On October 22, 2010 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Citysightseeing Corporation,
Daux, Benjamin,
Gina Schembari Individually , And On Behalf Of All,
Hayward, David,
Nails, Phillip Thomas,
Salvatore Mineo Individually, And On Behalf Of All,
and
Citysightseeing Corporation,
City Sightseeing Corporation, A Delaware,
City Sightseeing Ltd.,
City Sightseeing Worlwide,
Does 1 To 500, Inclusive,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
OAM
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-17-2011 10:08 am
Case Number: CGC-10-504804
Filing Date: Oct-17-2011 10:05
Juke Box: 001 Image: 03354478
ORDER
EO INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL et al VS. CITY SIGHTSEEING CORPORATI
001003354478
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JONES BOTHWELL DION & THOMPSON, LLP
ELIZABETH THOMPSON (SBN 112888)
PAUL J. DION (SBN 088231)
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 610
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 951-8900
Facsimile: (415) 951-8901
Attorneys for Defendant
CitySightseeing Corporation
San Francisco ‘County Superior Court
act 17 2011
Cc) OF THE COURT
BY: Naa
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
SALVATORE MINEO, GINA SCHEMBARI,
PHILLIP THOMAS NAILS, BENJAMIN
DUAX and DAVID HAYWARD, individually
and on behaif of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, CITY SIGHTSEEING
WORLDWIDE and DOES 1 through 500,
inclusive,
Defendants.
No. CGC-10-504804
Action Filed: October 22, 2011
prordeen ORDER GRANTING
MOTION BY DEFENDANT CITY
SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED ANSWER TO
UNVERIFIED SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
Date: October 17, 2011
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Department: 302
No Trial Date Set
The Motion of Defendant CitySightseeing Corporation for leave to Second Amended
Answer to Unverified Second Amended Complaint for Damages was set for hearing on
October 17, 2011.
[PROP] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED ANSWER,
Case No, CGC-10-50480427
28
Having considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion
and there being no challenge to the Court’s tentative ruling, the Motion is GRANTED. Good
cause exists for leave to file the Second Amended Answer to Second Amended Complaint and
no prejudice inures to plaintiffs by granting the Motion.
Approved as to form:
LADVA LAW FIRM
By
Ashwin Ladva
Attorneys for Plaintiffs SALVATORE MINEO,
GINA SCHEMBARI, PHILLIP THOMAS NAILS,
BENJAMIN DUAX and DAVID HAYWARD,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: October 11, 2011
Judge, San Francisco Superior Court
HAROLD KAHN
-2-
[PROP] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND
AMENDED ANSWER
Case No. CGC-10-504804
Document Filed Date
October 17, 2011
Case Filing Date
October 22, 2010
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
OAM SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-17-2011 10:08 am Case Number: CGC-10-504804 Filing Date: Oct-17-2011 10:05 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03354478 ORDER EO INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF ALL et al VS. CITY SIGHTSEEING CORPORATI 001003354478 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JONES BOTHWELL DION & THOMPSON, LLP ELIZABETH THOMPSON (SBN 112888) PAUL J. DION (SBN 088231) 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 610 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 951-8900 Facsimile: (415) 951-8901 Attorneys for Defendant CitySightseeing Corporation San Francisco ‘County Superior Court act 17 2011 Cc) OF THE COURT BY: Naa SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION SALVATORE MINEO, GINA SCHEMBARI, PHILLIP THOMAS NAILS, BENJAMIN DUAX and DAVID HAYWARD, individually and on behaif of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CITY SIGHTSEEING WORLDWIDE and DOES 1 through 500, inclusive, Defendants. No. CGC-10-504804 Action Filed: October 22, 2011 prordeen ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY DEFENDANT CITY SIGHTSEEING CORPORATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Date: October 17, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Department: 302 No Trial Date Set The Motion of Defendant CitySightseeing Corporation for leave to Second Amended Answer to Unverified Second Amended Complaint for Damages was set for hearing on October 17, 2011. [PROP] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER, Case No, CGC-10-50480427 28 Having considered the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the Motion and there being no challenge to the Court’s tentative ruling, the Motion is GRANTED. Good cause exists for leave to file the Second Amended Answer to Second Amended Complaint and no prejudice inures to plaintiffs by granting the Motion. Approved as to form: LADVA LAW FIRM By Ashwin Ladva Attorneys for Plaintiffs SALVATORE MINEO, GINA SCHEMBARI, PHILLIP THOMAS NAILS, BENJAMIN DUAX and DAVID HAYWARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: October 11, 2011 Judge, San Francisco Superior Court HAROLD KAHN -2- [PROP] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED ANSWER Case No. CGC-10-504804