On June 05, 2014 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
David Confeiteiro,
and
Gelco Corporation,
Tatiana Mezarina-Rojas,
The Nielsen Company,
for V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
in the District Court of Fairfield County.
Preview
CV 14-6043491-S SUPERIOR COURT
DAVID CONFEITEIRO J. D. OF FAIRFIELD
V AT BRIDGEPORT
TATIANA MEZARINA-ROJAS, ET AL JULY 18, 2014
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
The plaintiff DAVID CONFEITEIRO hereby request a 30 day extension of time within which
to respond to the defendants interrogatories and Request for Production dated June 26, 2014 to
include August 26, 2014.
The additional time is needed to accurately respond to said Interrogatories and Request for
Production.
The plaintiffs further represents that the instant matter has not been assigned for trial.
THE PLAINTIFFS
___________________/015768/
Joseph S. Dobrowolski
51 Elm St.
New Haven, CT 06510
Their attorney (203)787-1293
ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED
ORDER
The foregoing motion, having been presented to this court, it is hereby
ORDERED; GRANTED/DENIED
BY THE COURT
__________________________________
Judge/Clerk
CERTIFICATION
Copies of the foregoing have been mailed to all pro se parties and counsel of record this 18TH day
of JULY, 2014
______________________/015768/_
Joseph S. Dobrowolski
Nancy A. Meehan, Esq.
Law offices of Loccisano, Turret & Rosenbaum
101 Barnes Rd. 3rd fl.
Wallingford, CT 06492
Document Filed Date
July 18, 2014
Case Filing Date
June 05, 2014
Category
V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
CV 14-6043491-S SUPERIOR COURT DAVID CONFEITEIRO J. D. OF FAIRFIELD V AT BRIDGEPORT TATIANA MEZARINA-ROJAS, ET AL JULY 18, 2014 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME The plaintiff DAVID CONFEITEIRO hereby request a 30 day extension of time within which to respond to the defendants interrogatories and Request for Production dated June 26, 2014 to include August 26, 2014. The additional time is needed to accurately respond to said Interrogatories and Request for Production. The plaintiffs further represents that the instant matter has not been assigned for trial. THE PLAINTIFFS ___________________/015768/ Joseph S. Dobrowolski 51 Elm St. New Haven, CT 06510 Their attorney (203)787-1293 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED TESTIMONY NOT REQUIRED ORDER The foregoing motion, having been presented to this court, it is hereby ORDERED; GRANTED/DENIED BY THE COURT __________________________________ Judge/Clerk CERTIFICATION Copies of the foregoing have been mailed to all pro se parties and counsel of record this 18TH day of JULY, 2014 ______________________/015768/_ Joseph S. Dobrowolski Nancy A. Meehan, Esq. Law offices of Loccisano, Turret & Rosenbaum 101 Barnes Rd. 3rd fl. Wallingford, CT 06492