arrow left
arrow right
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • LOUIS CASTAGNA VS. ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B/P)AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBITS et al ASBESTOS document preview 
						
                                
Preview

                                & CORDERY, LLP

1

Law

IMAL, TADLOCK, K.

Theodore T. Cordery, Esq. (Bar No. 114730)
Valerie R. Marvin, Esq. (Bar No. 254194)

IMAI, TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP

100 BUSH STREET, SUITE 1300
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 675-7000
Facsimile: (415) 675-7008
Attorneys for Defendant

ELECTRONICALLY
FILED

Superior Court of California,
County of San Francisco

JUN 23 2010
Clerk of the Court

ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., IRCYANESSA WU

Deputy Clerk

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN AND FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

LOUIS CASTAGNA,

Plaintiff,

ASBESTOS DEFENDANTS (B*P) As
Reflected on Exhibits B, B-1, C, D, H, §; and.
DOES {-8500; and SEE ATTACHED LIST.

Defendants.

ale

CASE NO.: CGC-07-274230

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC
SERVICE OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT
COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S”
NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO.,
INC.’S” SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF
ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION; DEFENDANT ELLIOTT
COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S”
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION; DECLARATION OF
VALERIE R. MARVIN IN SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO.,
INC.”’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ELLIOTT
COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”’S
OBJECTONS TO EVIDENCE IN
SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT

PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA.
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.°5” NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.& CORDERY, LLP

1

Law

IMAL, TADLOCK, K.

COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S”
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION; [PROPOSED ORDER]
GRANTING DEFENDANT ELLIOTT
COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION

Date: September 9, 2010
Time: 9:30 a.m.

Dept: 220

Judge: Hon. Harold Kahn

Complaint Filed: June 6, 2007
Trial Date: October 12, 2010

1, Heather Cherry, declare:

iam a resident of the State of California and over the age of eighteen years, and not a
party to the within action; my business address is 100 Bush Street, Suite 1300, San Francisco, CA
94104,

On the date of execution below, | electronically served the document via LexisNexis File
& Serve described as:

DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO.,
INC.’S” NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY
FKA “ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S” SEPARATE STATEMENT OF
UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.” MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY
FKA “ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S” MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DECLARATION OF
VALERIE R. MARVIN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ELLIOTT
COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”S OBJECTONS TO
EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S” MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
iit

itt
‘Tf
iit

2.
PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.’S” NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR,
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.LAW OFFICES

IMAI, TADLOCK, KEENEY & CORDERY, LLP

0

54104

[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA
“ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO,, INC.”"S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the LexisNexis File & Serve
Web site.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.

Executed on June 23, 2010, at San Francisco, California.

/S/ Heather Cherry
Heather Cherry

3.
[PROPOSED ORDER] GRANTING DEFENDANT ELLIOTT COMPANY FKA “ELLIOTT
TURBOMACHINERY CO., INC.”’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION