Order to Show Cause: Freelinc Technologies, Inc. v. Raisol Advisory Llc, Raisol Llc, Raisol Capital, Llc, Raisol Freedom Llc, Raisol Freedom Manager Llc, Chintan Panchal Esq., Rastegar Panchal, Mitesh P. Lakhani, Individually And D/B/A Raisol Advisory Or Raisol Advisory Llc, James Christopher Sanborn, Individually And D/B/A Raisol Advisory Or Raisol Advisory Llc, Kristin A. Emy, Individually And D/B/A Raisol Advisory Or Raisol Advisory Llc, Raisol Advisory

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                NYSCEB.DOC. NO. 63                                                                           RECEIVED       NYSCEF:   11/13/2017
f=   R



                                                                                 At IAS Part
                                                                                           of the
                                                                                 Supreme Court of the State
                                                                                 of New York in and for the
                                                                                 County of New York at the
                                                                                 Courthouse located at 60
                                                                                 Centre Street, New York,
                                                                                 New York 10007, on the
                                                                                      day of November __,
                                                                                 2017.

               SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
               COUNTY OF NEW YORK


                FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

                                             Plaintiff,

                             v.

                RAISOL ADVISORY LLC, RAISOL LLC,
                RAISOL CAPITAL, LLC, RAISOL FREEDOM
                LLC, RAISOL FREEDOM MANAGER LLC,
                                                                              Index No.: 154220/2017
                CHINTAN PANCHAL, ESQ., RASTEGAR
                PANCHAL, MITESH P. LAKHANI,
                individually and d/b/a/ Raisol Advisory, JAMES


                                                                          TION SEQUENCE? 002
                CHRISTOPHER SANBORN, individually and
                d/b/a Raisol Advisory, KRISTIN A. EMY,
                individually and d/b/a Raisol Advisory, and
                RAISOL ADVISORY

                                             Defendants.


                      Upon reading and filing the annexed Affirmation of Evan Bolla, sworn to on

               November 9, 2017, the exhibits annexed thereto, respectively, and the accompanying

               Memorandum of Law,     and upon    all other pleadings   and   proceedings, and   good cause

               having been shown,

                      Let Plaintiff or any party show cause before the Honorable            at IAS Part S: 3

               of the Supreme Court of the State of New York in and for the County of New York at




                                                           1 of   2
OUN                   ik                                  Dv                 D        0   54   0/2017
NYSCEB. DOC.   N 0.    63                                                                          RECEIVED        NYSCEF   11/13/2017
ee *.~




                      the courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, on ther’          day

                      of Nov      , 2017   at   i 290        or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard,

                      why Defendant Raisol Advisory LLC’s application for an order declaring that Plaintiff

                      Freelinc Technologies, Inc.’s Notice of Voluntary Discontinuance is a nullity as an

                      attempt to circumvent a ruling of this Court.

                             ORDERED, that service of a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the

                      papers on which it is granted, shall be deemed good and sufficient service if served by

                      mail and email to counsel for Plaintiff, on or before the Bi day of   Mov      2017.
                               eee              opposition papers, if any, shall be served by mail and by email

                      on or before thel? day of Me W          bea

                                                                            ENTER




                                                                            JSC.




                                                                 2 of   2