arrow left
arrow right
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
  • Unknown Successor Trustee Vs Seidleck, Marianne C Homestead Foreclosure $50,001 - $249,999 document preview
						
                                

Preview

Filing # 93019183 E-Filed 07/23/2019 03:19:23 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, Case Number: 11-2019-CA-001728-0001- XX Vs. UNKNOWN SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE MARIANNE ELIZABETH MCNAMARA A/K/A MARIANNE E, MCNAMARA REVOCABLE TRUST DATED JUNE 16, 2018; MARIANNE C, SEIDLECK; MARIANNE C. SEILECK AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARIANNE ELIZABETH MCNAMARA A/K/A MARIANNE FE, MCNAMARA, DECEASED; KRISTI LUCZKOWSKI; E*TRADE BANK; LAKESIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.; DISCOVER BANK; UNKNOWN TENANT(S), Defendants. OS SH HS SSS DEFENDANT, LAKESIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT COMES NOW the Defendant, LAKESIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., by and through its undersigned counsel, and files its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint herein and, in support thereof, would state as follows: COUNT I MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE 1. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 1 of Plaintiffs Complaint and therefore denies same. 2. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 2 of lof4 FILED: COLLIER COUNTY, CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK, 07/23/2019 03:19:23 PMPlaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. Defendant admits that copies of a note and mortgage are attached. 3. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 3 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 4, Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 5. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 5 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 6. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 6 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 7. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 7 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 8. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 8 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 9. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 10. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 11. Defendant is without knowledge as to the allegations contained in Paragraph 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint and therefore denies same. 12. As to Paragraph 12(e), Defendant, LAKESIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., admits it may claim an interest in the subject property for assessments. Defendant is without knowledge as to the priority of the interest and therefore 20f 4denies same. WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Court enter its order determining the priorities of the parties and if Plaintiffs alleged interest is deemed superior, foreclosing the interest of the Defendant according to those priorities and, if any sums are left remaining following the sale of the property, the Court determine the priorities of the parties as to those amounts. FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE If the Plaintiffs mortgage is not a first mortgage, the interest of Defendant, LAKESIDE GARDES CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for- profit corporation, is superior to the mortgage of Plaintiff. SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE If the Plaintiff acquires title to the subject condominium unit by foreclosure, or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, the Plaintiff may be liable to the Defendant, LAKESIDE GARDENS CONDOMINIUM B CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, for up to twelve (12) months of unpaid assessments, that come due prior to the Plaintiffs acquisition of title (said liability not to exceed 1% of the original mortgage debt). WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this Court enter its order granting relief sought by Plaintiff. 3 of 4DATED this__23 day of July, 2019. SAMOUCE & GAL, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Lakeside Gardens Condominium B Condominium Association, Inc. 5405 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Za STEPHEN E. SAMOUCE Florida Bar No. 0100002 StephenSamouce@SandGLawFirm.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing ANSWER has been furnished via electronic mail this_Q.3 day of July, 2019. Zachary Ullman, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Florida Bar No, 106751 Aldridge Pite LLP 1651 South Congress Avenue Delray Beach, FL 33445 Telephone: (561) 392-6391 Facsimile: (561) 392-6965 ServiceMail@aldridgepite.com Jeffry S. Perlow, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Florida Bar No, 354759 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Telephone: (239) 514-2910 Facsimile: (239) 593-1169 jeffperlow@hotmail.com SAMOUCE & GAL, P.A. Counsel for Defendant STEPHEN E. SAMOUCE Florida Bar No. 0100002 StephenSamouce@SandGLawFirm.com 4 of 4