arrow left
arrow right
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
  • JAMES RODAMER VS. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al ASBESTOS document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 | MARK A. LOVE (SBN 162028) KHALED TAQI-EDDIN (SBN 220923) ELECTRONICALLY 2 | SELMAN BREITMAN LLP FILED 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor Superior Court of California, 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 County of San Francisco Telephone: (415) 979-0400 4 Facsimile: (415) 979-2099 oar 29 200 Tonk mlove@selmanbreitman.com BY: EDNALEEN JAVIER-LACSON 5 | ktagieddin@selmanbreitman.com Deputy Clerk 6 Attorneys for Defendant 7 | DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNTA 9 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO - UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 10 1] JAMES RODAMER & NANCY RODAMER, CASE NQ. 456569 et al., 12 PROOF OF SERVICE VIA LEXIS Plaintiffs, NEXIS FILE & SERVE RE: 13 Vv. ! 1. DOUGLASS INSULATION 14 ~ COMPANY INC.'S NOTICE OF A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., i MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, Defendants. SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 16 2. DOUGLASS INSULATION Selman Breitman LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 17 COMPANY'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN 18 SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE 19 ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 20 3. DECLARATION OF KHALED TAQI- 21 EDDIN IN SUPPORT GF DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY’S MOTION 22 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 23 ADJUDICATION 24 4, DECLARATION OF VIRGINA SMOTITERMAN IN SUPPORT OF 25 DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 26 JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 27 ADJUDICATION 28 5. DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY'S SEPARATE STATEMENT 127K98.1 148.22997 _—_"n eT on FROOKF OF SERVICE2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 eo a Ss 12 65 Se og u ee 15 ae 6 & 17 ? 1s 19 20 21 22 23 4 25 26 21 28 vannia) 620007 OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION PROOF OF SERVICE2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 al a 12 ge z g2 13 m< ee Pg 1s ge Se 16 a* o 17 n 18 19 20 21 2 23 24 25 26 27 2B 1088 6s 2007 JAMES RODAMER & NANCY RODAMER, et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al. San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-06-456569 Defendant: DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY, INC. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. PROOF OF SERVICE BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION 1am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and am not a party to the within action, My business address is 33 New Montgomery, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105. On March 29, 2007, I electronically served the document(s) via Lexis Nexis File & Serve described as: 1, DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY INC.'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR, SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 2. DOUGLASS INSULATLON COMPANY'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Ok, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 3. DECLARATION OF KHALED TAQI-EDDIN IN SUPPORT OF DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 4. DECLARATION OF VIRGINA SMOTHERMAN IN SUPPORT OF DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 5. DOUGLASS INSULATION COMPANY'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION on the recipients designated on the Transaction Receipt located on the Lexis Nexis File & Serve website. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 29, 2007, at San Francisco, C{ PROOF OF SERVICE