arrow left
arrow right
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

Oo em NA HW RB BW NR Mm RR NM RR RR Reem NS fe & FB FS 8& 3S SF Ge WA Bw RH KH = SD 28 BRYDON Huso & Parker 135 MAIN STREET 20" FLOOR Soe Pranelsen, CA 98108 Edward R. Hugo [Bar No. 124839] Gregor S. Rosse [Bar No. 157965} Ken L. oang [Bar No. 207645] BRYDON © & PARKER 135 Main Street, 20% Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 808-0300 Facsimile: (415) 808-0333 Attorneys for Defendant NIBCO INC. ELECTRONICALLY FILED Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco JUN 22 2010 Clerk of the Court BY: RAYMOND K. WONG Deputy Clerk | SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION LOUIS CASTAGNA, Plaintiff(s), VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (8*P), ET AL, Defendants. (ASBESTOS) Case No, CGC-07-274230 DEFENDANT NIBCO, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [C.CP. §437c] (Filed concurrently with Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts; and Declaration of Ken L. Hoang) Date: September 8, 2010 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 220 . Judge: Harold E. Kahn Action filed: June 6, 2007 Trial Date: October 12, 2010 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 8, 2010 at 9:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as this matter may be heard, in Department 220 of this Court, Defendant NIBCO, INC. (hereinafter “NIBCO”) will move the Court, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 437c, for an order granting summary judgment, including costs of suit, in NIBCO’s favor and against Plaintiff, LOUIS CASTAGNA, (“Plaintiff”). 1 DEFENDANT NIBCO, ING’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [C.C.P. §497c]San Fraacisen, CA 94105 In the alternative, if for any reason summary judgment cannot be granted, NIBCO will and hereby does move the Court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 437c(f) for an order adjudicating that the following causes of action and claim for punitive damages contained in Plaintiff's Complaint have no merit: ADJUDICATION ISSUE NO. LE Plaintiff's First cause of action (Negligence) has no merit, because there is no evidence that NIBCO caused Plaintiff's asbestos-related injuries or that he was exposed to any asbestos-containing products manufactured, supplied, or distributed by NIBCO. ADJUDICATION ISSUE NO, 2: Plaintiff's Second cause of action (Strict Liability) has no merit, because there is no evidence that NIBCO caused Plaintiff's asbestos-related injuries or that he was exposed to any asbestos-containing products manufactured, supplied, or distributed by NIBCO, ADIUDICATION ISSUE NO. 3: , Plaintiffs Third Cause of Action (for False Representation) has no metit because there is no evidence that NIBCO caused Plaintiff's asbestos-related injuries or that he was exposed to any asbestos-containing products manufactured, supplied, sold by NIBCO; or that Plaintiff relied on any misrepresentations by NIBCO. ADJUDICATION ISSUE NO. 4 Plaintiff's claim and prayer for punitive damages has no merit, because there is no- evidence that NIBCO caused Plaintiff’s asbestos-related injuries, or that he was exposed to any asbestos-containing products manufactured, supplied, or distributed by NIBCO, or that there is any “clear and convincing evidence” that any of the conduct at issue concerning NIBCO’s conduct herein constitutes “malice,” “oppression,” or “fraud,” or “despicable conduct,” which is necessary to support such a claim. This motion is based upon this Notice; the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities; the Declaration of Ken L. Hoang; and the Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed concurrently herewith, all files and pleadings in this 2 DEFENDANT NIBCO, INC.’/S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [C.C.P. §437c}BRYDON Hugo & PARKER 135 MAIN STREET 20" Foon San Francisco, CA 94405 action, and upon such further oral and documentary evidence or argument as may be presented at the hearing of this motion. Dated: June 22, 2010 By: 3 BRYDON HUGO & PARKER /s/ Ken L. Hoang " Edward R. Hugo Greg S. Rosse Ken L. Hoang Attorneys for Defendant NIBCO, INC. DEFENDANT NIBCO, INC’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [C.C.P. §437c}