arrow left
arrow right
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
  • Sudarshan Toor vs Tirath Singh / LC39 Unlimited - Other Judicial Review document preview
						
                                

Preview

DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT Department of Industrial Relations E-FILED State of California 4/16/2019 9:02 AM By: Patrick C. McManaman, SBN 254821 Superior Court of California Scott L. Jones, SBN 250974 770 E. Shaw Avenue, Suite 222 County of Fresno Fresno, California 937 1 0 By: C. York, Deputy Te1.: (559) 244-5348 WOONQLJIAUJNH Attorne s for the State Labor Commissioner and on ehalf of Plaintiff / Respondent SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY 0F FRESNO SUDARSHAN TOOR, Case N0. 19CECG00819 Plaintiff / Respondent, DECLARATION OF COUNSEL PATRICK C. McMANAMAN IN SUPPORT OF V. MOTION T0 DISMISS UNTIMELY APPEAL OF TI-IE LABOR TIRATH SINGH, an individual dba COMMISSIONER’S ORDER, DECISION SANGHERA TRUCK LINE, OR AWARD; AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES [Exemptfrom fees pursuant to Labor Code Defendant / Appellant. Section I 01 et seq.] NNNNNNNNNHHwHHpflHH.‘ mflomhmwwowwumm#wN—O Filed Concurrently Herewith: Notice ofMotion Memorandum ofPoints and Authorities [Proposed] Order Hearing Schedule: Date : May 16, 2019 Time : 10:00 a.m. Dept. :404 Trial Date: June 5, 2019 / / / / / / // / Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion Recycled Paper I, Patrick C. McManaman, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at law duly licensed to practice before all courts of the State of California and am counsel to the State Labor Commissioner of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations. In my capacity as staff counsel, I represent the interests of the State Labor Commissioner; and in this matter, I concurrently represent the interests of Plaintiff / \DOOVO‘xkh-h Respondent, SUDARSHAN TOOR. I have reviewed the materials in the file pertaining to this matter. If called to testify, I could and would competently testify to the facts as stated in this declaration. - 2. The documents and records in the Labor Commissioner case of Sudarshan Toor v. 10 Tirath Singh, an individual dba Sanghera Truck Line, originated in the Fresno District Office of the 11 Labor Commissioner as State Case No. WC—CM-454903. Those documents were kept and maintained 12 by the Fresno District Office, in the ordinary course of business in a file created specifically for that ' 13 case. 14 3. 011 July 3, 201 8, an administrative hearing, known as a Berman Hearing, was conducted 15 by the Labor Commissioner before a Hearing Officer. The case file and testimonial records indicate 16 that Mr. Toor and Mr. Singh were present at the scheduled adj udicatory hearing. 17 4. On November 27, 2018, the Labor Commissioner issued an Order, Decision or Award 18 (hereinafier “0rder”), awarding wages 0n béhalf 0f Mr. Toor against Defendant / Appellant. The Order 19 awarded $10,355.24 to Mr. Toor, which represented unpaid wages, liquidated damages, waiting time 20 penalties and accrued interest. Included on the face page of the Order is a delineation of appellate 21 rights and procedures, including the prerequisite to post an undertaking as a condition t0 filing an 22 appeal. 23 Labor Code section requires as a condition filing 98.2(b) to an appeal against an Order, 24 Decision 0r Award ofthe Labor Commissioner, that an employer shall first post a bond or undertaking 25 with the court for the amount 0f the ODA; and the employer shall provide written notice to the other 26 parties and the Labor Commissioner of that posting. 27 28 Declaration of Counsel in Support of Motion Recycled Paper A true and correct copy of the first page of the above-referenced ODA is attached as Exhibit I . 5. On February 21, 2019, the Order was served via first~class mail upon Defendant / Appellant. A true and correct copy of the proof of service is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 6. As staff counsel for the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, I have expended 3 .00 hours in reviewing, interviewing, drafting, appearing and litigating this matter. \DOOQONmAmMH 7. I have been in the practice 0f law for over ten years primarily in areas 0f employment and labor litigation. My hourly rate is$300.00 per hour, which is below that of the customary hourly rate for attorneys with equal experience in the areas of labor and employment. Thus, reasonable ”attorney’s fees incurred on behalf of Mr. Toor total $900.00. Ideclare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State 0f California that the foregoing . istrue and correct. Executed this H/ day of April, 2019, at Fresno, California.