arrow left
arrow right
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

U0 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-16-2012 3.32 pm Case Number: CGC-12-518307 : Filing Date: Feb-16-2012 3:29 Juke Box: 001 Image: 03498053 COMPLAINT MARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORA 001003498053 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.suifMons (CITACION JUDICIAL) (S046 PARAUSO DELACORTE) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC., a {AVISO AL DEMANDADO): California Corporation; Does 1 to 50, inclusive YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE; (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN NOTICE! You have besn sued. The court may dacide against you without your being heard untess you respond within 30 days. Read tha information below. ‘You have 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this summons and legal papers are served on you to file a written response al this court and have a copy served on the plaintiff. A letter or phone call will not protect you. Your writtan rasponse must be in proper legal form Hf you want the court to hear your case. There may be a court form that you can use for your rasponse. You can find these court forms and more information at the California Courts ‘Online Self-Help Center (www.courtinio.ca.gov/selfhelp), your county law Iibrary, or the courthouse nearest you. if you cannot pay the filing fee, ask the court clerk for a fee waiver form. If you do nat file your response on time, you may lose the case by default, and your wages, money, and property’ may be taken without further warning from the court, There are other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attomey, you may want to call an altomey feferral service. If you cannot afford an attomey, you may be eligible for free legal services from a nonprofit laga? services program. You can locate these nonprofit groups at the Callfornia Legal Services Web site (www./awheipcalifornia.org), the Callfomia Courts Online Self-Help Center {www. courtinfo.ca.gov/selthelp), or by contacting your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has e statutory lien for waived fees and costs on any settlement of arbitration award of $10,000 or more in a civil case. The court's lien must be paid before the court will dismiss the casa. JAVISO! Lo han demandado. SI no responde dentro de 30 dias, le corte puede decidir en su contra sin escuchar su version. Lea Ie informacion & continuacién Tiane 30 DIAS DE CALENDARIO después de que ie entreguen este citecién y papeles /egales pare presentar une respuesta por escrito en esta corte y hacer que sa entregue une copia al demandante. Una carta o una llamada telefénica no fo protegen. Su respuesta por escrito tfene que estar @n formato legal correcio si desea que procesen su caso en Ja corte. Es posible que haya un formulerio qua usied puada usar para su respuesta. Puede encontrar estos formutarios de ja corte y ms Informacién en e! Centro de Ayuda de as Cortes de Califomia {www.sucorte.ca.gov), 6/1 la biblioteca de leyes de su condedo o en a corte que le queda mds carce. Sino puede pagar lo cuota da presentacién, pide a! secrotario da la corte que le dé un formulario de exencién de pago de cuotas. Sino presenta su respueste a tiempo, puede perder el caso por incumplimiento y la corte ja podré quiter su susido, dinero y bienes sin mds advertencia Hay otros requisites legates. Es recomendabie que llama a un abogado inmedielamente. Sino conoce a un abogado, puede Lamar a un servicio de remisi6n a abogados. Sino puede ra un abogado, es posible que cumple con Jos rsquisitos para obtener servicios legates gratuitos de un programa de servicios fegalas sin fines de lucro. Puade encontrar estos grupos sin fines da lucro en ol sitio web de Califomia Legal Services, (www. lawhalpcalifornia.org), en ef Centro de Ayuda de las Cortes de California, (www.sucorta.ca.gov) o poniéndose en contacto con Is core o ef colegio da ebogados locales. AVISO: Por fey, le corte tiene derecho a reclamar las cuolas y fos costos exentos por imponer un gravamen sobre cualquier recuperacién de $10,000 6 mas da velor recibide mediante un acuerdo 0 une concesién de arbitraje en un caso de derecho civil. Tlene que pagar ef gravamen de Ia corte antes de que Ja corte pueda desechar a! caso. e name and address of the court 1s: [case NuMBER: (Et nombre y direccién de ta corte es): Nimero del Caso): SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 0 7 400 McAllister Street ¢ San Francisco, CA 94102 - ~ The name, address, and telephone number of plaintiffs attomey, or plaintiff without an attorney, is: BY (El nombre, le direccién y el nimero de teléfono det abogado de! demandante, 0 dal demandante que no fiena abogado, es): SCOTT H. WECHSLER (SBN 100452) p/777-9700 415/948-2134 LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT H. WECHSLER 595 Market Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105-2818 cou DATE: OaTE: FEB 162012 pyERKOFTHE (For proof of service of this summons, use Proof of Service o (Para prueba de entrega de esta citation use el formulario Pros ge y NOTICE TO THE PERSON SE! t. __” as an individual defendant. 2. : a the person sued under the fictitious name pf (speed 3. [= on behalf of (specify): under: ‘| CCP 416.10 (corporation) 1 CCP 416,60 (minor) i._, CCP 416.20 (defunct corporation) {] CCP 416.70 (conservatee) | SCP 416.40 (association or partnership) {| CCP 416,90 (authorized person) . ' other (specify): = 4.) by personal delivery on (date): Page 1 oft rset CancnetCaltona” SUMMONS oe Gado of Ga roceirn 6541220, a68 SUM-100 [Rev. Juyy 1. 2009} (eePLD-P1-004 ‘FOR COURT USE ONLY "ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, Siate Bar number, ond aadress): SCOTT H. WECHSLER {SBN 100452) LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT H. WECHSLER 595 Market Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105-2818 revepuone no, 415/777-9700 FAKNO (Optonay 415/948-2134 street aooress 400 McAllister Street wauncaporess 400 McAllister Street cmvanozpcone San Francisco, CA 94102 BRANCH NAME: PLAINTIFF: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE; BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN FILED COURT, “oR eee cep 16 2012 e THE COURT g ay Cem DEFENDANT: PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC., a California Corporation; [X] poesi7O 50, inclusive COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death [7 AMENDED (Number): CLERKS Type (check all that apply): (__] MOTOR VEHICLE a THER (specify): LOSS OF CONSORTIUM Property Damage Wrongfut Death GENERAL NEGLIGENCE CX] Personal Injury __} Other Damages specify): Premises Liability jurisdiction (check al! that apply): (_] ACTION IS A LIMITED CIVIL CASE Amount demanded __| does not exceed $10,000 iT exceeds $10,000, but does not exceed $25,000 ACTION !S AN UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE (exceeds $25,000) ACTION IS RECLASSIFIED by this amended complaint fram Umited to unlimited from unlimited to limited 1. Plaintiff (name or names):BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE; BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN alleges causes of action against defendant (name or names): PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.; DOES 1 to 50, inclusive 2. This pleading, including attachments and exhibits, consists of the following number of pages: six 3. Each plaintiff named above is a competent adult . [__] except plaintiff (name): BY F ~} a comoration qualified to do business in Califomia Q) ‘an unincorporated entity (describe): (3) C_] a public entity (describe): (4) [| aminor ©} an adult ~"| for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate or a guardian ad litem has been appointed > other (specify): “| other (specify): xcept plaintiff (name). a corporation qualified to do business in California an unincorporated entity (describe): } a public entity (describe): 4) aminor [| | anadult (a) | ._] for whom a guardian or conservator of the estate os a guardian ad litem has been appointed (b) i.) other (specify): () (_} other (specify): (7) Information about additional plaintifis who are not competent adults is shown in Attachment 3. page tots Form Approved ier Optional Use COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property ‘Code of Civil Procadiow. § 425.12 puBtPvoot fan, Janay © 2007) Damage, Wrongful Death nsSHORT TITLE: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE v. PROVEN MAN, AGEMENT, INC. 4. Plaintiff (name): is doing business under the fictitious name (specify): ” and has complied with the fictitious business name laws. 5. Each defendant named above is a natural person a. |X! except defendant (nama): PROVEN c MANAGEMENT, INC. (1) |} @ business organization, form unknown (2) |X 3 acorporation (3) © ~~ an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) {+ @ public entity (describe): (5) { _} other (specify): | except defendant (name): a. a business organization, form unknown i @ corporation (3) (”} an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) |") a public entity (describe): (8) [7 other (specify): |} except defendant (name): (1) ” a business organization, form unknown (2) a corporation Q) an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) |: a public entity (describe): (8) |; other (specify): except defendant (name): (1) | | a business organization, form unknown (2); | a corporation (3) |.) an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) | | @ public entity (describe): (5) i | other (specify): [., }Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5. 6. The true names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to plaintiff. a.°X.) Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 1_to 50, inclusive. were the agents or employees of other named defendants and acted within the scope of that agency or employment. b. [%_} Doe defendants (spacify Doe numbers): 1 to 50, inclusive are persons whose capacities are unknown to plaintiff. r 7. [71 Defendants who are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names): 8. This court is the proper court because : at least one defendant now resides in its jurisdictional area. a. b. c. d. i "other (specify): } the principal place of business of a defendant corporation or unincorporated association is in its jurisdictional area. } injury to person or damage to personal property occurred in its jurisdictional area. o "! Plaintiff is required to comply with a claims statute, and a. |_| has complied with applicable claims statutes, or b. {° ] is excused from complying because (specify): PUD-PL-00I (Rov. Januatty §. 2007] COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death Pogo 2ef3PLD-Pi-004 SHORT TITLE SUL 10. The folowing causes of action are attached and the statements above apply to each (each complaint must have one er more causes of action aitached} ae Motor Vehicle . General Negligence Intentional Ton Producis Liability Premises Liability Other (specify) 11, Plaintiff has suffered a. wage loss loss of use of property hospital and medical expenses general damage property damage joss of earning capacity other damage (specify): for such other enses; attorney's deem proper. 12 The damages claimed for wrongful death and the relationships of plaintiff to the deceased are a listed in Attachment 12 b. as follows: 13. The relief sought in this complaint is within the jurisdiction of this court, Plaintiff prays for judgment for costs of suit; for such relief as 1s fair, just, anc equitable; and for a. (1) X compensatory damages (2) punitive damages The amount of damages is (in cases for personal injury or wrongful death, you must check (1)): (1) % according to proof (2) in the amount of: 45. The paragraphs of this complaint alleged on information and belief are as follows (specify paragraph numbers): Date: February 15, 2012 , EE v S:SHATURE OF PLAITHIFE OR ATTORNEY) COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Page 3083 Damage, Wrongful DeathSHORTTITLE: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE v. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, PLD-P1-001(2) First CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence Page 4 (number) ATTACHMENT TO .X Complaint Cross - Complaint (Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of action.) GN-1. Plaintiff (name): BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE; BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN alleges that defendant (name): PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.; and LX. Does 1 to 50, inclusive was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. By the following acts or omissions to act, defendant negligently caused the damage to plaintiff on (date): April 20, 2010 at (place); Victoria Canal Pump Station, 21000 Hwy 4, Holt, California, Contra Costa County (description of reasons for tlability): Defendants, and each of them, through their agents and employees acting within the course and scope of their employment, failed to exercise ordinary care, including but not limited to: negligently owning, negligently maintaining, negligently creating, negligently operating, negligently instructing, and negligently overseeing property and work thereon such that Plaintiff was subjected to an unreasonable risk of harm which ultimately caused Plaintiff to be injured. Said risk included the creation, maintenance, and failure to warn of a dangerous condition at the subject premises. Defendants, and each of them, failed to exercise ordinary care, including but not limited to: negligently training, negligently employing, negligently operating heavy machinery, negligently entrusting the property and work area without having adequate safeguards, including but not limited to, warning of the dangerous, concealed conditions thereon, tots Form Approved for Optional Uso (Code of Civil Procadure 425.2 Satcia! Count of Celerra CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence scifine PLO-P1001(2} [Rev Janussy 1, 2007)@ e PLD-PI-001(4) SHORT TITLE: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE v. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, CASE NUMBER: INC. Second CAUSE OF ACTION—Premises Liability Page 5 (number) ATTACHMENT TO | X.. Complaint ““__ Cross-Complaint (Use a seperate cause of action form for each cause of action.) Prem.L-1. Plaintiff (name). BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE; BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN alleges the acts of defendants were the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. On (dale); April 20, 2010 plaintiff was injured on the following premises in the following fashion (description of premises and circumstances of injury): Victoria Canal Pump Station, 21000 Hwy 4, Holt, California, Contra Costa County Plaintiff incorporates by reference all prior allegations as though fully set forth herein. Plaintiff was severely and permanently injured at the subject property. Prem.L-2. _} Count One—Negligence The defendants who negligently owned, maintained, managed and operated the described premises were (names): Defendants and each of them X 2 Does 4 to 50, inclusive Prem.L-3. ©X) Count Two-Willful Failure to Warn (Civil Code section 846] The defendant owners who willfully ‘of maliciously failed to guard or warn against a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity were {names}. Defendants and each of them Xj Does 2 to 50, inclusive Plaintiff, a recreational user, was _ | an invited quest |___' a paying guest. Prem.L-4. | _' Count Three-Dangerous Condition of Public Property The defendants who owned public property on which a dangerous condition existed were (names): [_) Does to a.{_”} The defendant public entityhad {—_] actual (_. | constructive notice of the existence of the _ dangerous condition in sufficient time prior to the injury to have corrected it. b. The condition was created by employees of the defendant public entity. Prem.L-5. a. ‘ X! Allegations about Other Defendants The defendants who were the agents and employees of the other defendants and acted within the scope of the agency were (names): Defendants and each of them “| Does 2 to 50, inclusive “"! The defendants who are liable to plaintifis for other reasons and the reasons for their liability are . .! described in attachment Prem.L-5.b as follows (names): Page sof "ometa Corel of Soon, CAUSE OF ACTION—Premises Liability sohitns Gossett Prceen $25.2 PLO-P1-003(4) (Rev. January 1, 2007]SHORT TITLE: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE v. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. Case Number. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION—Loss of Consortium Page 6 ATTACHMENT TO / X_/ Complaint /__/ Cross —- Complaint 1. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all prior allegations of the Complaint as though fully set forth herein. 2. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries sustained by Plaintiff, BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE, the husband of Plaintiff, BEATRI2 ARECHIGA BARRAGAN, resulting from the accident alleged herein and Defendants’ negligence and other conduct alleged herein, Plaintiff, BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN has been caused to be deprived of the love, companionship, society, relations and normally expected and rendered household duties and chores performed and rendered by Plaintiff, BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE prior to the accident alleged herein, such loss of consortium subject to proof at trial as to extent, duration, and further caused as a direct and proximate result of the negligence and other conduct as alleged herein of Defendants and the resulting injuries to Plaintiff, BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE, CAUSE OF ACTION—Loss of ConsortiumLe CM-010 FORAY OF FREY WATNOUT artonny moms CHSLER FILE 5?) ERIOR COURT, FOR COURT USE ONLY. San Prancisco, CA 94105-2818 2012 teternoneno 415/771-9700 ran 418/94 34 FEB 16 atroaweyror won: BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE. BARRAGAN URT ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CLERK OF THE CO \ Smerrapeness 400 McAllister Street ae ee A crak atric apress 400 McAllister Street ae es cnvanpzipcous San Francisco, CA 94102 BRANCH Nantz CASE NAME: 3B et ali. v. MANAGEMENT, INC., et al. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation cabinet - 1 2 ~- 5 X Unlimited Limited Counter Joinder 18 310 7 {Amount (Amount Filed with first appearance by defendant { 2voGe demanded di ded i excveds $25,000) SE 0S less) (Cal, Rules of Court, rule 3.402) ocr items 1-6 below must be completed {see instructions on page 2). Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case: Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation Auto (22) Breach of cantracthwarranty (C6) (Cal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.403) Uninsured motorist (48} Rule 3.740 collections (09) AntitrusTrade regulation (03) Other PUPDAND (Personal Injury!Proporty Other collections (03 Construction defect (10) Damage/Wrongful Death) Tort insurance Soverage te) Mass tort (40) Asbestos (04) Other contract (37) Securities litigation (28) Product liability (24) Real Property EnvironmantaVToxic tort (30) Medical malpractice (49) Eminent demain/Inverse insurance coverage claims arising from the XX Other PYPD/WD (23) condemnation (14) above listed provisionally complex case Non-PUPDIWD (Other) Tort Wrongful eviction (33) types (41) Business torvunfair business practice (07) Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment Civil rights (08) Untawtul Detainer Enforcement of judgment (20) Defamation (13) Commerciat (31) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint Fraud (16) Residential (32) RICO (27) Intellectual property (19) Drugs (38) Other complaint (not specified above) (42) Professional negiigence (25) Judicial Review Miscellaneous Civil Petition Other non-PUPD/WD tart (38) Asset forfeiture (05) Partnership and corporate governance (21) Employment Petition ra, arbitration award (11) Other petition (not specitied above) (43) Wrongful termination (36) Whit of mandate (02) Olher employment (15) Other judicial review (39) 2. This case is X isnot complex under rule 3.409 cf the California Rules of Court. If the case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional judicial management: a. Large number of separately represented parties Large number of witnesses b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e Coardination with related actions pending in one or more courts issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries, of in a federal court c. Substantial amount of documentary evidence f Substantial postjudgment judicial supervision 3. Remedies sought (check aif that apply)’ a. X% monetary b. nonmonetary; deciaratery cr injunctive relief . punitive 4. Number of causes of action (specify): T? + be gnc, Premises Liability, Loss of Consort 5. This case is % isnot aclass ection suit 6. Ifthere are any known related cases, file and serve a notice of related case (pinay use form .CM-015.} BY FAX Date: February 15, 2022 > | ' . SCOTT NH. WECHSLER SLAG IT, Seay TTYPE OR PRINT NAME} 7 ISIGNATORE GF BARTYOR ATTORNEY FOR PARTY} NOTICE / + Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions. » File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule. » If this case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. of the Catifornia Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the action or proceeding » Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. oe Bano tof 2 Judzul C CEsO1a [Rew Su'y 1 2007] 1 al & Plus 53 3 P43, revue CIVIL GASE COVER SHEET aie cn wd