On July 01, 2008 a Trial was filed involving a dispute between Alexander, Rufus, and Actuant Corporation, All Asbestos Defendants, American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Erroneously Sued Herein As The, Asbestos Defendants, Bmw North America, Llc, Bmw Of North America, Llc, Bmw Of North America,Llc From The Third Cause Of, Borg-Warner Corp. By Its Sii Borgwarner Morse Tec, Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, Llc,, Carlisle Corporation, Caterpillar Inc., Clark Equipment Company, Cummins Engine Company, Dana Companies, Llc (Erroneously Sued As Dana, Deere & Company, Designated Defense Counsel, Does 1-8500, Fiat Usa, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Gatke Corporation, A Bankrupt, Defunct, Dissolved, General Motors Corporation, Hennessy Industries, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp., Mack Trucks, Inc., Maremont Corporation, Nacco Materials Handling Group, Inc., Navistar, Inc., Formerly Known As International, Nissan Forklift Corporation, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Nissan North America, Inc., North America And Nissan Technical Center North, Plant Insulation Company, Pneumo Abex Llc Successor In Interest To Abex, The Budd Co., Toyota Motors Sales, U.S.A., Inc., for ASBESTOS in the District Court of San Francisco County.
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Preview
BRYDON HuGo & PARKER ‘135 MAIN STRERT 20" FLOOR San Francisco, CA $4105 Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839] John A. Holman [Bar No. 176947] BRYDON HUGO & PARKER 135 Main Street, 20th Floor ELECTRONICALLY San Francisco, CA 94105 FILED ‘Telephone: (415) 808-0300 Superior Court of California, Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 County of San Francisco Attorneys for Defendant coRee 82008 on TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A, INC. BY: CHRISTLE ARRIOLA Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION RUFUS ALEXANDER, ASBESTOS Case No, CGC-08-274719 Plaintiffs, vs, OBJECTION TO COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AT ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B¢P), etal, | TRIAL Defendanis. TO PLAINTIFF AND HIS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: Pursuant to Local Rule 6,1(c), defendant, TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A, INC., hereby objects to a Court Commissioner acting as Judge Pro Tempore of the Trial Courts at the trial of the instant action. Dated: Augusta, 2008 BRYDON HUGO & PARKER By: C_ Ub pave R. Hugo Johrt A. Holman Attorneys for Defendant TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A, INC. 1 OBJECTION TO COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AT TRIALe oe mH DH BF YN Alexander, Rufus San Francisco County Superior Court Case No, CGC-08-274719 LexisNexis Transaction No, 20959694 PROOF OF SERVICE lam a resident of the State of California, over the age of 18 years, and nota party to the within action. My electronic notification address is service@bhplaw.com and my business address is 135 Main Street, 20% Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. On the date below, I served the following: DEFENDANT TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A., INC.'S OBJECTION TO COURT COMMISSIONER ACTING AS JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AT TRIAL on the following: BRAYTON PURCELL LLP (Novato) SEE LEXIS NEXIS SERVICE LIST 222 Rush Landing Road Novato, CA 9494! Fax: (415) 898-1247 X By transmitting electronically the document(s) listed above as set forth on the electronic service list on this date before 5:00 p.m. o By transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the fax number(s) set forth above on this date before 5:00 p.m. o By placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and mailing on the date below following the firm’s ordinary business practices, I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. Postal service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at San Francisco, California in the ordinary course of business. 1 am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. o By causing personal delivery of the document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth above. I declare under penalty of Perjury that the abo Executed on August 6, 2008, at San Francisco, Califefnia 1 PROOF OF SERVICE