arrow left
arrow right
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
  • Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company v. Eastern Fruit & Vegetables Inc. Commercial - Contract document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ATLANTIC CASAULTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Index No.: 510798/2018 Plaintiff, v. AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION EASTERN FRUIT & VEGETABLES INC. Defendant. DEBRA M. KREBS, ESQ., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the courts of the State of New York, and a partner in the law firm Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP, counsel for Plaintiff, Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company (“Atlantic Casualty”), hereby affirms the following under penalties of perjury: 1. As counsel for Atlantic Casualty, I am familiar with the facts and circumstances set forth in this Affirmation. 2. This Affirmation is respectfully submitted in support of Atlantic Casualty’s motion seeking an order (a) pursuant to CPLR 2001 and/or CPLR 5019 and/or any other appropriate rule of law or equity amending the Court’s order dated February 25, 2021 to correct typographical and/or clerical errors; and/or (b) awarding Plaintiff the costs associated with having to file such motion in light of Defendant’s refusal to speak with or otherwise communicate with Plaintiff regarding this administrative issue and other sanctions as the Court deems appropriate; and (c) granting such other and further relief as this Court deems just, equitable and proper. SUMMARY 3. Defendant has not responded to the substance of Atlantic Casualty’s discovery demands and interrogatories. Atlantic Casualty filed two motions seeking relief with respect to that failure. The Court issued an order dated February 25, 2021 in response to Atlantic Casualty’s 1 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 second motion. Although it is our understanding and belief that the Court intended to provide a remedy to Atlantic Casualty (Plaintiff), it appears that the order inadvertently contains typographical or clerical errors, as a result of which the ultimate relief awarded was to direct Plaintiff (i.e. Atlantic Casualty) to respond to its own demands. In light of this, Atlantic Casualty requests that the order be corrected. 4. We also request costs and other sanctions which the Court deems appropriate. As the Court will note, counsel for Defendant habitually ignores communications from the undersigned attempting to resolve matters (including matters relating to the underlying discovery as well as the issue at hand). This is what resulted in the original discovery motion, the motion seeking to enforce the November 4, 2020 order and now this motion to obtain a very simple correction of what was clearly a clerical error. Since we would not have had to incur the costs of filing yet another motion but for the conduct of Defendant’s counsel, it is respectfully requested that the Court award Atlantic Casualty the costs and legal fees associated with filing this motion and any other sanctions this Court deems appropriate. ARGUMENT 5. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the Court’s order dated February 25, 2021. 6. Attached respectively as Exhibits B, C and D are copies of the papers filed in support, opposition and reply with respect to the motion being addressed in the order attached as Exhibit A. 7. As demonstrated in the motion papers, the issue involved in the motion was that Plaintiff, Atlantic Casualty had served Defendant with discovery demands and interrogatories for which Defendant has not provided proper responses. Although we expect that the Court intended 2 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 to grant relief to Plaintiff in response to Plaintiff’s motion, there are typographical errors in the order which have the effect of issuing an order against Plaintiff: The court having considered the parties contentions, limited the demands that plaintiff was to respond to. Plaintiff did not move to reargue or object to this court’s order, and did provide some additional responses in compliance with the order. As such, preclusion will not be ordered as of yet, although plaintiff did not fully comply. Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to provide proper responses to the demands…. [Emphasis added.] Order (Exhibit A) at p. 1. We believe that each of these underlined references to “plaintiff” was intended to refer to “defendant.” Because the typographical issue affects the relief being afforded, and to avoid any potential confusion as to what the Court was directing, we believe it is necessary for the Court to correct this in order to avoid any problems in enforcing the order. 8. In light of the above, it is respectfully requested that the Court correct the within order to change each of the underlined instances of “plaintiff” to “defendant.” 9. Furthermore, as demonstrated in the Standards of Civility, adopted by the courts, lawyers are encouraged to avoid unnecessary motion practice by agreeing with other counsel whenever is practicable to do so and should promptly return telephone calls and electronic communications and answer correspondence reasonably requiring a response, as appropriate. 10. Consistent with this, 22 NYCRR 202.20-f was amended to provide that if a party unreasonably fails and/or refuses to participate in a conference requested by another party to address an issue regarding a disclosure dispute, the failure to participate in such a call may be addressed by the imposition of sanctions pursuant to Part 130. 11. We have had continuous difficulties in speaking with counsel for Defendant who continues in his refusal to respond to emails and telephone calls from the undersigned. See, Affirmation of Good Faith [NYSCEF Doc. No. 14]; Affirmation of Good Faith [NYSCEF Doc. No. 163]. 3 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 12. As demonstrated in the emails attached as Exhibit E,1 Defendant’s continued failure to respond to our communications has caused us to file this motion, which is now the third motion arising out of the same discovery dispute. As this motion should not have been necessary, it is respectfully submitted that the Court should award Atlantic Casualty the costs associated with the present motion and any other sanctions pursuant to Rule 130 and/or 22 NYCRR 202.20-f or any other rule the Court deems appropriate. WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this Court grant the within motion, together with such other and further relief as this Court deems just, equitable and proper. Dated: White Plains, New York March 11, 2021 Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP By: ________________________________ Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Atlantic Casualty Insurance Co. 925 Westchester Avenue, Suite 400 White Plains, New York 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 Fax: (914) 948-7010 TO: L. Blake Morris, Esq. L. Blake Morris & Associates Attorneys for Defendant Eastern Fruit & Vegetables, Inc. 1214 Cortelyou Road Brooklyn, New York 11218 Tel: (718) 826-8401 1 We note for the Court’s convenience that the last page of Exhibit E is the proposed Amended Order in typed format. 4 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 WORD COUNT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.8-b that the total number of words in the foregoing Affirmation in Support of Motion, inclusive of point headings and footnotes and exclusive of caption, signature blocks, and pages containing the table of contents, table of citations and this Statement is 969, which is in compliance with NYCRR 202.8-b. Dated: White Plains, New York March 11, 2021 KEIDEL, WELDON & CUNNINGHAM, LLP By: Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Atlantic Casualty Insurance Company 925 Westchester Avenue, Suite 400 White Plains, New York 10604 (914) 948-7000 5 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 Exhibit A FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 185 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2021 06/29/2021 1 of 2 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 185 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2021 06/29/2021 2 of 2 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 Exhibit E FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 From: Debra Krebs To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: RE: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 12:06:00 PM Blake, I called your office about two hours ago to make one more attempt to speak with you to see if we can stipulate to correct the order without the need for motion practice. I left a detailed message with Mo Hassan asking that you please call me. If I do not hear back from you by 3pm, I will be filing a motion as per below. Thank you. Debbie Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. From: Debra Krebs Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 7:23 AM To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: RE: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Blake, I just wanted to follow up with you regarding the email below. If I do not hear back from you by noon tomorrow, I will be filing a motion as per my email below. Please let me know ASAP whether you will stipulate to correct the order. Thank you. Debbie FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. From: Debra Krebs Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:55 PM To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Blake, I tried calling you today. Your office phone was not answering and I ultimately received a message saying that your messages are full on both of the telephone numbers listed on your website. As a result, I left a voicemail message for you on your cell phone number, but have not heard back. You may have noticed that the Court’s order that was filed today has several references to plaintiff which were clearly intended to refer to defendant. I spoke with the Court to find out how to get this amended since it is clearly just ministerial. I was told that the preferred method is for the parties to stipulate to amend the order. As a result, I have prepared a stipulation with a proposed amended order. See attached. Please return the stipulation to me signed by Wednesday, March 10, 2021. If we do not receive the signed stipulation by that date, we will file a motion seeking to correct the order and will ask that the Court award the costs associated with filing the motion. Although we made the stipulation as neutral as possible and made it very clear that we are only correcting the typographical issue, if you believe you require an amendment to the stipulation in order to sign it, please call me to discuss it so we may determine whether the parties can reach agreement regarding any proposed changes. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Debbie Krebs Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 From: Debra Krebs To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: RE: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 7:23:00 AM Blake, I just wanted to follow up with you regarding the email below. If I do not hear back from you by noon tomorrow, I will be filing a motion as per my email below. Please let me know ASAP whether you will stipulate to correct the order. Thank you. Debbie Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. From: Debra Krebs Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:55 PM To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Blake, I tried calling you today. Your office phone was not answering and I ultimately received a message saying that your messages are full on both of the telephone numbers listed on your website. As a result, I left a voicemail message for you on your cell phone number, but have not heard back. You may have noticed that the Court’s order that was filed today has several references to plaintiff which were clearly intended to refer to defendant. I spoke with the Court to find out how to get this amended since it is clearly just ministerial. I was told that the preferred method is for the parties to stipulate to amend the order. As a result, I have prepared a stipulation with a proposed amended order. See attached. Please return the stipulation to me signed by Wednesday, March 10, 2021. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 If we do not receive the signed stipulation by that date, we will file a motion seeking to correct the order and will ask that the Court award the costs associated with filing the motion. Although we made the stipulation as neutral as possible and made it very clear that we are only correcting the typographical issue, if you believe you require an amendment to the stipulation in order to sign it, please call me to discuss it so we may determine whether the parties can reach agreement regarding any proposed changes. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Debbie Krebs Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 From: Debra Krebs To: Blake@lblakemorris.com; info@lblakemorris.com Subject: Atlantic Casualty v. Eastern Fruit Date: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:55:00 PM Attachments: Stipulation to Amend Order.pdf Blake, I tried calling you today. Your office phone was not answering and I ultimately received a message saying that your messages are full on both of the telephone numbers listed on your website. As a result, I left a voicemail message for you on your cell phone number, but have not heard back. You may have noticed that the Court’s order that was filed today has several references to plaintiff which were clearly intended to refer to defendant. I spoke with the Court to find out how to get this amended since it is clearly just ministerial. I was told that the preferred method is for the parties to stipulate to amend the order. As a result, I have prepared a stipulation with a proposed amended order. See attached. Please return the stipulation to me signed by Wednesday, March 10, 2021. If we do not receive the signed stipulation by that date, we will file a motion seeking to correct the order and will ask that the Court award the costs associated with filing the motion. Although we made the stipulation as neutral as possible and made it very clear that we are only correcting the typographical issue, if you believe you require an amendment to the stipulation in order to sign it, please call me to discuss it so we may determine whether the parties can reach agreement regarding any proposed changes. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Debbie Krebs Debra M. Krebs, Esq. Keidel, Weldon & Cunningham, LLP 925 Westchester Avenue Suite 400 White Plains, NY 10604 Tel: (914) 948-7000 (201) 490-7706 Fax: (914) 948-7010 dkrebs@kwcllp.com Confidentiality: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and is privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, distribution, or copy of this communication other than to the individual or entity named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ATLANTIC CASAULTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Index No.: 510798/2018 Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION TO AMEND ORDER EASTERN FRUIT & VEGETABLES INC. Defendant. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED that in order to resolve typographical errors1 contained in the Court’s order dated February 25, 2021 [NYSCEF Doc. No. 185], the parties jointly request that the Court execute the enclosed Amended Order in the place and stead of NYSCEF Doc. No. 185. Both parties reserve all rights with respect to the amended order which they would have as respects the order filed at NYSCEF Doc. No. 185. This stipulation may be signed in counterparts. Copies of this stipulation and electronically transmitted signatures on this stipulation shall be treated as originals. KEIDEL, WELDON & CUNNINGHAM, LLP L. BLAKE MORRIS, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant By: Debra M. Krebs, Esq. By: L. Blake Morris, Esq. 925 Westchester Avenue, Suite 400 1214 Cortelyou Rd. White Plains, New York 10604 Brooklyn, New York 11218-5404 (914) 948-7000 (718) 826-8401 1 This stipulation is not a concession by either party to the accuracy of the statements made in the order and is not an acceptance by either party of the order, but is merely intended to correct instances where the court refers to “plaintiff” when it is clear that the court intended to refer to “defendant.” 1 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/29/2021 03:52 PM INDEX NO. 510798/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 281 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/29/2021 At a Centralized Compliance Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the county of Kings at the Courthouse located at Civic Center, Bourgh of Brooklyn, City and State of New York, on the day of March 2021 PRESENT: HON. LAWRENCE KNIPEL, J.S.C. ATLANTIC CASAULTY INSURANCE Cal. No. 4 COMPANY, Index No.: 510798/2018 Plaintiff, v. AMENDED ORDER EASTERN FRUIT & VEGETABLES INC. Defendant. Plaintiff’s motion to strike is decided as follows: This court’s order of 11/4/20 directed defendant to provide responses to plaintiff’s D&I, notice to admit and interrogatories, upon having reviewed the demands and defendant’s motion for a protective order. The court having considered the parties’ contentions, limited the demands that defendant was required to respond to. Defendant did not move to reargue or object to this court’s order, and did provide some additional responses in compliance with the order. As such, preclusion will not be ordered as of yet, although defendant did not fully comply. Accordingly, defendant is directed to provide proper responses to the demands, responding to the information sought, not just by referring to prior NYSCEF filings, rather, for example, if the demand seeks names of persons with knowledge and identifying the area of knowledge, provide the names and briefly identify the person’s basis of knowledge. Plaintiff need not be obligated to wade through dozens of previously e-filed documents to see if any responsive information may have been provided somewhere therein. Moreover, defendant’s claim that the tax returns are privileged is denied. Defendant is to provide proper authorizations to the IRS for the tax returns for the relevant years and proper responses as per order of 11/4/20 by 3/31/21 or shall be precluded from testifying at trial or submitting affidavit in any dispositive motion without necessity for further motion by plaintiff. ENTERED/SO ORDERED For Clerk’s Use Only MG _______ Retracked MD _______ Standard Motion Seq. # 8 Complex Hon. Lawrence Knipel, J.S.C. 1