arrow left
arrow right
  • DIANE BECK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DIANE BECK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DIANE BECK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • DIANE BECK VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                Hake Law,

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

oO DN MH RB WwW BD we

PNY ww RNR WD y —
eas oo FSS 8 RBS STR TESS Se

William M. Hake, Esq. (State Bar No. 110956)

Melissa E. Macfarlane, Esq. (State Bar No. 23981 1) ELECTRONICALLY
Rachael A. Buckman, Esq. (State Bar No. 263224) ED
HAKE LAW, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION spot tb ED
655 Montgomery $ Mati Suite 1000 County of San Francisco.
Tel: (415) 926-5800 OCT 24 2012
Fax: (415) 926-5801 Clerk of the Court
BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK
Attorneys for Defendant Deputy Cle
ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
DIANE BECK, Case No.: CGC-09-275080
Plaintiff, PROOF OF SERVICE
vs.
Complaint: February 19, 2009
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) AS Trial Date: February 11, 2013
REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS, et al,
Defendant
WwW
Ut
Mi
Wa
Ui
uit
MW
“
at
ut
W
it
it

PROOF OF SERVICEHake Law,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

oO DH HH Bw Bw

10
2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2
23
24
25
26
2
28

I, Meagan Gordon, declare as follows: | am employed in the County of San Francisco,
State of California. My business address is Hake Law, A Professional Corporation, 655
Montgomery St., Ste. 1000, San Francisco, California, 94111. ] am over eighteen years old and
not a party to this action.

On the date set forth below, I served the following document(s) described as:

Bi

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed October 24, 2012, at San Francisco, California.

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In the ordinary course of business, the foregoing
documents were served to all parties and counsel registered with LexisNexis File & Serve, as
designated on the Transaction Receipt available on the LexisNexis website.

PROOF OF SERVICE

DEFENDANT ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC’S NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR
ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
DEFENDANT ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC’S
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF
ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; OR ALTERNATIVELY,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

DECLARATION OF RACHAEL A. BUCKMAN IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT ANDERSON, ROWE & BUCKLEY, INC’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY
ADJUDCIATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ANDERSON, ROWE &

UCKLEY, INC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR

ALTERNATIVELY, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

fale Gordon om

PROOF OF SERVICE