arrow left
arrow right
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
  • MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA UNLAWFUL DETAINER - RESIDENTIAL document preview
						
                                

Preview

nA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-30-2008 10:10 am Case Number: CUD-08-627634 Filing Date: Oct-29-2008 10:09 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02300845 DEMAND FOR JURY MARIO CASTRO VS. ANTONIO GARCIA 001002300845 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.ANTONIO GARCIA 1091 Bush Street, #316 Fi San Francisco, CA 94109 San Francisco County Superior Court (415) 623-2403 OCT 2 9 7n0r Defendant In Pro. Per. GORPON PARK Clerk & BY: jeputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT -- LIMITED JURISDICTION goo2 6 3 190 (8 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MARIO R. CASTRO, No. 627634 Plaintiff DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AND MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ANTONIO GARCIA, et al., Defendants Defendant ANTONIO GARCIA hereby demands a trial by jury of all issues and a mandatory settlement conference in the above-entitléd case. Dated: October 29, 2008 ANT GARCIA Defendant In Pro. Per. Trial Date: Not yet set Jury DemandANTONIO GARCIA 1091 Bush Street, #316 San Francisco, CA 94109 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL CASE NAME: CASTRO v. GARCIA, et al. CASE NO.: 627634 l, f vite. Lei 6 rlLe if , declare as follows: I am, employed within the City and County of San Francisco. My business address. is EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE, 995 Market Street, #1200, San Francisco, California 94103. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years of age and not a party to the within action. I am readily familiar with the EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Correspondence so collected and processed is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On October. 29, 2008, in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure Section 1013a (3), I served the following: ?rygwer>and Jury Deman upon PLAINTIFF MARIO R. CASTRO, by placing the same at the EVICTION DEFENSE COLLABORATIVE for deposit in the United States Postal Service on that date in an envelope addressed as follows: GUADALUPE GAMINO 1169 Howard, #204 San Francisco, CA 94103 I sealed the envelope and placed it for collection and mailing on that date following ordinary business practices, in the City and County of San Francisco, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on October 29, 2008 at San Francisco, California. Proof of Service by Mail