arrow left
arrow right
  • CASHCALL INC VS. JAMES ACERRA MONEY document preview
  • CASHCALL INC VS. JAMES ACERRA MONEY document preview
  • CASHCALL INC VS. JAMES ACERRA MONEY document preview
  • CASHCALL INC VS. JAMES ACERRA MONEY document preview
						
                                

Preview

|ATTORNEY OR PARTY. WITHOUTATTORNEY. STA N Nae: John P. Kenosian 80261 LAW OFFICES OF KENOSIAN & MIELE, LLP ] $: 858] Santa Monica Blvd. #17 si pict Ms Superior ‘our of California inayat Saw Brancisen JUN 08 2021 CLE Ur 1 rie COURT é SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 puty Clerk JAN FRANCISCO. SMALL. CLAIMS cn so SS L ” $,0.0070.00 : $0.00 /0.00 110424 -IN2~Short Tile: CASHCALL, INC. vs. ACERRA, et al. [xd] Mail 8, ‘of ageland not elparty to this levi action, 3 ‘Miyresidence'or business addtess i: 8581 Santa Monica Blvd. #17, Los Angeles, CA 90069 ‘Costs Alter Judgment; Acknowledgment of Credit; and. a | PEM an aren the:courty where the malf occured: (1) lenclosed'a.copy'in an‘envelope - JAMES ACERRA 1777 PINE ST APT 105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109 12-05-20 i j (Gty end'siate); Los Angeles, Cé. SOilly UEINSFER E, Gop 88 TEMES, C. MAYS NOTE SA SORES 2018, MEMORANDUM OF COSTS AFTER\JUDGMENT, Towa, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CREDIT, AND'DECLARATION ‘OF-ACCRUED INTEREST