearon, Pllc v. Melinda Burdick BoweTorts - Other (Unjust Enrichment/Convers) document preview
  • Costello, Cooney & Fearon, Pllc v. Melinda Burdick BoweTorts - Other (Unjust Enrichment/Convers) document preview
  • Costello, Cooney & Fearon, Pllc v. Melinda Burdick BoweTorts - Other (Unjust Enrichment/Convers) document preview
						
                                

Preview

211 W JeffersonSt.,Suite1 Syracuse, NY 13202 Tel:315.422.1152Fax: 315.422.1139 CC X )NEY & ITARON. Pl .1 t www.ccf-law.com ExperienceInnovation Paul G. Ferrara, Partner pferrara@ccf-law.com Also Admittedin Massachusetts May 10, 2022 VIA NYSCEF Hon. Deborah H. Karalunas, J.S.C. Onondaga County Courthouse 401 Montgomery Street Syracuse, New York 13202 Re: Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC v. Bowe Index No.: 003917/2021 Dear Justice Karalunas: Presently pending before this Court is a motion to compel defendant's responses to various discovery devices and Interrogatories. Please allow this letter to serve as a status update on that motion. Since service of our motion, we have received certain responses from defendant. Thereafter, we held a telephone conference with defendant's counsel and obtained supplemental responses and document production based upon our discussion. Accordingly, we are now able to withdraw the majority of our pending motion. The sole remaining item of contention is defendant's refusal to produce her tax returns. As the Court is aware, our Complaint is based upon defendant's receipt of monies to which she was not entitled, which were distributions made to the partners following her withdrawal as a member of the firm. Defendant claims those monies were 2020 distributions, and that she was therefore entitled to them. Defendant's treatment of that income in her tax returns, in either 2020 or 2021, is accordingly material and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in this matter. We have discussed this with defense counsel, and defendant stillrefuses to provide her Federal and State returns. Moreover, defendant has even claimed some undefined privilege with respect to her K-ls from her time as a member of the firm, although those K-1s were generated by our accountants, at our request. Her privilege log is attached to this letter as Exhibit R and is incorporated in our motion. Notwithstanding defendant's objections to providing her own tax returns, we have provided defendant with our firm returns for 2017-2020, subject to the stipulated confidentiality order. ALBANY OFFICE CAZENOVIA OFFICE 220 Columbia Turnpike| Rensselaer, NY12144 SMillStreet| Cazenovia, NY13035 Hon. Deborah H. Karalunas, J.S.C. May 10, 2022 Page 2 We thank the Court for its anticipated attention to these matters, and look forward to addressing the same with the Court at motion term on May 25, 2022. Very truly yours, COSTELLO,COONEY &F ,PLLC P G. Ferrara PGF/lja cc: Andrew J. Ryan, Esq. (via NYSCEF)