arrow left
arrow right
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                Gordon & Rees LLP
101 West Broadway, Suite 2000

San Diego, CA 92101

ROGER M. MANSUKHANI (SBN: 164463)
STEVEN SOBEL (SBN: 177210)

MATTHEW A. MASON (SBN: 228056) ELECTRONICALLY

GORDON & REES LLP FILED
101 Ww. Broadway, Suite 2000 Superior Court of California,
San Diego, CA 92101 County of San Francisco
Telephone: (619) 696-6700
Facsimile: (619) 696-7124 OCT 22 2010
BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK
Deputy Clerk

Attomeys for Defendant HENNESSY
INDUSTRIES, INC.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, ) CASE NO. CGC-08-274719
)
Plaintiffs, ) Complaint filed: 07/01/08
)
v8. } PROOF OF SERVICE OF
)} DOCUMENT(S) ON PLAINTIFF
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B“*P) as Reflected ) RUFUS ALEXANDER
on Exhibits B, C, G, H, I, and DOES 1-8500; and )
SEE ATTACHED LIST. } Date: November 18, 2010
) Time: 9:30 a.m.
) Judge: Hon. Harold E. Kahn
) Trial date: Not set

I, the undersigned, say: I am over 18 years of age, employed in the County of San Diego,
California, in which the within-mentioned service occurred; and that [ am not a party to the
subject cause. My business address is 101 West Broadway, Suite 2000, San Diego, California
92101.

On October 22, 2010, I served the following document(s):

DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.’S CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT

by placing a copy thereof in a separate envelope for each addressee named hereafter and
addressed as follows:

Mr. Rufus Alexander

170 Cashmere Street, Apt. D
San Francisco, CA 94124
Plaintiff In Pro Per

0 BY MAIL. I am familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and that the
-l-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF DOCUMENT(S) ON PLAINTIFF RUFUS ALEXANDER2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

i

S 12
335 3
g5f 1s
823 16
247
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2RCWOS2TIOTHEI3V.1

0
0
(X)

(x)

correspondence shall be deposited with the United States Postal Service this same day in
the ordinary course of business pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §1013a.

BY FAX. A copy of said document(s) were delivered by facsimile transmission to the
addressee pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §1013(e).

BY PERSONAL SERVICE. | hand-delivered said document(s) to the addressee
pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §1011.

BY FEDERAL EXPRESS. | deposited said document(s) in a box or other facility
regularly maintained by the express service carrier providing overnight delivery pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure §1013(c). PLAINTIFF ONLY

All other parties have been served as follows:

BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE VIA LEXIS NEXIS FILE & SERVE. By
sending electronically a trae and correct copy thereof to Lexis Nexis File & Serve
(www. lexisnexis.conyfileandserve) for service on all counsel of record by electronic
service pursuant to the Order Mandating Electronic Filing and Service of Asbestos
Pleadings and pursuant to CCP § 1010.6 and CRC 2060(c). The transmission was
reported as complete and without error.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 22, 2010.

Jenn Howe

2-

PROOF OF SERVICE OF DOCUMENT(S) ON PLAINTIFF RUFUS ALEXANDER