arrow left
arrow right
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

© oN A WA BR WN & NY NY NY YN NR N KY HF SF KF ese Fe Fe Be Be Se eS ou A A FF BK SF SF oO OM IRA HA BBY KH KF S Dana Sack, SBN: 92425 Joanne Rosendin, SBN: 121025 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 340 ELECTRONICALLY Oakland, California 94612 FILED Telephone: (510) 286-2200 Superior Court of California, for Defendant County of San Francisco Attorneys for Defendant, CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, coARR 28.2009 an Illinois corporation BY: WILLIAM TRUPEK Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION LOUIS CASTAGNA, NO. CGC - 07 - 274230 Plaintiff, JOINDER OF DEFENDANT CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON v. COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, TO THE ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BP), et al., WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE Defendants. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION Date: May 11, 2009 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept.: 610 Judge: Comm. Bruce E. Chan Complaint Filed: June 6, 2007 Trial Date: None Set TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, an Illinois corporation (“CBI”), hereby joins in the Notice of Motion and Motion for Protective Order Re: Plaintiffs Deposition, filed by its co-defendant THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY (“WPC”). WPC’s Motion is to be heard on May 11, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. in Department 610 of the above referenced Court and seeks at a minimum of an additional twenty (20) hours so as to obtain the rest of Plaintiff's testimony and ascertain the extent to which Plaintiff has facts to support his claimed exposures and each Defendants’ role, if any, therein. -1- JOINDER OF DEFENDANT CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, TO THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITIONCm NA A FF WHY YPN YD NY RY KR KY NY YY Be Be Be eB ewe Be ese em ot AW BF YB HF Se we IY A A Bw KR =| SS For purposes of this Joinder, Defendant CBI hereby adopts and incorporates by reference, WPC’s moving papers as if their own, including the Notice of Motion, Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities and exhibits and declarations filed by WPC in support of their Motion; any Joinder, together with all pleadings and documents filed in this matter by other co-defendants herein. CBI is prepared to proceed with the motion and hearing as scheduled even if WPC or any other joining party withdraws the motion or is no longer a party. Plaintiffs will not be prejudiced by this Joinder because they have already been provided reasonable and legally sufficient notice of the motion and the scheduled hearing date. Defendant CBI further incorporates herein the Declaration of Dana Sack filed and served concurrently herewith. Under Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Constr. Co., (1* Dist., 1999) 69 Cal. App. 4th 64, CBI cannot obtain summary judgment without obtaining responses from the plaintiff regarding all of the matters discussed above, Counsel for CBI cannot prepare for defense at trial without obtaining responses from the plaintiff regarding all of the matters discussed above nor advise CBI regarding the settlement value of this lawsuit, Defendant CBI requires more than one hour and less than two hours to examine the plaintiff regarding the two oil refineries where he believes he saw CBI employees working at the same time he was working at those locations, If he were to testify that he saw CBI working at any other refineries the same amount of additional time would be required, an additional 1-2 hours. DATED: April 27, 2009 SACK ROSENDIN, LLP Dana Sack Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, an Illinois corporation -2- JOINDER OF DEFENDANT CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, TO THE WILLIAM POWELL COMPANY’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION