arrow left
arrow right
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
  • Spectrum Blue, Llc v. Daniel Alibayof Commercial Division document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2021 04:57 PM INDEX NO. 612557/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2021 EXHIBIT EXHIBIT A A FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2021 04:57 PM INDEX NO. 612557/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2021 SUPREMECOURT SUPREME COURTOF OFTHETHESTATE STATEOF OFNEW NEWYORK YORK COUNTYOF COUNTY OFNASSAU NASSAU XX ROXXALISON ROXX ALISONLTD., LTD., IndexNo. Index No. 611620/2019 611620/2019 Plaintiff, Plaintiff, SECOND AMENDED SECOND AMENDED -against- -against- RESPONSES AND RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONSTO OBJECTIONS TO SPECTRUM BLUE, SPECTRUM BLUE, LLC EEC and and VAL VAL KATAYEV, KATAYEV, DOCUMENT DEMANDS DOCUMENT DEMANDS Defendants. Defendants. X Defendants Defendants Spectrum Spectrum Blue, Blue, EEC LLC (“Spectrum ("Spectrum Blue”) Blue") and and Val Val Katayev Katayev (together, (together, “Defendants”), by "Defendants"), by and and through through their their attorneys, attorneys, Meyer, Meyer, Suozzi, Suozzi, English English & & Klein, Klein, P.C., P.C., hereby hereby respond and respond and object object to to the the document document demands demands of of Plaintiff Plaintiff Roxx Roxx Alison Alison Ltd. Ltd. ("Plaintiff'), (“Plaintiff’), dated dated April 2, April 2, 2020 2020 (the (the "Document “Document Demands"), Demands”), as as follows: follows: The following responses The following responses andand objections objections to to the the Document Document Demands Demands reflect reflect the the best best of of Defendants’ present Defendants' present knowledge, knowledge, information, information, andand belief. belief Defendants' Defendants’ responses responses andand objections objections are made are made without without prejudice prejudice toto Defendants' Defendants’ assertion assertion ofof additional additional responses responses andand objections objections at at aa later later date. date. The The following following responses responses and and objections objections are are also also made made without without prejudice prejudice to to Defendants’ Defendants' right to right to revise, revise, correct, clarify, correct, clarify, supplement, supplement, modify, or modify, or amend amend hishis responses responses andand objections as objections as necessary necessary oror appropriate. appropriate. Defendants do Defendants do not not admit, admit, adopt, adopt, or or otherwise otherwise acquiesce acquiesce toto any any factual factual or or legal legal contention, contention, assertion, assertion, characterization, characterization, or implication or implication that that the the Document Demands Document Demands contain, contain, consist of, consist of, or or assume. assume. Any Any and and all all responses, responses, objections, objections, or or productions productions of documents of documents are are made made without without prejudice to prejudice to Defendants' Defendants’ right right to to dispute dispute such such facts facts or or legal legal conclusions. conclusions. Defendants do Defendants do not not in in any any way way waive waive oror intend intend to to waive, waive, but but rather rather expressly expressly preserve preserve andand intend intend to to preserve, preserve, any any and and all all of of their their rights rights to to object object to to (a) (a) the the competence, competence, relevance, relevance, FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2021 04:57 PM INDEX NO. 612557/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2021 materiality, materiality, or admissibility or admissibility of of any any and all and all documents documents that may that may bebe produced in produced in response to response to the the Documents Demands Documents Demands or or the the subject subject matter matter thereof; thereof; (b) the (b) the use use in in any any subsequent subsequent proceeding proceeding of of any any and and all all documents documents that that may may be be produced produced in in response response to to the the Document Document Demands Demands or or the the subject subject matter matter thereof; thereof; and and (c) (c) any any and and all all subsequent subsequent requests requests for for further further responses responses to to the the Document Demands Document Demands or or to to any any other other demand demand forfor disclosure disclosure from from Defendants. Defendants. Documents Documents that that are are protected protected from from disclosure disclosure by by the the attorney-client attorney-client privilege, privilege, the the common interest common interest or or joint defense privilege joint defense privilege oror doctrine, doctrine, the the attorney attorney work work product product doctrine, doctrine, oror any any other other privilege, privilege, immunity, immunity, or or protection protection available available under under the the law, law, will will not not be be produced. produced. The The inadvertent disclosure inadvertent disclosure ofof any any documents documents protected protected byby the the attorney-client attorney-client privilege, privilege, the common the common interest or interest or joint joint defense defense privilege privilege or doctrine, or doctrine, the the attorney work attorney work product product doctrine, doctrine, or any or any other other privilege, privilege, immunity, immunity, or or protection protection available available under under the the law, law, is is not not intended intended to to be, be, nor nor shall shall it it constitute, aa waiver constitute, waiver ofof such such privilege, privilege, immunity, immunity, or or protection protection asas to to such such documents. documents. Defendants Defendants reserve the reserve the right right to to demand demand the the return return of of any any such such documents, documents, including, including, but not but not limited limited to, to, any any and all copies, and all copies, excerpts, excerpts, oror summaries summaries of of such such documents. documents. Document Demand Document Demand No. No. 11 In In accordance accordance with with CPLR CPLR §§ 3101(e), 3101(e), copies copies of any of any written written statements statements or or admissions admissions made by made by plaintiff plaintiff concerning concerning thethe subject subject matter matter of of this this action. action. Responses and Responses and Objections Objections to to Document Document Demand Demand No. No. 11 Defendants Defendants object object to to this this Document Document Demand Demand on on the the grounds grounds that that it it is is vague vague and and ambiguous, ambiguous, as as the the terms terms “written "written statements” statements" and and “admissions” "admissions" are are unclear unclear and and otherwise otherwise undefined. undefined. Defendants Defendants also also objects objects to to this this Document Document Demand Demand on on the the grounds grounds that that it it calls calls for for production production of documents of documents beyond beyond those those required required by by C.P.L.R. C.P.L.R. 3101(e). 3101(e). Subject Subject to, to, and and without without waiving, waiving, the the foregoing objections, foregoing objections. Defendants Defendants state that state that they they are are not in not in possession, possession, custody, custody, or or control of control of any any statement statement that that must must be be produced produced pursuant pursuant toto C.P.L.R. C.P.L.R. 3101(e). 3101(e). 2 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2021 04:57 PM INDEX NO. 612557/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2021 Document Demand Document Demand No. No. 22 All All contracts, contracts, agreements agreements between plaintiff between plaintiff and and Spectrum Blue Spectrum Blue LLC, LLC, all all amendments amendments thereto, thereto, and and all all documents documents comprising comprising or or concerning concerning communieations communications concerning concerning their their negotiation and negotiation and execution. execution. Responses and Responses and Objections Objections to to Document Document Demand Demand No. No. 22 Defendants object Defendants object to to this this Document Document Demand. Demand. Because this Because this Document Document Demands Demands calls calls for for the production the production of of "all" “all” contracts contracts and and agreements agreements between between Plaintiff Plaintiff and and Spectrum Spectrum Blue, Blue, as as well well as as “all” "all" communications communications regarding regarding their their “negotiation "negotiation and and execution,” execution," regardless regardless of, of, inter inter alia, alia, subject subject matter, matter, it it is is overly overly broad, broad, unduly unduly burdensome, burdensome, lacking lacking in in reasonable reasonable particularity, particularity, and and calling calling for for the the production production of of irrelevant irrelevant documents. documents. Moreover, Moreover, communications communications regarding regarding “negotiation "negotiation and and execution” execution" would