arrow left
arrow right
  • Onedol Rock Holdings Lp v. The Village Of Scarsdale, The Village Of Scarsdale Committee For Historic Preservation, The Village Of Scarsdale Board Of TrusteesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
  • Onedol Rock Holdings Lp v. The Village Of Scarsdale, The Village Of Scarsdale Committee For Historic Preservation, The Village Of Scarsdale Board Of TrusteesSpecial Proceedings - CPLR Article 78 document preview
						
                                

Preview

Troy D. Lipp, Esq. tlipp@cuddyfeder.com November 15, 2021 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Hon. Susan M. Cacace, Justice Supreme Court of the State of New York, Westchester County 111 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard White Plains, New York 10601 RE: ONEDOL Rock Holdings LP v. The Village of Scarsdale et. al. Index No. 54241/2021 Dear Judge Cacace, We represent the Petitioner-Plaintiff ONEDOL Rock Holdings LP (“Plaintiff”) in the above-referenced action. Plaintiff’s reply papers in this hybrid Article 78/Declaratory Judgment action are due to be filed with the Court on November 18, 2021. Given that Plaintiff’s reply papers will be addressing arguments raised by two separate defendants/respondents, the Village of Scarsdale Committee for Historic Preservation and the Village of Scarsdale Board of Trustees, we respectfully request the Court’s permission to exceed the word limitation applicable to reply papers under 22 NYCRR 202.8-b, from 4,200 words to 7,000 words. We appreciate the Court’s consideration of this request. Respectfully yours, /s/ Troy Lipp Troy D. Lipp Cc: By NYSCEF Daniel Pozin, Esq. Patricia Gurahian, Esq. C&F: 3619251.1 4901069.v1