arrow left
arrow right
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

GABRIEL A. JACKSON, State Bar No. 98119 CATHERINE E. GOLDEN, State Bar No. 127694 JACKSON & WALLACE LLP 55 Francisco Sireet, 6th Floor ELECTRONICALLY San Francisco, CA 94133 FILED Tel: 415.982.6300 Superior Court of California, Fax: 415.982.6700 County of San Francisco AUG 01 2008 Attorneys for Defendant GORDON PARK-LI, Clerk CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY sued erroneously BY: VANESSA WU herein as CUMMINS INC. Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO RUFUS ALEXANDER, Case No. 274719 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY’S OBJECTION TO v. STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONER ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), et al. Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY does not stipulate and hereby objects to any Discovery Commissioner hearing any discovery matter in this action pursuapt an Francisco Superior Court Rules. Dated: Jat 2008 JACKSON & WALLACE LLP REE GOLDEN ‘Kitomeys for Defendant CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY 1569739 -I- CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY'S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONERoI DN mW 28 JACKSON & WALLACE ue SAN FRANCISCO Rufus Alexander, v. Asbestos Defendants (BP) S.F.S.C #274719 PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION 1, the undersigned, declare that am a citizen of the United States and employed in San Francisco County, California. | am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within- entitled action. My business address is 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, California 94133, On August | , 2008, | electronically served pursuant to General Order No. 158, the following document(s): DEFENDANT CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY’S OBJECTION TO STIPULATION OF HEARING BY COMMISSIONER, on interested parties in this action by causing Lexis Nexis E-Service program pursuant to General Order No. 158, to transmit a true copy thereof to the email address(es) of the following party(ies): Brayton ¢ Purcell LLP and 222 Rush Landing Road wun : : . spe Novato, CA 94948-6169 ‘Please See Lexis Nexis Service List The above document(s) were transmitted by Lexis Nexis E-Service and the transmission was reported as complete without error. I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and was executed on August _t 2008, at San Francisco, California. 1569739