Preview
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
EXHIBIT “D”
FILED:
FILED : NEW
NEW YORK
YORK COUNTY
COUNTY CLERK
CLERK 11/23/2022
02/03/2015 08:56
04:07 AM INDEX
INDEX NO.
NO. 152972/2014
152972/2014
PM|
NYSCEF
NYSCEF DOC.
DOC. NO.
NO. 93
21 RECEIVED
RECEIVED NYSCEF:
NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
02/03/2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
JORDY F. RAMIREZ, an infant under the age of 14 years,
by his father and natural guardian, EUGENIO M.
Index No.: 152972/14
RAM1REZ, Individually and ROSALBA LUNA,
Individually '
VERIFIED ANSWER TO
AMENDED VERIFIED
Plaintiffs
COMPLAINT
-against-
RASHMI AMBEWADIKAR, D.D.S., and
METROPOLITAN DENTAL D.D.S. - 225
ASSOCIATES,
BROADWAY, P.C.,
Defendants.
Defendant, METROPOLITAN DENTAL ASSOCIATES, D.D.S., P.C., improperly
named in the caption as METROPOLITAN DENTAL D.D.S. - 225
ASSOCIATES,
BROADWAY, P.C., by and through its attomeys, GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, as and for its
Answer to Plaintiff's Verified Complaint (hereinafter "the Complaint"), allege as follows:
AS AND FOR THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
1. The Answering defendant denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraphs FIRST and FIFTH of the
Complaint.
2. With respect to paragraph SECOND of the Complaint, deny in the form alleged,
but admit METROPOLITAN DENTAL ASSOCIATES, D.D.S., P.C. is a domestic professional
corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of New York, dental facility located at
225 Broadway, New York, New York.
1
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
3. Deny the allegations contained in paragraphs THIRD, FOURTH, SIXTH,
SEVENTH, and EIGHTH of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
4. With respect to paragraph NINTH of the Complaint, defendant repeats, reiterates
and realleges paragraphs 1 through 3 of this Verified Answer with the same force and effect as if
they were set forth fully and at length herein.
5. Deny the allegations contained in paragraphs TENTH and ELEVENTH of the
Complaint.
AS AND FOR THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
6. With respect to paragraph TWELFTH of the Complaint, defendant repeats,
reiterates and realleges paragraphs 1 through 5 of this Verified Answer with the same force and
effect as if they were set forth fully and at length herein.
7. The answering defendant denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a
belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraphs THIRTEENTH and
FOURTEENTH of the Complaint.
8. Deny the allegations contained in paragraph FIFTEENTH of the Complaint.
AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The answering Defendants assert the protections of § 15-108 of the General Obligations
Law.
AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
In the event that the Plaintiff recovers a verdict or judgment against the answering
Defendant, then said verdict or judgment must be reduced pursuant to CPLR§ 4545 by those
2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
amounts which have been or will with reasonable certainty replace or indemnify the Plaintiff in
whole or in part for any past or future claimed medical expenses, or other such economic loss, as
paid from any collateral source, such as, but not limited to, insurance, social security, worker's
compensation or employee programs.
AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
CPLR Article 16 applies to limit of the Defendant as to the non-
any liability answering
economic loss alleged by Plaintiff.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Any award to Plaintiff for loss of earnings or impairment of earning ability should be
reduced in accordance with CPLR §4546.
AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The damages allegedly sustained by the Plaintiff were caused by the direct and proximate
negligence or intentional conduct of other parties, their agents or employees, or by others
unknown at this time over whom the answering Defendant had no control at any time relevant
hereto, and in the event the answering Defendant is found liable to Plaintiff, which liability is
expressly denied, Defendant will be entitled to indemnification, contribution or apportionment of
liability pursuant to applicable law.
AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The damage allegedly sustained by Plaintiff was not proximately caused by any
negligence or culpable conduct on the part of the answering Defendant.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiff's alleged damages were caused and brought about by an intervening and
superseding cause and was not caused by the answering Defendant or by a person or entity for
whom the answering Defendant is responsible.
AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Upon information and belief, ifthe Plaintiff sustained any injuries or damages as alleged in
the complaint, such injuries and damages were caused in whole or in part or were contributed to by
Plaintiff's own culpable conduct, contributory negligence and want of care, without any culpable
conduct, negligence or want of care on thepart of the answering Defendant, and the amount of
damages recoverable by Plaintiff, if any, should be diminished in whole or in part in proportion to
Plaintiff's culpable conduct.
AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
The answering Defendants intend to rely upon any statutory defenses available to said
Defendant pursuant to the Public Health Law, Section 2805(d).
AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
Plaintiff's verified complaint fails to state a viable cause of action.
AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
All causes of action alleged by the plaintiff are barred due to the applicable statute of
limitations.
4
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
WHEREFORE, Defendants demand judgment dismissing Plaintiff's Verified
together with the costs, attorneys fees and disbursements of the within action, and for
Complaint,
such other, further or different relief which the Court may deem just and proper under the
circumstances.
Dated: White Plains, New York
January 16, 2015
. RE I ÓILÚ S, ESQ.
GOLD SE LA LLP
Attor eys f D e idants
M ET OPOLIT DENTAL ASSOCIATES,
D.D.S., P.C.
11 Martine Avenue, Suite 750
White Plains,New York 10606
(914) 798-5400
File No.: 13501.0023
TO: STEPHEN S. LAROCCA, PLLC
11 Broadway, Suite 868
New York, New York 10004
(212) 785-8127
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
-
VERIFICATION
The undersigned, M. REGINA PHILLIPS, an attorney admitted to practice in the Courts
of the State of New York, affirms:
I am the attorney of record for the Defendant, METROPOLITAN DENTAL
ASS OCIATES, D.D.S, P.C., in the within action; I have read the foregoing VERIFIED
ANSWER and know the contents thereof; that the same is true to my own knowledge, except as
to the matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and as to those matters, I
believe them to be true.
The grounds for my belief as to all matters not stated upon my knowledge are
investigations which I have made or have caused to be made concerning the subject matter of
this action, and statements of parties and/or witnesses made herein.
This verification is made by affirmation because defendant resides in a jurisdiction
outside the county where the affirmant maintains his office.
The undersigned affirms that the foregoing statements are true under the penalties of
perjury.
Dated: White Plains, New York
January 16, 2015
M. G P •IPS
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
CERTIFICATION
M. REGINA PHILLIPS, an attorney admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of
New York, affirms under the penalties of perjury, that the foEowing statements are true:
That I am the attorney for the Defendant METROPOLITAN DENTAL ASSOCIATES,
DDS, PC in the above-captioned action.
That I to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, formed after an
certify
reasonable under the circumstances, that presentation of Defendant's Answer and the
inquiry
contentions therein are not frivolous as defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1-a, et seg.
Dated: White Plains, New York
January 16, 2015
M. RE A HI S
7
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/23/2022 08:56 AM INDEX NO. 152972/2014
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/23/2022
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
PATRICIA COCCIARDI, being duly sworn deposes and says that deponent is not a party
to this action, is over 18 years of age and resides in Valley Cottage, New York. That on the 16th
day of January, 2015, deponent served a true copy of the within VERIFIED ANSWER TO
AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT, VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL, upon:
TO: STEPHEN S. LAROCCA, PLLC
11 Broadway, Suite 868
New York, New York 10004
(212) 785-8127
PATRICI COCCIARDI
Sworn to before me this
16th day of January, 2015
SHAUN J. PILCHER
. Notary Public,State ofNew York
Notary Pub No. 01P16285652
Qualified inRockland Cou
3335984v1 CommiSSIOn Expires 07/08/
8