Preview
OA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
May-06-2013 2:26 pm
Case Number: CGC-12-518307
Filing Date: May-03-2013 2:25
Filed by: EDNALEEN JAVIER
Juke Box: 001 Image: 04044279
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED
BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al
001004044279
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906
STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064
CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
BEEMAN and SCHELEY
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300
San Bruno, CA 94066
(650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX
Attorneys for Defendant
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307
BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN,
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN
MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE
v. APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO
CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a DATE
California Corporation; and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,
Date: April 30, 2013
Defendants. Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept: 206
Trial Date: July 22, 2013
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 30, 2013, the court made and entered its order granting
Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue the
July 22, 2013 Trial Date. A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
DATED: April 30, 2013 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
BEEMAN and SCHELEY
Attorneys for Defendant
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.
G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\NotEntryOrder.wpd
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION
FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATEEXHIBIT “A”i
JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906 i eee cals
STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064 07013
CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, APs SUG
BEEMAN and SCHELEY T
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ool OF we COUR
1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 ROCHELLE Fy Clare
San Bruno, CA 94066
(650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX
Attorneys for Defendant
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and
BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN,
Plaintiffs,
ve
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a
California Corporation; and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307
ed] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT PROVEN
MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN oR TO
CONTIN' Reta J ae 2, 2013 TRIAL
DATE prota
Date: April 30, 2013
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Dept: 206
Trial Date: July 22, 2013
The Court having reviewed Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte
Application for an Order to Continue the Trial Date, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN
THEREFOR,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Ex-Parte Application is GRANTED.
2. The July 22, 2013 Trial Date is Vacated.
Gi\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\[Proposed] Order Granting Ex Parte.wpd
Ipreposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 11, 2013 TRIAL DATE AND VACATE
AND CONTINUE THE JANUARY 3, 2013 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCEThe new Trial Date shall be September 16, 2013 in Department 206 at q: 30
Discovery, expert witness, and motion cut off dates are to be calculated pursuant to the
new trial date.
6. AN Ferther cogtiavances mest be sought he rofrccol
IT IS SO ORDERED. mobron on ly.
pare, ‘APRBO 2013
ee JUDGE COURT
CYNTHIA MING-ME! LEE om
G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Tria? Date\[Proposed] Order Granting Ex Parte.wpd
TO) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE,
APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 11, 2013 TRIAL DATE AND VACATE
AND CONTINUE THE JANUARY 3, 2013 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE20
27
28
URIBE v. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.
San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-12-518307
PROOF OF SERVICE - Civil
[Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 1011, 1013, 1031a, 2015.5]
METHOD OF SERVICE:
O By Personal Service O By Mail [By Overnight Delivery
OBy Messenger Service &] By Facsimile O By E-Mail/Electronic Transmission
1. Iam a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of
California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action.
2. My place of employment is 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300, San Bruno, CA 94066.
3. On the date set forth below, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the document
described as:
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN
MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE
THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATE
4, I served the document on the persons below, as follows:
Scott H. Wechsler, Esq.
Law Offices of Scott M. Wechsler
595 Market Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94105-2618
Tel: (415) 777-9700
Fax: (415) 948-2134
Attorneys for Plaintiffs BULMARO
BARRAGAN URIBE and BEATRIZ
ARECHIGA BARRAGAN
5. The document was served by the following means (specify):
a. BY PERSONAL SERVICE. I personally delivered the documents to the
persons at the addresses listed in item 4. (1) For a party represented by an
attorney, delivery was made to the attorney or at the attorney's office by
leaving the documents in an envelope or package clearly labeled to identify
the attorney being served with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the
office. (2) For a party, delivery was made to the party or by leaving the
documents at the party's residence with some person not less than 18 years of
age between the hours of eight in the morning and six in the evening.
b. BY UNITED STATES MAIL. I enclosed the documents ina sealed envelope
or package addressed to the persons at the addresses in item 4 and (specify
one):
(1) deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Services,
with the postage fully prepaid.
G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\POS(NotEntryOrder).wpd(2)
placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. | am readily familiar with this business's practice
for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the
same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it
is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States
Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid.
I am resident or employed in the County where the mailing occurred. The envelope or
package was placed in the mail at San Bruno, California, County of San Mateo.
c.
BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY. [ enclosed the documents in an envelope
or package provided by an overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the
persons at the addresses in item 4. I place the envelope or package for
collection and overnight delivery at an office or a regularly utilized drop box
of the overnight delivery carrier.
BY MESSENGER SERVICE. I served the documents by placing them in
an envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in
item 4 and providing them to a professional messenger service for service.
BY FAX TRANSMISSION. Based on an agreement of the parties to accept
service by fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax
numbers listed in item 4. No error was reported by the fax machine that I
used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is
attached.
BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court
order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic
transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the email
addresses listed in item 4. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the
transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission
was unsuccessful.
& (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct.
oO (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the offices of a member of the bar of this court at
whose direction this service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
Executed on April 30, 2012, at San Bruno, California.
dae Datbe
Proof of Service - Civil
[Code of Civ.Proc. §§ 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5]
G:\Data\DOCS\0094104507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\POS(NotEntryOrder).wpd. CLAPP, MORONEY, BEL” “4M Fax:650-989-5499
*x* Transmit Confirmation Report *x
Pi Apr 30 2013 02:50pm
914159482134 | 6 [eax
1} JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906
STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064
2) CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
BEEMAN and SCHELEY
3) A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
1111 Bayhill Drives Suite 300
San Bruno, CA
(650) 989- 5400 (650). 989-5499 FAX
4
5
Attomeys for Defendant
6 PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
9 COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
10
11} BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307
BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN,
12 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER
Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN
13 MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE
v APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO
14 CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL
PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a DATE
15]| California Corporation; and DOES | to 50,
inclusive,
16) Date: 4 nil 30, 2013
Defendants. Time: 11:00 am.
17 Dept: 408
18 Trial Date: July 22, 2013
19] TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 30, 2013, the court made and entered its order, granting
21} Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue the
22] July 22, 2013 Trial Date. A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
23
DATED: April 30, 2013 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH,
24 BEEMAN and SCHELEY
Mm
2s XC.
By: ee c
26 TEP] V.HA) RINGTON
Attomeys Yor Defen
27 PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.
28
GAData\DOCS190941045071Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\NotEntryOrder.wpd
‘NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC'S EX PARTE APPLICATION
FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATE.
Preview
OA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-06-2013 2:26 pm Case Number: CGC-12-518307 Filing Date: May-03-2013 2:25 Filed by: EDNALEEN JAVIER Juke Box: 001 Image: 04044279 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER/NOTICE OF RULING FILED BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE VS. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al 001004044279 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906 STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX Attorneys for Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307 BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN, NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE v. APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a DATE California Corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Date: April 30, 2013 Defendants. Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 206 Trial Date: July 22, 2013 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 30, 2013, the court made and entered its order granting Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue the July 22, 2013 Trial Date. A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” DATED: April 30, 2013 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY Attorneys for Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\NotEntryOrder.wpd NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATEEXHIBIT “A”i JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906 i eee cals STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064 07013 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, APs SUG BEEMAN and SCHELEY T A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ool OF we COUR 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300 ROCHELLE Fy Clare San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 989-5400 (650) 989-5499 FAX Attorneys for Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN, Plaintiffs, ve PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a California Corporation; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307 ed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN oR TO CONTIN' Reta J ae 2, 2013 TRIAL DATE prota Date: April 30, 2013 Time: 11:00 a.m. Dept: 206 Trial Date: July 22, 2013 The Court having reviewed Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue the Trial Date, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Ex-Parte Application is GRANTED. 2. The July 22, 2013 Trial Date is Vacated. Gi\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\[Proposed] Order Granting Ex Parte.wpd Ipreposed] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 11, 2013 TRIAL DATE AND VACATE AND CONTINUE THE JANUARY 3, 2013 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCEThe new Trial Date shall be September 16, 2013 in Department 206 at q: 30 Discovery, expert witness, and motion cut off dates are to be calculated pursuant to the new trial date. 6. AN Ferther cogtiavances mest be sought he rofrccol IT IS SO ORDERED. mobron on ly. pare, ‘APRBO 2013 ee JUDGE COURT CYNTHIA MING-ME! LEE om G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Tria? Date\[Proposed] Order Granting Ex Parte.wpd TO) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE, APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE MARCH 11, 2013 TRIAL DATE AND VACATE AND CONTINUE THE JANUARY 3, 2013 MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE20 27 28 URIBE v. PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC., et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-12-518307 PROOF OF SERVICE - Civil [Code of Civ. Proc. §§ 1011, 1013, 1031a, 2015.5] METHOD OF SERVICE: O By Personal Service O By Mail [By Overnight Delivery OBy Messenger Service &] By Facsimile O By E-Mail/Electronic Transmission 1. Iam a citizen of the United States and am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. 2. My place of employment is 1111 Bayhill Drive, Suite 300, San Bruno, CA 94066. 3. On the date set forth below, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the document described as: NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATE 4, I served the document on the persons below, as follows: Scott H. Wechsler, Esq. Law Offices of Scott M. Wechsler 595 Market Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94105-2618 Tel: (415) 777-9700 Fax: (415) 948-2134 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN 5. The document was served by the following means (specify): a. BY PERSONAL SERVICE. I personally delivered the documents to the persons at the addresses listed in item 4. (1) For a party represented by an attorney, delivery was made to the attorney or at the attorney's office by leaving the documents in an envelope or package clearly labeled to identify the attorney being served with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the office. (2) For a party, delivery was made to the party or by leaving the documents at the party's residence with some person not less than 18 years of age between the hours of eight in the morning and six in the evening. b. BY UNITED STATES MAIL. I enclosed the documents ina sealed envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses in item 4 and (specify one): (1) deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Services, with the postage fully prepaid. G:\Data\DOCS\0094\04507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\POS(NotEntryOrder).wpd(2) placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary business practices. | am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am resident or employed in the County where the mailing occurred. The envelope or package was placed in the mail at San Bruno, California, County of San Mateo. c. BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY. [ enclosed the documents in an envelope or package provided by an overnight delivery carrier and addressed to the persons at the addresses in item 4. I place the envelope or package for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier. BY MESSENGER SERVICE. I served the documents by placing them in an envelope or package addressed to the persons at the addresses listed in item 4 and providing them to a professional messenger service for service. BY FAX TRANSMISSION. Based on an agreement of the parties to accept service by fax transmission, I faxed the documents to the persons at the fax numbers listed in item 4. No error was reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the record of the fax transmission, which I printed out, is attached. BY E-MAIL OR ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION. Based on a court order or an agreement of the parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused the documents to be sent to the persons at the email addresses listed in item 4. I did not receive, within a reasonable time after the transmission, any electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful. & (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. oO (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the offices of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction this service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 30, 2012, at San Bruno, California. dae Datbe Proof of Service - Civil [Code of Civ.Proc. §§ 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5] G:\Data\DOCS\0094104507\Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\POS(NotEntryOrder).wpd. CLAPP, MORONEY, BEL” “4M Fax:650-989-5499 *x* Transmit Confirmation Report *x Pi Apr 30 2013 02:50pm 914159482134 | 6 [eax 1} JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. BAR#: 67906 STEPHEN V. HARRINGTON, ESQ. BAR#: 222064 2) CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, BEEMAN and SCHELEY 3) A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 1111 Bayhill Drives Suite 300 San Bruno, CA (650) 989- 5400 (650). 989-5499 FAX 4 5 Attomeys for Defendant 6 PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, 9 COUNTY OF SANTA FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 10 11} BULMARO BARRAGAN URIBE and CASE NO.: CGC-12-518307 BEATRIZ ARECHIGA BARRAGAN, 12 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER Plaintiffs, GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN 13 MANAGEMENT, INC.’S EX PARTE v APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO 14 CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC, a DATE 15]| California Corporation; and DOES | to 50, inclusive, 16) Date: 4 nil 30, 2013 Defendants. Time: 11:00 am. 17 Dept: 408 18 Trial Date: July 22, 2013 19] TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 30, 2013, the court made and entered its order, granting 21} Defendant PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC.’s Ex Parte Application for an Order to Continue the 22] July 22, 2013 Trial Date. A true and correct copy is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 23 DATED: April 30, 2013 CLAPP, MORONEY, BELLAGAMBA, VUCINICH, 24 BEEMAN and SCHELEY Mm 2s XC. By: ee c 26 TEP] V.HA) RINGTON Attomeys Yor Defen 27 PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC. 28 GAData\DOCS190941045071Ex Parte to Continue Trial Date\NotEntryOrder.wpd ‘NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PROVEN MANAGEMENT, INC'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JULY 22, 2013 TRIAL DATE.