On May 26, 2006 a
Party Discovery
was filed
involving a dispute between
Maiman, Ruth,
Shorenstein Company Llc,
Shorenstein Realty Services L.P. (Sued As,
and
Doe One Through Doe Twenty,
Millar Elevator Service Company,
Schindler Elevator Corporation,
Shorenstein Company Llc,
Shorenstein Realty,
Shorenstein Realty Services L.P. (Sued As,
for PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
WOOO
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Document Scanning Lead Sheet
Oct-28-2008 9:20 am
Case Number: CGC-06-452609
Filing Date: Oct-28-2008 9:17
Juke Box: 001 Image: 02297115
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al
001002297115
Instructions:
Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.wo word awn rk YW N
Charles H. Horn, (State Bar No. 63362)
Jill K. Rizzo, (State Bar No. 236471)
LeClairRyan LLP
44 Montgomery Street, 18th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104-4705
Telephone: (415) 391-7111
Telefax: (415) 391-8766
Attorneys for Defendants
SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC AND SHORENSTEIN
REALTY SERVICES, L.P.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
30|
Reh S&P 22 2008
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION
RUTH MAIMAN,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC,
SHORENSTEIN REALTY, and DOE ONE
through DOE TWENTY,
Defendants.
Case No.: CGC 06 452609
JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT
TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 437c
LL.
=
The Court having on September 5, 2008, granted the Motion for Summary Judgment feed
in the alternative, Summary Adjudication by Defendants SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC and
SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES L.P. (“Defendants”), and having ordered entry of
judgment and dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint as requested in said motion:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff RUTH MAIMAN shall
take nothing by way of her Complaint, and that Defendants shall recover from Plaintiff RUTH
Mt
Mt
JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 437¢Maiman costs of suit in the sum of $ JO /7 1,33 (Meroaa ndum of
‘led. 07 07/22 [of
Coata ark Disburementa x:
Dated: OCT 27 2008, 2008 :
yo ee
at (on. Peter Bysch, Judge of the Superior Court
HK YS 2609
Kath VIVA PAGER
v2.
Spovenarerra Co. ELC
JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 437¢
Document Filed Date
October 28, 2008
Case Filing Date
May 26, 2006
Category
PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
WOOO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Oct-28-2008 9:20 am Case Number: CGC-06-452609 Filing Date: Oct-28-2008 9:17 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02297115 JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al 001002297115 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.wo word awn rk YW N Charles H. Horn, (State Bar No. 63362) Jill K. Rizzo, (State Bar No. 236471) LeClairRyan LLP 44 Montgomery Street, 18th Floor San Francisco, California 94104-4705 Telephone: (415) 391-7111 Telefax: (415) 391-8766 Attorneys for Defendants SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC AND SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES, L.P. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 30| Reh S&P 22 2008 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION RUTH MAIMAN, Plaintiff, Vv. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC, SHORENSTEIN REALTY, and DOE ONE through DOE TWENTY, Defendants. Case No.: CGC 06 452609 JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 437c LL. = The Court having on September 5, 2008, granted the Motion for Summary Judgment feed in the alternative, Summary Adjudication by Defendants SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC and SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES L.P. (“Defendants”), and having ordered entry of judgment and dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint as requested in said motion: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff RUTH MAIMAN shall take nothing by way of her Complaint, and that Defendants shall recover from Plaintiff RUTH Mt Mt JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 437¢Maiman costs of suit in the sum of $ JO /7 1,33 (Meroaa ndum of ‘led. 07 07/22 [of Coata ark Disburementa x: Dated: OCT 27 2008, 2008 : yo ee at (on. Peter Bysch, Judge of the Superior Court HK YS 2609 Kath VIVA PAGER v2. Spovenarerra Co. ELC JUDGMENT BY COURT PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 437¢