arrow left
arrow right
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

OUNUUCN SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet May-19-2009 2:07 pm Case Number: CGC-07-274230 Filing Date: May-19-2009 2:07 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02500606 ORDER LOUIS CASTAGWNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS 001002500606 Instructions Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.BRAYTON®PURCELL LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 222. RUSH LANDING ROAD PO BOX 6169 NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169 (415) 898-1555 ec me NIN DW Rw Ww 10 ALAN R. BRAYTON, ESO., S.B. #73685 JENNIFER L. ALESIO, ESQ., 8.B. #258413 BRAVTON*PURCELL LLP Attorneys at Law 222 Hush Landing Road P.O. Box 6169 Novafo, California 94948-6169 (415)|898-1555 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LOUIS CASTAGNA, ASBESTOS No. 274230 BY FAX Plaintiff, VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (BYP) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS? MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO COMPEL THE FURTHER DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF 2009, i their c reason Ml Ml Mit Mt Mt Mt KAlnjuredty Date: May 11, 2009 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept: 610 as Judge: Coraslesioner Pat Stavit 4 Action Filed: June 6, 2007 - Trial Date: Not set Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order came on regularly for hearing on May 11, f Department 610 of the above-captioned Court. Plaintiff and defendants appeared by junsel of record. Having considered all papers and evidence submitted, and inferences bly deducible therefrom, the Court determines as follows: 298; maou’ 1 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO COMPEL THE FURTHER DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFFMAES EAN To; Foley & Mansfield PLLP-Oakiand ~~ From: | Monday, May 11, 2009 3:35 PM Page: 6 of 6 Subject Castagna IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendants’ Motion for Protective Order to Compel the Further Deposition of Plaintiff is GRANTED, and said deposition will continue at are reached on the record, agreed upon date and time until a total of thi Dated: 5. 18 GF { Judge of the Superior Court APPROVED AS TO FORM. PAUL SLAVIT . co “MMISSIONER FOLEY & MANSFIELD, P.L.L.P, BY FAX 1 Counsel for Defendants Coed AW Aw dD kMnjomec1N2?980edeenpa uae 2 PRDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO COMPEL THE FURTHER DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF