arrow left
arrow right
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • RUFUS ALEXANDER VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Gordon & Rees LLP 101 West Broadway Suite 2000 San Diego, CA 92101 ROGER M. MANSUKHANI (SBN: 164463) STEVEN SOBEL (SBN: 177210) K.C, SWISHER (SBN: 245238) ELECTRONICALLY KURT E. GILABERT (SBN: 178563) FILED GORDON & REES LLP Superior Court of California, 101 West Broadway County of San Francisco Suite 2000 APR 06 2011 San Diego, CA 92101 Clerk of the Court Phone: (619) 696-6700 BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Fax: (619) 696-7124 Deputy Clerk Attorneys for Defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA - COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE RUFUS ALEXANDER, CASE NO. CGC-08-274719 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT MATTERS IN REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS BE DEEMED ADMITTED AND FOR SANCTIONS VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B%P) as Reflected on Exhibits B, C, G, H, 1, and DOES 1-8500; and SEE ATTACHED LIST. [Filed concurrently with Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Kurt Gilabert; and [Proposed] Order] Hearing Date: June 7, 2011 Time: 1:30 p.m. Dept.: 220 Judge: Hon. Harold E. Kahn Complaint: — July 1, 2008 Trial date: Not Set Ne ee ee a ee a a Ne ee! ee! TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 7, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. in Department 220 of the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, located at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California, Defendant Hennessy Industries, Inc. (“Hennessy”) will move this Court for an order pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.280 that matters in Request for Admissions, Set One, be deemed admitted by Plaintiff Rufus Alexander (“Plaintiff”). Hennessy also moves for imposition of discovery sanctions pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2033.280(c) in the amount of $900.00, The motion is made on -1- DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS BE DEEMED ADMITTED AND SANCTIONS~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ap 3” aesig aea2 14 é2 315 16 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ZRCHFOS2TIONSEEEIOT. t the grounds that the Request for Admissions is relevant to the subject matter of this action, and that Plaintiff has failed to serve responses. The motion is based on this Notice of Motion, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the Declaration of Kurt E. Gilabert, as well as all papers, records and other documentary evidence on file, deemed on file, or may be submitted at the time this Motion is heard and oral argument at the hearing on this Motion. Dated: April 6, 2011 GORDON & REES LLP » LECLLE Roger M. Mansukhani Steven Sobel K.C. Swisher Kurt E. Gilabert Attorneys for Defendant HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. -2- DEFENDANT HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS BE DEEMED ADMITTED AND SANCTIONS