Request,Application: RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                = OS O © RA

GorpoN & Rees, LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
EMBARCADERO CENTER WEST
275 BATTERY STREET, TWENTIETH FLOOR,
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117

Cc Pr NO A HH Rm

NR PRP RP RP Be NR he Ye
Ss A A BF Oo BW = S

28

TKBDNOSTI HORSE ISGéy }

S$. MITCHELL KAPLAN (SBN: 95065)
CHRISTOPHER D. STRUNK (SBN 214110)

BETHANY A. STAHLEY (SBN: 209421) ELECTRONICALLY
GORDON & REES LLP FILED
Embarcadero Center West Superior Court of California,
275 pattery Street, Suite. 2000 County of San Francisco
San Francisco, CA. 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900 OcT 26 2010
Facsimile: (415).986-8054 BY: EDNALEEN JAVIER
Deputy Clerk
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BUDD COMPANY
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS.ALEXANDER, } CASE NO. CGC-08-274719
Plaintiffs, ) REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN
) SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE
Ve ) BUDD COMPANY’S MOTION FOR
) SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B“P} )
) [CODE-CIV. PROC. § 128.7]
Defendants. )
) Date: November 18, 2010
) Time: 9:30 a.m.
) Dept.: 220
) Judge: Hon. Hon. Harold E. Kahn
) Trial Date: None set
)
)
)
__)

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to California Evidence Code sections 451,452 and 453 and Cal. Rule of Court
3.1116, Defendant LESLIE CONTROLS, INC. respectfully requests that this Court take judicial
notice of the following:

1. Plaintiff filed his Complaint against The Budd Company on July 1, 2008. In his
Complaint, plaintiff claims to have been exposed to asbestos for which BUDD is responsible.

The cover sheet of this document is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

I

DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER D. STRUNK%
3

Be

%  8GE
Bees
oles
geese
HeEeS
eeors
Bg One
Geo
45255
Shes
8° SES
“s

g

SO OD me

=
> Ss

Oo @ SDR wA ££ WwW

we Mm Be NR hw he nN
Zu RF RE RRS

2, On October 30, 2009, the Brayton®-Purcell firm’s motion to be relieved_as
counsel for plaintiffs was granted. The Order granting this Motion is attached hereto as Exhibit
2.

3. At the case management conference on August 4, 2010, plaintiff admitted that he
did.not have an asbestos.related disease in open court. At that time, and in-an effort to give
plaintiff an opportunity to retain counsel, the Court.continued plaintiff's deposition to October
18, 2010 and set a further CMC.on November 18, 2010, and advised all counsel to notice any
and all motions against plaintiff at that time. A true and correct copy.of the Case: Management
Order is attached as. Exhibit 3. Defendant further requests that the Court take judicial notice of
the transcript and minutes of the proceedings of this matter on August 4, 2010.

Pursuant to Rule 3.1116, the clerk is requested to bring the.Court’s file to the hearing.
DATED: October 1, 2010 captor LLP

By:

CHRISTOPHER D, STRUNK
Attorneys for Defendant
THE BUDD COMPANY

2
DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER D, STRUNK.EXHIBIT 1SU. NM NS * FOR COURT USE ONLY,
(cr TAHONGOBICIAL) Coon
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
(AVISO AL DEMANDADO):
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B49)
As Reflected on Exhibits 8, C, G, H, f; and DOES 1-8500;
and SEE ATTACHED List.

YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF:
{0 ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE}:

RUFUS ALEXANDER

You have 36 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you ta file a written response af this court and havea
copy served on the piaintilt, A letter or phone call vill not protect you, Your written response must be In proper tegal form ff you want fhe
court te hear your case. Thers may be 2 court form that you can use for your response, You can find these court forms and more
information af the California Courts Online Self-Help Center {wwew.courtinic.ca.goviselfhelp}, your county law library, or the courthouse:
nearest you. If you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk fora fee waiver form. If you do ret file your response on time, yourmay:
fose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property may be taken without further warning trom the court.

‘There are other logat requirements, You may want to call an attorney right away. if you do mat know an attoney, you may want to call an
attomay referral service, If you cannot afford an attomey, you may be eligibie for free legal services from a nonprofit legal services:
program, You can locale these nonprofit groups et the Caltlornta Legal Services Web site {www lawhelpeaiifornia.org), the California
Courts Oniine Self-Help Center {www.courtintc.ca.gowselinelp}, of by contacting your local.court or county bar. sssociation.

Flene 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO despads de que fe entreguen esta citacion ¥ papeles legales pars presentar una respuesta por escrito.
enesta carte y hacer que se entrague una copla al demandente, Una carte o una Yamada telefinica ag lo protegen. Su respussta por
escrito lene que aster en formate legal correcta sf desea que proresen su caso en ja corte, Es posible que hays un formulario que usted
pueda user para su respuesta, Puede encontrar estos formutarios de ta corte y més informaciin an ef Cente ce Ayuda de tas Cortes ete
California (erww.courtinfo.ca. goviseithelplespanel), on Jz biblioteca de tayas de su condado cen ia corte quete quede més cores. Sino
puedo nagar ia cvota do presentacién, pida af secretaria do fa corte que te o¢ un formularla de exencidn de page de cuotes. Stne presents
Su respuesta a vlempo, puede perder e? caso por Incumpiimlente y la corte fe podrd quitar su sueldo, diners y Blenes sin mis advertencia..

Hay otros requisites legates. Es recomendable que tame 2. un sbogado Inmadiatamente. Si no conoce a va abogado, puede lismar aun
service dq remision a abogades. SI no puede pagar.a un abogado, es posible que cumple con los requisites para obtener servicios
Jegales gratuites de un programa de servicios logales sin fines daluere, Pueds enconvar estos grupos sin fines de tvers on el sitio web de
California Legal Services, (wwe. lawhelpcalifornia.org}, en of Centre de Ayuda de las Cortes de California,

(www. courtinfa.ce.gov/seifelpfespanot) 0 ponléndose en contacto con te corte 9 ef colegia de abogados locales,
The name and address of the court ist
{El nombm y direccién de fe corte es). .
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
400. McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94402

‘The name, address, and telephone number of plaintiff's attomey, or plaintiff without an atiomey, Is:
{El nombre, fa direccién de teléfono del abogado del demandants, 0 del demandante que no ten abogado, es)
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESO., STATE BAR NO. 154436
BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP

222 Rush Lending Road, Novato, CA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555,
wot ft
pare: JUL ~ 12008 Gordon Park-L i Sect s Ms ‘set

(For ‘Service of ihis Summons, use rool of Service of Summons form 79),
(Para prueba de entrega de asta citation use el formulario Proof of Service of Summons, (POS-010)).
NOTICE TO PERSON SERVED: You are served

4. Clas an indniduat defendant,
2 0 as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify):
3..] on pehait of (specify): :
under] CoP 418,10 (corporation) (2) cep 418.co(minor)
1 cep 416.20 «defunct corporation) (cep 416.70 (conservatee)
(Cl cop 416.40 tessociation of partnership) [7] cop 416.90 (authorized person)

0 other (specify):
4 oO ‘by personal dellvery on (date):

‘wont ennel aces SUMMONS
SUE 100 {fey femuary 1, 2004)

wuiearsuy

Sebi 08 -274719er

PNEUMO ABEX LLC
BUCYRUS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

GARLOCK SEALING TRCRNOLOGIRS, LLC
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION

PLANT INSULATION COMPANY

WESTERN MacARTHUR COMPANY
MacARTHUR COMPANY

WESTERN ASBESTOS COMPANY
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.

THE BUDD COMPANY

CHRYSLER LLC

DANA CORPORATION

FORD MOTOR COMPANY.

LHAR SIEGLER DIVERSIFIED HOLDINGS CORP.
MAREMONT CORPORATION

GATKE CORPORATION

BORG-WARNER CORPORATION BY ITS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST, BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC.
BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE NORTH AMERICAN TIRE, LLC
NAVISTAR, INC.

CARLISLE CORPORATION

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES US.A., INC.

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC,

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO, INC,
CATERPILLAR, INC.

SCANDURA, INC,

MACK TRUCKS, INC,

CLARK CLUTCHES

NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.
FIAT USA INC.

DEERE & COMPANY

‘CUMMINS INC,

‘THE BOEING COMPANY

WHTTNEY DIESEL

ACTUANT CORPORATION

HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC,

AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS, INC.
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.

and DOES 1.8500,

2 OF SOA ww & Bw

Ss

ni

BRAYTON@PERCELL LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD
P.O. Box 6100
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA S4986.6169

GIS) 898-1553
ae
te

Defendants,

Rufus Alexander ve. Asbestos Defendants (BSP)
‘Sati Francisco Superior CourtATTORNEY CR PARTY SITHOUT A’ (Nome, state

“TTORNEY:
DAVID R. DONADIO, ESt ., STATE BAR NO, 154436
BRAY FONPPURCELL

Noveto,
FELEPHONERO: (415) 898-1555 FARPO: (495) 898-1247
ATTORNEY pun QlAMED Pluintifits)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BAN FRANCIS .
STREETADORESS: 400 McAllister Street JUL. = 2006

MAILING ADDRESS:
CATY.AND 2th CODE: San Francisca, CA 94102
BRANCH NAME:

ON catitey|, Clerk

DEFENDANTS (BP)

CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation © eee Rae oA FEPLY
Bluntimited [T pimited Counter oot Joinder. e 08-27
{Aout AnpOUnt Filed sr with first 2 by defendant
Settee jemanded is (Cal. Rules ore rule 3.402)

ems 1-6 below must be comp
i ease type that best describes this case:

Auto Tort Provistonally Complex Civil Litigation
| Avto (22) Preach of contracvinarranty (05) 1, Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403)
Uninsured moveris (45) Rule $.750 collectioes (09). ‘Asvinrw/Trade vegetation (03)
Giher PUPBIVD (Personal Injury/Property [4 Other Coecions EE conseiction defect (19)
PyroseWronste Death) Tort egurance coverage (18) Mase ton (40)
Asbestos (04) rhe soreract OF} Securities litigation G8)
Proctet Rbilny 24) Real Property Envhommental / Toxic ort (30)
1] atedicat natprentice (4 [eminent domaininese Insurance coverage clair orising frome
© one revo), eondemnation (14) ise ot ene ptt
NonePLPDAWD (Other} Tort ‘Wrongful eviction 33} Enforcement of Judgment
‘Business tonvonfairtssinese prestice 07) Other reat property 26) TE] enorcement of fudement (20)
igi (08) intawhal Miscellancous Civit Complaint
Defymration {13} ‘Commercial 121) oO RICO?
Fra (16) Residential 62) 2) otter complaint (not specified above (42)
Iwitbecin property (9) Drags 09) ear
Professional negligencet25) Judicial Review ‘Miscellaneous Civil Petition
TO other neo. Pt PO WD tort 9) ‘Asset Hxtcture (5 portnership end corporate governance (22)
Eenployment A nowt Onher petition {not specified abows} (3)
1] wrong teernination (36) . ‘writ of mandate (02)

Other employment (15) ” Other judicfal review (39)

2. This case Cis BH isnot. complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Court. Ifthe case is complex, mark the factors
requiring exceptional judicial management:

a Large number of separately: represented parties eQ Large number. of witnesses
b. Q Eatensive. motion practice raising. Gifficult or novel e, Oo ‘Coordination andrelated actions pending tm one of more courts
issues thai will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states or countries, OF ina federal cout
¢. C] Substantial amount of documentary evidence .0 Substantial post: judgment judicial supervision

4, Remedies sought (check all that wel) a & nenetary ». Cl nonmonetary; declaratory of injunctive yelief a & punitive
4, Number of a ion (specify: #

5. This.case Os isnot a class action suit.

&. If there are any known related cases, 1 file and serve a noti

ice of related case. (You may ssa form. CM-OIS.)
De te( \
OLS, >
Be {SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)

rE OR PRINT
© Plains fT must fite this cover cover sheet with the first pete ling (event except goal ehaiens cases or cases filed under the Probate Coss,
Family Code, of Weifsre and ‘and instirutions Code). {Cal Fig in nan prs ‘lure 10 file may resuls in sanctions,
‘Pile this cover sheet in addition by local court mule.
Se
the action or proceeding.

« Untese this is 2 collections case unde mule 3.740 or a compler case, his cover sheet shall be used for statistical pumoses only. Page tof
Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET “Ee ae a Cot re 2 6: 4, 22.3 2H 8788

Iota Com of Coitorslo ‘ek Seanad othe Aeration, ek 28

ogee Sly LOM ‘oe roaritsPOBOX 8189
(835) 898-7553

222 RUSH LANDING ROAD
NOWATO, CALIFORNIA S91E-159,

BRAYTON ®PURCELE LLP
ATTORNEYS ATLAW

co c

‘

DAVID R, DONADIO, ESQ., S.B. #154436

JEFFREY D. WEHR, ESO. 3.5, SUMMONS ISSUED
BRAYTONSTURCELL LLP 2? ef Sey Stor Court
APR Eno en
aS! Ti 32
Now Ao, Calo in 9.4948-6 1 @ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Sil, = 1 2008
ovate, Cahiormia
(415) 898-1555 SORDUN Papi, Clerk
. Be Ciesk
Attorneys for Plaintiff 182009 +
De ee eae JUN 2PM PNATT
DEPARTMENT 206
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
. COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, ASBESTOS
0.
laintiff,
Plein, CGc-08-274719
vs. COMPLAINT FOR PERSONAL INJURY -
ASBESTOS

ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BoP
As Reflected on Exhibits B, C, G, H, i;
md [DOES 1-8500; and SEE ATTACHED

1, Plaintiff RUFUS ALEXANDER was born July £3, 1952.

2. The ©Brayton@Purcell Master Complaint for Personal Injury [and Loss of
Consortium]- Asbestos (hereinafter "Master Complaint”) was filed January 2, 2003, in San
Francisco Superior Court. A copy of the Master Complaint and General Order No. 55 may be
obtained upon request from Brayton? Purcell, and designated portions of the Master Complaint
are incorporated by reference herein pursuant to the authority conferred by General Order No. 55,
Plaintiff's claims are as set forth in said Master Complaint against defendants herein as follows:

tie GAGE 18 SUBIECT 7
u MANDATORY ELECTRONIG FILING
PURSUANT TO AMENDED 6.0, 188EXHIBIT 2BRA YTON@PURCELL LLP

AYTORNEYS AT LAW
322 RUSH LANDING ROAD

POBOX 6169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 92048-6565

ED AMEENSS

Oo oe SA MH B® ON

| ALAN R, BRAYTON, ESQ., 8.8. #73685

NANCY 7. WILLIAMS, ESQ,, 5.B. #201095

BRAYTON@®PURCELLLLP
Attorneys at Law.
BS Rush danding Road L .
0. Box . Ary
Novato, California 94948 “ NDP

(415) 898-1555

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, } ASBESTOS
. ) No, 274719
Plaintiff, 5
) NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
vs, 3 GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO
BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL - CIVIL

ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B%P) }

TO DEFENDANTS, AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 30, 2009, the Court entered the Order
Granting Attomey’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel » Civil, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Daed: Neoverieen 32009 — BRAYTONePU

By:
{iliams
-atorheys for Plaintif €

vse tous bNO8 beset gd L
ROTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL VELExhibit Ac mn ne

i
san pane he
tent TL aa TOnwer OR PARTY WATHOUT ATTORNEY Ure, sate be amg a oes:

OR GOURT USE ONLY

222 Rush Landing Road -

Novato, CA 94948-6169
ENDORSED
sexzononié wo. (415) 898-1955 «Pav 10. tniooat.(4 15) BOB-1247 = &
EMAIL ADIRESS (Options: San Francigeo County Superiod Court

_Avronney fon wane Plaintiffs) wn
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
stacer sores: 400 McAllister Street

OCT 3.0 2009

sangre GORDON PARICLI, Berk
Francisco 941 v __ JOCELYN C. ROOU
ny mae cove: San Francisco 94102 By: ._- SEER L2.BOGs Sor
| CASE NAMES ™ ™ ™ TV Sx uaa
RUPUS ALEXANDER v: ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BOP) BTA
° ~ nenung cate, detober 20, 2009
ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S pert. 30) ww 9:30 a.m.
MOTION TO. BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIMIL, serous won. Peter Busch

oarzacnonraceJuly- 1, 2008
ruereN/A i

4, The motion of name of efomey): Nancy T, Williams Esq.
to be ielieved a3 counsel of record for (name of ctiend: Rufus. Alexander, et al, ,
a party to this action of proceeding, came.on regularly for hearing at the dafe, tinve, and place indicated above.

2. The following persons were present at the hearing:

Crtbowten, Dou Srp Sager Parca LP

FINDINGS
3. Attorney has

a. [= personally served the client with papers in support of this motion,

- b. CEL served cent by mail and submitted a declaration establishing that the service. requirements of California Rules of Court,
rule 3.1962, have been satisfied.

4. Attorney has shown sufficient reasons why the motion to be relieved as counsel should be granted and why the attorney has brought
a motion under Coda of Civil Procedure section 284(2} instead of filing a consent under section 284(3).

ORDER
5, Attomeyt§ relieved as counsel of record for client
a, effective upon the filing of the proof of service of this signed order upon the client.
o. effective.on fapecily date}:

6 Treclents [XJ curtent [J iastknown address and telephone number:
Myr, Rafus Alexander, 179 Cashmere Street, Apt, D, San Francisca, Califomnia 94124

ifthe client's current address is known, service on the client must hereafter be-made al thal address unless otherwise ordered in item
15. tf the current address is not known, service must be made agoording to Code of Civit Procedure. section 1011 {b} and rule 3,282 of

the Caiifomia Rules of Court,
7. a, The next scheduled hearing in this action or proceeding is set for (date, time, and place):
Pt Spa ‘309 at 1:30 p.m., San Francisco Superior Court, Dept, 206
&, The hearing will concer (subject matte/):Status and Setting Conference.

NOTICE TO CLIENT
‘You or your new attorney, ¥ any, must prepare for and attend this hearing. Page 1062
“ae Ath Hardy Ose ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S : Gone) tat owas 42,
sia er doy 30 MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL Ee come ge

LexisNexis® Automated Californica Judicial Consett Farms

EXHIBIT. AVGASENUMBER,
WANG

8. The fotfowing additional hearings and other proceedings {including discovery matters} are set in this action, {describe the date,
time, place, and subject matter of each}.

S$. The trig! in this action or proceeding:
a, CX] isnot yet set
. [2] is settor (specify date, time, and piace}:

10. Client is hereby notified of the following effects this order may have upon parties.

NOTICE TO CLIENT

Your present atermey will no longer ba reprasenting you. You may notin most cases represent yourself Ifyou are.
one of the. Parties on the following list.

2 Aguardian + Apersanal representative + Aguardian ad item
+ Aconservator « Aprobate fiduciary + An unincorporated association
+ Atrustee + Acorporation

ff-you are one of these partles, YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY. SEEK LEGAL ADVICE REGARDING LEGAL
REPRESENTATION. Failure to retain.an attorney may lead to an order striking the pleadings of to the entry of a
default judgment,

it. Glientis notified that, if the client will be representing himself or herself, the client shail be solely responsible for the case.

NOTICE TO-CLIENT WHO WILL BE UNREPRESENTED
‘You will not have an attorney representing you, You may wish to seek legal assistance, if you.do not have a new
altorney to represent you In thls action er proceeding, and you are legally permitted to.do so, you wit be
representing yourself, I will be your responsibility to comply with all court rules and.applicable laws. if you fail to
49 $0, of fail fo appear at hearings, action may be taken agate inst you, You may lose your case.

|
Ld

42. Client is, notified that iLis the client's duty. to keep ihe court informed at alllimes of the offent’s current address,

NOTICE TO CLIENT WHO WILL BE UNREPRESENTED
‘The court needs.to know how te. contact you. if you de not keep the court and other parties informed of your current
“ address and telephone number, they will not be able to.send.you notices.of actions that may affect you, Including
actions that may adversely affect your interests or result In your losing the case,

43. The court further orders (specify):

Date: 10 f>ef aq

URGE OF suosmia, CrribeR
A. BUSCH

GE i Day 5. 2007, ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S Peo tof
MOTIGN TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL—CIVIL

LexisNexis® Autortated Califirnia dudictal Council Formswe ND HB YN

POROX 8169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94048-6469
(415) 898-1555

ATTORNEYS AT LAW.
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD

BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP

ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESQ., $.B. Ar s8s
NANCY T, WILLIAMS, ESO. S.B. #201095
BRAYTONSPURCELL LLP

Attorneys at Law

222 Rush Landing Road

P.O, Box 6169

Novato, California 94948

(415) 898-1555

Atiomeys for Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, ASBESTOS
No. 274719
Plaintiff,

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO
BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL - CIVIL,

¥S.

>
j
§ PROOFS OF SERVICE OF ORDER AND
)
>
ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BYP) 5

Aillsunedht Geos piROO$. NOK ond oe wed

1
BROORS OF SERVICE OF OROGR AND NOTICE GP ENTRY GF ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION FO BE RELIEVED AS
COUNSEL - CIVIL,‘ATTORNEYS AT LAW

BRAYTON@PURCELL LLP
222 RUSH LANDING ROAD,

i PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL

2 Tam employed in.the County of Marin, State of California. 1 am over the age of 18
ars and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 222 Rush Landing Road,
3) P.O, Box'6169, Novato, California 94948-6169.
4 On November.3, 2009, | served the following document(s) described as:
3 ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS
6 COUNSEL - CIVIL
3 on the interested party(ies) in this action ‘as follows:
Rufus Alexander
8} 170 Cashmere Street, Apt, D
5 San Francisco, CA 94124
{0
4 ww. BY PERSONAL MAILING: ‘
I deposited in the U.S, Mail at Novato, California, the’above-described document(s), in a
12 sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, addressed to. the party(ies) as stated above.
g
2 13
2 id XX BY OFFICE MAILING
Sak
3 2 Tam readily familiar with this office's practice of collection and processin,

SR2 15 correspondence, pleadings and other matters for mailing widy.the United States Postal
233 Service on that same day with postage thereon fully Prepaid at Novato, California in the
g 16 ordinary course of business. | placed in the outgoing office mail, the above-described

= document(s), in.a sealed envelope, addressed to the party(ies) as stated above, for.
g VF collection and processing for mailing the same day in accordance with ordinary office
18. practices,

Executed November 3, 2009, at Novato, California.

i9 .
I declare under penalt{_of perjury tinder ile laws of the St sof California that the

20} foregoing is true and correct.

s Ale) ny. Asbest
San Francisco Superior Court C

PROOF GF SERVICE BY MARL.BRAYTON@ PURCELL LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW:

222 RUSH LANDING ROAD

PO BOX S169
NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 95948-6169

415) 8981555,

~~ oe NM A OR hm WON

PROOF OF SERVICE BY LEXIS-NEXIS E-SERVICE.

1am employed in the County of Marin, State of California. J am over the age of 18
ears and am not.a party to the within action, My business address is.222 Rush Landing Road,
.Q, Box, 6169, Novato, California, 94948-6169,

On November 3, 2009, | electronically served (E-Service), pursuant to General Order.
No, 158, the following documents:

NOTICE OF ENTRY. OF ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY'S MOTION TOBE
RELIEVED AS COUNSEL- CIVIL

on the interested parties.in this action by causing Lexis-Nexis E-service program pursuant to
General Order No, 158, to transmit.a true copy thereof to the following party(ies):

SEE ATTACHED LIST

The above document was transmitted by Lexis-Nexis E-Service and the transmission
was reported.as complete and without error.

Executed on November 3, 2009, at Novato, California.
Stale of California that the

I declare under penalty of perjury undeg
foregoing is true and correct.

tos Defendants
‘ourt Case No. 2

Rufus ander vy, As'
Sen Francisco Superior

PATS

PROG OF SERVILE BY ESER WINE,Brayton-Purcell Service List

Bate Crested: 21/3/2008-12:02:30 PM

Created by: LitSuppore - ServiceLise - Reporting
Matter Number: 108666.001 - Rufug Alexander

Bassi, Edlin, Haie & Blum LLP
351 California Street, fue 200
San Francisco, CA
415-397-0006 Aisa9 ine (fax)
Defendants:
Carliste Corporation (CARLIS}
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PARKHP)

Berry & Berry
P.O. Box 16070
2930. Lakeshore fyerwe
Oakland, C:
S10-835-1 2590" *eNe83s- 5117 (fax)
Defendants:
Berry & Berry (B&B).

Gordon & Rees LLP
101 West a
Suite. J000

§19-696-6 i 7g. 1696-7124 {fax}
Defendants:
Hennessy Industries, Inc. (HENNES)

Keesal, Young & Logan
450 Pacific Avenue ‘04
San Francisco, CA 94
445-398-6000 415- be 0136 (fax)
Defendants:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holdings Corp.
EAR)

Law Offices of Glaspy & Glaspy
One Walnut Crock Center
100 Pring He Avenue, 6 Suite 738
Wainut Creek, CA
925-947-1300 Shs. Sa)-1s84 {fax)
oer a (CLARKE)
jask Equipment Company
Garlock ‘Sealing ‘Teennolosies, Lic
(GARECK}

Oium Reyen & Pryor
Attorneys. at Law
Street, jute B10

220. Montgor
San Frangisca, CA D4)
Stee bat “$300. Asa 1254 (fax)

Fiat USA ine. (RIATUS)

Becherer, Kannett & Schweitzer
Water Tower.
128 Powell | Sucet .
ile, CA 94608-2606

08s 3 Sto ese TSI (fax)
Defdants

ridges ceepgerenione North American,
the LLC (PRSTN,

Br Brydon, Huge & Parker
Main Street, aw Ficor
Sen Francisca, CA 9
415-808-0300 41 $408.0333 (fax)
Defendants:
Dana Companies, LLC (fka Dana
Corpatation) (DANA)
Pnenme Abex LLC (ABEX)
oye M Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc,
{TOYOTA)

Gordon & Rees LLP

Embarcadero Center West

275 Battery, Street, 2 Floor

San Francisco, Ci

415-986-5900 SiEsee tose {faxp

Defendants:
Actuant Corporation {ACTCOR)
Budd. Company, The. (BUDD)

Krieg, Keller Sloan Reiley & Roman

‘Elleen Reilly, Bs
UF aascne Si, Ae Pidor

San wiseo, CA SAIC4
Te Sinene AS Ns. 8353 (fax)
Defendants:
‘Nacco Materials Handling Group, Inc.
ACCO)

MeKenna Long & Aldridge
10} California Street

41" Floor
San Francisco, CA 9411)
415-267-4000. 415-267-4198 (fax)
Defendants:

Maremont Corporation (MAREMT)

Perkins Coie LLP
1888 Century Park E
Suite 1700
‘Las s Angeles CA 90067.
S1Q788-9900 310-788 L539 (fax)
Defendants:

Boeing Company, The (BOEING)

(BW!

1
Run By. : Harwood, Jennifer '$,
(age)

Bennett, Samueisen, » eynelds & Allard.
1301 Marina Village Par!
Suite 300
Alameda, CA 94501-1084
510-446-7688 510-444-5849 (fax).
Defendants:

_ Gatke Corporation (GATKE)

Burnham & Brown
1901 Harrison Street
LI Floor
Oakland, CA 946]
$40-444-6806 3 ibe 835-6666 (fox}
Defendants:
< Borg-Warner Corporttion by its Successor
in Interest eae gore Wamer Morse TEC Inc.

Jackson & Wallace

59 0 ranciseo. Street

Sixth Floo:

San Praneisco, CA 94133
415-982-6300 415-982-6700 (fax)

; Defendants:

Cummins Ine, (CUMING)

Lankford & Crawford LLP
2 Theatre Square

Suite 240
Orinds, CA 94863

925-258-' soon 923-258-9695 (fax)
Defendants:

Ford Motor Company (FORD)

Nixon Penbody LLP
One Eoibsrcadero
18" Ploor
Saa Francises, CA 9411
A15-984-8200 866-~ Sen 6538 (fax)
Defendants: +

Mack Trucks, inc, (MACKTR)

Perkins Cots ULF
Four Embarcadero Genter, Suite 2490
San Francisco, CA 941}
415-344-7000" 415- saree (fax)
Defendants:
Honeywell International, inc. (HONEY W)Brayvon-Purcell garvice Lint
Date Created: 11/3/2009-12:02:30 PM

Created by: Litsupport.- Sexvicelist - Reporting
Matter Number: 19856¢.001 - Rifue Alexander

Schiff Hardin LLP cpwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold.
One Market Plaza ae arket Pla: ome .
Spear Street Tower, 32° Floor Steuart Tower, 8" Floor
San Francisco, CA 94405 San Francisco, CA 94105
Als! 903-8700 445-90 1-B701 (fax) 415-781-7900 415.’ 812635 (fax),
Defendants: Defendanta:

Deere Ee Company (DEERE) Gatke Corporation: (OATRE)

Scandura, Inc, (SCANDU}

Run fy ; Harwood, Jennifer. $:

{UBH}

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman &
‘Bicker L
528 Market Street, $7" Floor
San Francisca, CA 94405-2725
418-433-0990" “415. 434-1370 (fax)
Defendants:

American. Honda Motor Co., Inc,
(AHMOCQ)

2EXHIBIT 31 Dm

ORIGINAL

ek tet
we oe

“puepegy

SeuaAy DOARONET GTET
vonbiegsag ae juamarag y
a
ws

oto Ort tere) suey
A

019} ew
AWS F AWE
Be RoR oe
SB SR RRBRBESRREREBSE

|
NO, 4

BERRY & B
A Professional € Corporation

2930 Lakeshore Avenue FE we L ee 1 D

Oakland, CA 94610. o See hee atomia
Telephone: (510) 250-0200,
AUG - 9 2010

Designated Defense Cor
K OF THE COURT
wv nee
Deputy Clerk

f
|
1
SUPERIOR COURT UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Laura Przetale E Bsa, , CSB | 118301

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, NO, CGC-08-274719
i
Plaintifi(s), | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
i ORDER
¥, i
| Date: August 4, 2009
PNEUMO ABEX LLC, ét a}. Time: 1:30 p.m.
it Dept.: 220 — Hon. Harold E. Kahn
Defendani(s). ! Trial Date: None Set

/ Filing Date: July 1, 2608

A Case Management Conference was held on August 4, 2010 at-1:30 p.m. before the
Honorable Harold E. Kahn. Plaintite Rufus Alexander, Designated Defense Counsel through
Berry & Berry, and various counse for defendants appeared. Based on the fact plaintiff Rufus
Alexander bas not yet retaingd counsel or fully participated in his deposition, the court again
encouraged plaintiff Rufus i to seek legal representation, and issued the following
orders. ,

Plaintiff Rufus Alexahder isto appear for deposition on October 18, 2010 at 10:00.a.m, at
the office of Aiken & Welch, located at 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1520, San Francisco
California, phone number ais) 981-1580, If plaintiff fails to attend this deposition or fully
participate in his deposition, the court will consider motions to exclude his testimony.. Such
motions, and any other diseovery motions, shall be noticed for November 18, 2010 at 1:30 p.m.
in Department 220,

Proposed Order: Danving Motion fer Preference .

"San Praneisco Superior Court No. 274492
Page tof 2ah, 4

A further Case Management Conference will be heard on. November 18, 2010 at. 1:30
p.m. in Department 220 of the above-entitled court.

DATED: August 4 , 20s

|

Flonovabté Harold E. Kahn
Judge of the Superior Court

* s74719
ALERANDER. v. ASB. DEFTS.,

oO 0 I DA vA BR ww

met
>

we
pm

a

Amnaa @ anisa
8S Seu 8 BOG

BoN MP NM YY Rw
es AM SO HN

{Péoposed] Order frenying Motion for. Preference
Elyin/Marracet Wambolt y. All
| San Francisco Superior Court No. Tan
Page 2 of 2SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

'

Document Scanning Lead Sheet
i Aug-10-2010 8:63 am
|

Case Number; CGC-08-274718
Filing Date: Aug-09-2010 8:52
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02935072

ORDER

|

RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS

|

001002935072

instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of

document to be scanned.

eBAtha AWadE

ceerose tots) uegdopE,

ORIGINAL

Co we AD A Fw

16

~ . : ~

Laura Przetak, Esq., CSB No. 118301
BERRY & BERR’ ‘I y |
rofessional Corporation. |
2930 Lakeshore ‘Avenue : F I a tO
Oakland, CA 94610 od Seeins Coot Calo
Telephone: (510) 250-02
AUG ~ 9 2010

Designated Defense Couns
CLERK OF THE COURT
: BY. fediny ie
: 4 Depuly Clark

SUPERIOR-COURT - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
RUFUS ALEXANDER, NO. CGC-08-274719
Plaintiff(s), | CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
| ORDER
* i Date: August 4, 2009

PNEUMO ABEX LLC; ét al, Time: 1:30 p.m,
Dept: 220 Hon. Harold E. Kabn
Defendant(s).

‘Trial Date: None Set
i _! Filing Date: July 1, 2608.

A Case Management Conference was held on August'4, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. before the
Honorable Harold E. Kahn. Plaine Rufus Alexander, Designated Defense Counsel through
Berry & Berry, and various qransel for defendants appeared. Based on the fact plaintiff Rufus
Alexander has not -yet retained courisel or fully participated in his deposition, the court again
encouraged plaintiff Rufus Alexander to seek legal representation, and issued the following
orders.

Plaintiff Rufus Alexander is to appear for deposition on October 18, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. at
the office-of Aiken & Welch, located at 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1520, San Francisco
California, phone number ais 981-1580. If plaintiff fails to attend this deposition or fully
participate in his deposition, the court will consider motions to exclude his testimony. Such
motions, and any. other discovery motions, shall be noticed for November 18, 2010 at 1:30 p.m.
in Department 220.

i

!
Proposed} Order Denying Motion for Preference
EI via rgaret Wambott y, Allis Chalmers, et al.
San Franciseo Superior Court No. 274492
} Page fof
:oe eS St DW BR BH Nw

fee kk
BW No

crses EMORRD "peep.
A

“tivonly SIMO HSE,
eomuseding EY UOT ¥

outmost (915) seem,
AWG ¥ AWM
Roe
So Ob 8 sO

bo yoN N Ne
BRRREREBBRE

Sh 4

A further Case vane Conference will be heard on November 18, 2010 at 1:30
p.m. in Department 220 of the above-entitled court.

DATED: . August 4, 20 .
Hon € Harold E. Kahn
Judge. of the Superior Court

” 374719
ALESANDER v ASB. DEFTS |

[Pfoposed] Order Denying Motion for Preference

Elvin’Marearct Wambolt v. Allig-Chatmers, et al.

San Francisco Superior Court No. 274492
Page 2of227

‘Tien ios7 logsesziang

Rufus Alexander v. Asbestos Defendants (B &P), et.al.
San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-08-274719
Our Client: The Budd Company

PROOF OF SERVICE

Lam a resident of the State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and nota. party
to the within action. My business address is: Gordon & Rees LLP, 275 Battery Street, Suite
2000, San Francisco,CA 94111. On the date below, I served the.document(s) described as
follows:

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT THE
BUDD COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF
[CODE CIV. PROC. § 128.7}

by having personally delivered via First Legal Support Services messenger the
Cl
document(s) listed above to the person(s) at the address(es) set forth below.

oO by placing true copy(ies) of the: document(s) listed above enclosed in. a sealed
envelope, at a station designated for collection and processing of envelopes and
packages for overnight delivery by FEDEX as part of the ordinary business practices
of Gordon & Rees LLP. described below, addressed as follows:

by transmitting via FACSIMILE the document(s) listed above to the following:
by placing the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope with postage thereon

fally prepaid, in UNITED STATES. MAIL in the State of California, at San Francisco,
addressed as set forth below.

&} O

Tam readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collection and processing
correspondence: for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S.
Postal Service. on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid in the ordinary
course of business. | am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed.
invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date.is more than one day after the
date of deposit, for mailing in affidavit.

Rufus Alexander Plaintiff in Pro Per
In Pro Per

17) Cashmere Street, Apt. D

San Francisco, CA 94124

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is. true and correct.
Executed on October 1, 2010, at San Francisco, California. L

TMA Anz. Le L£. te
Marie Saho. ©

PROOF OF SERVICE