Notice of Appeal: EDWARD SANTA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P) AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                BRAYTONSPURCELL LLP

ATTORNEYS ATLAW

222 RUSH LANDING ROAD

PO BOX 6169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169

(415) 898-1585

SD HO SD WH FN

YN RP RRM NN NR QR
Coa A MW & WN we S Oo wo WD DA ww fF WwW hw me &

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., §.B. #73685
LLOYD F. LEROY, ESQ., 8.B. #203502

RICHARD M. GRANT, ESQ., S.B. #55677 ELECTRONICALLY

BRAYTON® PURCELL L
Sutomeys z Law Road cwek, IL ED.
PO Boe é +69 ing Koa County of San Francisco

Novato, California 94948-6169 JAN 13 2011
ys) 898-1555 Clerk of the Court
‘entative Ruling Contest Email: contestasbestosTR@bravtonlaw.com BY: DIANE HAKEWILL

Deputy Clerk
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
EDWARD SANTA, ASBESTOS
No. CGC-09-275314
Plaintiff,

} DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON
vs. ) APPEAL; NOTICE OF ELECTION TO

) PROCEED UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP) ) OF COURT, RULE 8.124

(C.CP. § 904.1]

TO DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC., ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND
THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:

Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 904. 1(a)\(1), Plaintiff-Appellant
EDWARD SANTA, appeals to the California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, from
the Judgment on the Pleadings entered into on January 3, 2011 in favor of Defendant
HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on January 11,
2011.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Piaintiff-Appellant elect to proceed under California
Rules of Court, Rule 8.124 and file appendices or a joint appendix in lieu of a Clerk’s

Transcript.

itOo Oe NM AR BF BH Ne

MN YP NOY NR NM BR De mt ts
Ooms A wh B&B W HM SB DW eo NS A WA mB WB Ne oO

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that Plaintiff-Appellant, pursuant to California Rules of
Court, Rule 8.1 30, hereby designate the following proceeding for inclusion in the reporter’s
transcript on appeal:

September 21, 2010, transcript of hearing of defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES,
INC.’S Motion for Summary Judgment, San Francisco Superior Court, Department 220,
Honorable Harold E. Kahn presiding, reported by certified court reporter Lavena Ward, 7077.
Dated: January 13, 2011 BRAYTON #PURCELL LLP

BY: /s/ Lloyd F. LeRoy

Lloyd F. LeRoy (SB# 203502
Atiomeys for Plaintiffs-Appelants
EDWARD SANTAOo OBO NM DA HH & WwW HN

NN NN NY NR NY RR Rm ee a as
Sa Ahm BF Uw NM SF OD ow NY DH A B&H HY = DS

PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

Tam employed.in the County of Marin, State of California. I am over the age of 18
years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road,
P.O. Box 6169, Novato, California 94948-6169.

On January 13, 2011, { served the following document(s) described as:

DESIGNATION OF RECORD ON APPEAL: NOTICE OF ELECTION TO PROCEED
UNDER CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.124

on the interested party(ies) in this action as follows:

HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.

Steve Sobel, Esq.

GORDON & REES LLP

101 West Broadway, Ste. 2000

San Diego, CA’92101 .
(619) 696-6700

(619) 696-7124 Fax

XX. BY OFFICE MAJLING

[am readily familiar with this office's practice of collection and processing
correspondence, pleadings and other matters for mailing with the United States Postal
Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Novato, California in the
ordinary course of business. | placed in the outgoing office mail, the above-described
document(s), in a sealed envelope, addressed to the party(ies) as stated above, for
collection and processing for mailing the same day in accordance with ordinary office
practices.

Executed January 13, 2011, at Novato, California.

_i declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.

Edward Santa v. Asbestos Defs.
San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-09-275314

K:Sinjuredss 10494 palin Designation wot
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL.