arrow left
arrow right
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
  • RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al PERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE - NON-VEHICLE RELATED document preview
						
                                

Preview

ICT A San Francisco Superior Courts Information Technology Group Document Scanning Lead Sheet Feb-13-2008 12:05 pm Case Number: CGC-06-452609 Filing Date: Feb-13-2008 12:02 Juke Box: 001 Image: 02024114 ORDER RUTH MAIMAN VS. SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC et al 001002024114 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned.~ wo oN DH UW S&F WN 10 Charles H. Hom, (State Bar No, 063362) _ oF y ¥ XK Jill K, Rizzo, (State Bar No. 236471) Sin Frenne as i tnet He WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM = munerior Court 44 Montgomery Street, 18th Floor FEB 13 20 San Francisco, California 94104-4705 08 Telephone: (415) 391-7111 GOhu Ua ranecu, Clerk Telefax: (415) 391-8766 BY Etat. ; Deputy Clerk Attomeys for Defendants SHORENSTEIN COMPANY LLC AND SHORENSTEIN REALTY SERVICES, L.P. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION RUTH MAIMAN, Case No.: CGC 06 452609 Plaintiff, pproketey ORDER Ae Self v. knd Shae fiir 9 Zinc SHORENSTEIN REALTY, and DOE ONE Fon fueeg Cale through DOE TWENTY, , Defendants. The Court, having considered the ex parte application of defendants Shorenstein Company LLC and Shorenstein Realty Services, L.P., along with oral argument from counsel, and for good cause appearing therefore: , IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for an Order Shortening Time for Service of Notice of Motion and Motion and to Advance the Hearing Date on Defendants Shorenstein Company LLC And Shorenstein Realty Services, L.P.’s Motion To Compel the Depositions of Plaintiff and Jack Maiman is Granted. The hearing date of March 7, 2008 is vacated and the hearing is now set for _[ a0 F oy lor3odm Ypesiber shll be fil and prt 62 ard Leeved pb, 21, ae Liply thal be fald ond factor hare dsenerd [PROPOSED] ORDER hep 2S, 20 we lendey egte of ll pine lad Mg ie dermis Oewo aoe NY DH WNW F&F YP NH = NN NY NY WN NY ND Dm mm eae ont AA BF YW YN = SBD we HI DH RB YN & Dated: February _[3 , 2008 COMMISSIONER OF THE SUPER Mea Caer & 452409 [PROPOSED] ORDER